Alaska’s State Legislature faces a clear choice this session: we can bank oil revenue for the future, making investments in education and grow our economy; or we can give away $20 billion to multinational companies for oil they will continue to produce anyway.
The question is, why on earth does Gov. Sean Parnell want to give Big Oil a huge tax break when we are already facing budgetary challenges and Alaska’s school districts have not received a base student allocation increase in three years?
Over the last 30 years we have lived through incredibly volatile state budgets, a result of our reliance on oil for over 90 percent of the state’s revenue. Under the state Constitution, it is our oil. A prudent governor and Legislature would recognize that oil prices and the supply of economically recoverable oil will change in the future, and that we must save and reinvest revenue produced from today’s oil.
In 2007, the Legislature made a conscious choice to save for the future. Passage of Alaska’s Clear and Equitable Share (ACES) program produced budget surpluses and allowed the state to save billions of dollars in the budget reserve. Through strategic tax incentives, ACES also succeeded in attracting new oil explorers to Alaska. Today, we have more jobs in the oil industry, more capital investment in the oil sector, and more new exploratory wells than when ACES passed. This is major progress. However, the longstanding decline in oil flowing through the Trans-Alaska Pipeline (TAPS) has continued due to maturation of the Kuparuk and Prudhoe Bay fields.
Using TAPS as justification, the governor has proposed eliminating taxes on oil from existing fields even if it results in a revenue loss of $20 billion. The tax giveaway will create ongoing budget deficits, and will cripple our state’s competitiveness. We need to invest in education and worker training to create jobs, including but not limited to, the oil industry. Creation of high tech jobs and jobs in the renewable energy sector, such as jobs to develop our wind and geothermal resources, are an opportunity for our state’s economy to grow. Unfortunately, the governor’s budget, combined with his oil tax giveaway, will bankrupt our education system and preclude strategic investments we should be making now.
This year the Anchorage and Juneau school districts announced hundreds of layoffs. Over the last three years, the Juneau School District has lost close to 90 positions. We are looking at the loss of more in the coming school year. The Anchorage School District eliminated 100 school district jobs this past November. According to the Anchorage Daily News, these cuts are a result of the governor’s three-year freeze in education funding. Taking inflation into account, the governor’s freeze represents a real cut in basic education funding of approximately 7 percent. We cannot afford to cut educational investment at a time when our students are competing in a global market, and Alaska is competing with other states and nations to attract employers.
The choice is simple: We allow Governor Parnell to slash oil taxes, or we save money for the future and invest in education. Alaska cannot cut oil taxes and have a viable educational system.
The big three oil companies will continue production from Prudhoe and Kuparuk because it is profitable. In fact, ConocoPhillips earns three times as much profit from Alaska as the Lower 48 combined, and its SEC reports state that Alaska is the most profitable place to produce oil.
Governor Parnell’s oil tax giveaway is a dangerous idea that will lead to more funding cuts to schools, and a continued downward spiral of our educational standards. We must speak out and let Governor Parnell and our Legislature know that we will not sacrifice our children’s future for a giveaway to Big Oil! Alaska’s competitiveness and our children’s future depend upon it.
• Kimberly Metcalfe is the Democratic National Committeewoman for Alaska.





Comments (5)
Add commentI trust both Dennis Egan and
I trust both Dennis Egan and Beth Kertulla to vote for education even though they don't have children in school. Cathy Munoz has a child in school. I hope she will put his (and other children's) interests above those of her party.
rhythm
Rather than just hoping something will happen or someone will vote one way or the other, how about finding a candidate or candidates to run in the next election who people can be assured they will vote to represent them?
I see in the last election Rep. Munoz got over 600 votes, but that there were also over 200 write-in votes for people they thought would be better candidates. That seems to indicate that about 25% of the voters were not happy with the unchallenged candidate.
If one is unhappy with elected representatives, then they need to find candidates that they think will better represent them.
If you qualify to be a candidate, are you or someone you know interested in running for office?
Oil Taxes or Education - a clear choice (?) - bologni!
First of all, this is not true - these are not our only choices. This is not a black and white issue. We already have oil taxes and we already have education. There are always more than two choices in life. And, this is a trust issue. Frankly, I trust the oil companies more than I trust those who feel that increased taxes are the answers to all life's problems. I trust the oil companies more than I trust our teacher's unions and our school district leadership any more. The JSD asks for public input, but in the end they always do what they want anyway. Nothing makes sense any more. What happens when when the oil companies leave? Many want us to get off of fossil fuels anyway. States that do not have oil have education. Bottom line, I trust Governor Parnell to do the right thing for the State of Alaska.
hello juneau
You write about a "trust issue," and yet make assumptions like "We have oil taxes we already have education." Certainly we are asking oil companies to pay for our non-renewable resource that we are selling and we do have schools from kindergarten through colleges and universities. But what do we really "have" ? If I look in my cupboard and refrigerator I see that I have some canned goods and even some eggs and milk. But I don't see that I have what I need to feed myself for the next month or so. I still have to go shopping and see if I can buy I will need in the future.
You may "trust"oil corporations more than you "trust" those whom you think want to increase taxes "for all life's problems."
Gee, as an old man, I wish life were that simple, that I could find a industry that was so trustful and recognize those who are so evil like our educational system. About seventy years ago, I "grew up" and realized that simplistic explanations and solutions to problems were not quite as simple as I thought they were. I even came to discover that I couldn't always "trust" what individuals, stores or companies told me. I learned what the term "naive" means.
Certainly you may "trust" our duly elected Governor, because there is supporting evidence that he was fully and legally elected. But to say that you "trust him to do the right thing" is an assumption, a belief and nothing more.
I would really like to see your write that you are "convinced" through facts and evidence that he has been and is doing the right thing. Then others, who may not agree with you, could look at the facts or evidence to see if they can be verified or proven true or not, and if they support your trust.
Most of us grew up with trust that all the others told us was true. Then, as we aged with experience, and even looked at our own lives, we realized that we couldn't always "trust" everyone else, nor even our own selves.... we weren't the great saints or heroes we thought we were.
There is one comment I can't quite understand and perhaps you can explain it so an old man can understand. That is your sentence "States that do not have oil have education." I thought about this a lot and it just doesn't make any sense to me.....I know states in the United States and in other countries who have both oil and education. Some have oil and very limited education, especially for females, or some states that have neither oil nor good or adequate education.
I think I missed something in this sentence, sorry.
hello juneau 1
Some advice from an old man who has survived on planet earth for more than eighty years - don't trust everyone or everything people say. It can prevent disasters in your life.
For example, every morning as I sign into the internet, I get messages from Nigeria, Honduras, England and other places, telling me that I have just won or will get millions of dollars if I just provide some information like - give us your bank account number, your password, and all related identification information we need to access your bank account. They say, if you give us this, we will deposit money in your account. The truth is that what they want to do is have access to my bank account and take from me whatever they can get.
So if a person, or even our Governor tells legislators to give oil companies a billion or more dollars a year in profits at the expense of the people of Alaska with no guarantee they will benefit Alaska, please don't just "trust" that request. Find out if that is really true or not. Write your elected representative in the Legislature and question them whether the offer is true or not. You might even write some other legislator to make sure you are not being deceived.
This advice is free, just based on experience in life.