Last week our Washington, D.C. delegation followed Gov. Sean Parnell’s lead by seeking to beef up the U.S. military presence in Alaska. They formally asked the Air Force to relocate 24 F-16 aircraft from a base in Germany to Eielson Air Force Base in Fairbanks. While the proposal is presented as cost efficiency measure, it’s also about jobs in Alaska. And with sequestration a new economic reality, we can be assured that other governors will be looking to military bases overseas for opportunities to offset defense spending losses in their states.
Governor Parnell was relatively quiet during federal budget negotiations over sequestration. He didn’t jump into the ring like he did in 2011 when he endorsed Congressman Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) budget proposal and signed the Cut, Cap, and Balance Pledge. That’s probably because he knows Alaskans rely more heavily on federal spending than any other state, more than 40 percent of which comes from the Pentagon. And 56 percent of that is salary and wages for active duty military.
Parnell’s request followed months of opposition to an Air Force plan that would move 24 F-16s of the 18th Aggressor Squadron from Eielson to the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. The salaries of 600 airmen would have been taken out of the Fairbanks economy. As is always the case, members of Congress resist such impacts to constituent communities. Parnell’s proposal would have opposite effect. It would bring in millions of new dollars.
Looking at the military this way is like calling it a jobs program. And to a large degree that’s what it’s been since World War II. The salaries and wages paid to the military and Department of Defense civilians spread like wildfire into local economies, effectively creating more business opportunities and jobs.
U.S. military spending in Alaska was one of the primary anchors to the state economy that helped soften the blow of 2008 housing crisis and recession that followed. But the fact is the Pentagon budget more than doubled since the 2001 terrorist attacks. And Alaska’s economy was artificially stimulated by its share of that growth.
Of course, the recession hit just as President Obama moved into the White House. Democrats controlled both houses of Congress. They passed a huge stimulus bill and Obama’s Affordable Health Care Act. Those resulted in a significant backlash against government spending and changed the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives. Energized by newly elected Tea Party types in 2011, the GOP controlled House forced the President into cost-cutting concessions in order to increase the federal debt ceiling.
Sequestration was part of that package. It not only put the scared cow of military spending on the chopping block, discretionary defense programs (including weapons purchases, base operations, construction, training, etc.) will be half of all budget cuts. Supporting our troops will take on new meaning though because active military member salaries are exempt.
Meanwhile, much of the federal civilian workforce may face unpaid furloughs of up to 20 days per year. It will have the effect of a salary cut that, in Alaska, could take more than $50 million out of local economies. The ripple effect on businesses will be significant. But it will be far less in Anchorage and Fairbanks, where about 80 percent of all federal wages and salaries are earned by active duty military personnel.
Sequestration may not continue all the way to 2021 as prescribed. It may not even last a full year. But if it is a sign of things to come, then one way for states to offset the loss of federal employee income is to increase their take of the armed forces pie. And as that shrinks, the best place for members of Congress and Governors to look is to the American military bases across the oceans.
This is a good thing because it’s not only way past time to reduce military spending; we can’t afford to have the salaries of 125,000 service men and women bolstering economies in Europe and Asia. Nor should America be an empire policing the world. So let’s hope our Governor’s modest proposal to move two dozen F-16s from Germany to Fairbanks starts a nationwide call to bring our troops home.
• Moniak is a Juneau resident and is a civilian employee of the U.S. Coast Guard.





Comments (10)
Add commentMy thought...
Federal civilian employees won't be hurt by a slight reduction in pay!
Snagger, that is one of the
Snagger, that is one of the more idiotic statements you have made. How could you be so insensitive to your fellow Alaskan? I could care less who they work for. They are supporting local businesses, paying taxes into our city, buying girl scout cookies and sports team calendars, christmas trees from the swim team, etc. To be glad someone is being forced to take a pay cut is stupid. Some of these cuts are people out and out losing their jobs. Some are taking around 40% cuts, some are getting "only" 10%. How much could you afford to lose without it impacting your family?
Who pays?
Federal spending is out of control! Someone is going to have to pay, eventually. Probably today's children! Citizens of the United States, including Alaskans, need to get spending under control. It's an addiction we're asking others to satisfy!
our military budget is a job program for all
the private contractors ranging from on base support to building armament. Our troops are getting the short end of the deal as we increase the private contractors in every aspect of our defense budget. The highest risk are those taken by our men in women in the military. The highest wages and profits go to private contractors.
Defense contracting is a jobs program and our politicians are simply willing to allow more contractors as contractors are campaign contributors.
lets cut . . .
I agree lets cut spending. Lets start with DoD and DHS, and I don’t mean the military industrial complex because after all they are just good free market capitalist. No I mean we start with cutting spending on uniformed personnel. Effective immediately:
PAY & ALLOWANCES: all pay and allowances shall be frozen until pay parity is reached with the rest of the federal work force. all special pay (except combat pay) and bonuses are terminated. all special tax treatment of military pay (except combat pay) or allowances is terminated. yes, that means your housing and cost of living will be taxed.
HEALTH BENEFITS: the present health care package for active duty military is terminated and shall be replaced with the standard premium based health care benefits that is provided to the rest of the federal work force. Exception 1: active duty and reserve members being deployed will be provided free health care 6 prior, during and 6 months after a deployment to a combat theater; Exception 2: an active duty or reserve member injured in combat and receiving the Purple Heart shall receive free health care for life.
RETIREMENT: the present active duty retirement package is terminated and shall be replaced with the standard federal retirement package provided to ll federal workers. Exception 1: on a 2 for 1 ratio for combat service active duty and reserve members can back-out the age at which they would receive retirement (62). Exception 2: active duty and reserve members injured during combat service and receiving the Purple Heart may collect retirement on their date of discharge. Exception 3: active duty and reserve members who die in combat shall have their retirement awarded to their dependents along with a $500,000 one time stipend.
ED: the post 9/11GI Bill will hence forth will only be available to active duty and reserve members who served at least 180 days in a theater of combat. All gov funded post graduate opportunities will require 7 years additional service and not made available to any service member who has already received such a degree.
MISC: all gov owned prop for morale purposes shall be sold to private developers to do with as they see fit. all commissaries and exchanges shall be closed immediatley. HOW DO YOU LIKE THEM APPLES!
9line, instead of military
9line, instead of military personnel, change that to members of congress past and present and you've got a good idea
Our Troops
Bring out people home at whatever cost. Screw the war mongers. Let them fight their own wars and bring our people home to protect us.
Question, Rich & Sean:
What do we need those F16's for in the first place? Who are we afraid is going to attack us today?
How about just parking them in some empty hangar in mothball status and reduce the military expenditures both overseas and domestically.
Defense needed
We need to defend Alaska as the Arctic is the new frontier and probable battlefield. The Russians and Chinese are all over up there and they're becoming less friendly towards us, if they ever were friendly at all. Wow Lat, who are we afraid of? I'd say the Chinese, they have icebreakers, they're building aircraft carriers, they've stolen unknown amounts of our military and high tech secrets. Don't be blind.
Thanks for setting me straight, Banditrider
We need to be spending MORE on defense, not less, because the Chinese are our new military threat. So we we need to beef up against the Chinese by borrowing money FROM the Chinese, the money we gave them for making cheap junk for us.
The circle would be completed if we used that borrowed money to hire them to make us weapons...to be used against them.