• Overcast, light rain
  • 54°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

Alaska Editorial: Gov. didn't threaten

Posted: February 14, 2014 - 12:05am

The following editorial first appeared in the Ketchikan Daily News:

Gov. Sean Parnell didn’t threaten to retaliate against Ketchikan in reaction to an education lawsuit filed by the community’s borough.

That’s not who Parnell is.

Parnell simply gave an honest answer to a sincere question Feb. 6.

He acknowledged the same sentiments that appeared in a Ketchikan Daily News editorial shortly after the Ketchikan Gateway Borough decided in a narrow 4-3 vote to pursue the suit: By nature a lawsuit is an unfriendly gesture.

No Alaskan welcomes a lawsuit. Most, if not all, Alaskans would interpret a suit as adversarial and would have it in the backs of their minds when dealing with those who had brought it. Any Alaskan, if sued privately, would do the same.

That’s all the governor really said. Everything else is reading between the lines.

Gov. Parnell and the state legislators are Alaskans, many of whom had been lobbied by the borough in recent years to introduce legislation that would eliminate local contributions to school districts in organized boroughs.

None of the 60 legislators introduced a bill to that effect. Borough Manager Dan Bockhorst and four Assembly members didn’t agree with that result. Thus, the lawsuit.

It remains to be seen at the end of the legislative session how Ketchikan comes out in terms of state capital project dollars. But, the Assembly voted to pursue the lawsuit in October 2013.

In December 2013, Gov. Parnell released his proposed fiscal year 2015 budget. His budget showed an almost exact amount for the district home of Ketchikan to what appeared in the prior year’s. (Then last month Fairbanks Rep. Tammie Wilson pre-filed the bill the Ketchikan borough had hoped for earlier.)

Parnell’s critics of the past week also accused him of attacking local government. But, in fact, he spoke favorably about local governance of schools while in Ketchikan, and visited with some of the community’s students. When discussing education he pointed out that it is better to keep control and oversight at the local level, where parents, teachers and others interested in local schools can be involved more easily.

The interaction between the borough that provides school funding and the local public is irreplaceable, according to Parnell. The state cannot provide that accessibility, obviously because of geography. Nor would the state want to turn its education responsibility over to the federal government to pay the bill; that also would remove local control of schools, and Alaska — Ketchikan specifically — has experience with Washington, D.C., making decisions that negatively affect it. It would be chaos for local schools to be funded solely by the feds.

Ketchikan shouldn’t be quick to take offense at the inaccurate conclusions being drawn from Gov. Parnell’s responses. He simply stated the obvious that when one is sued there’s no pretending it didn’t happen. For gubernatorial challengers in an election year and plaintiffs in a suit against the state to act shocked and offended is disingenuous. One wants the governor’s job; the other seeks to force him to do what he doesn’t believe is in the best interests of Alaska and Alaska students.

The majority of Ketchikan voters elected the Borough Assembly. We are responsible for what they do on our behalf. Maybe this lawsuit is what we want. But then we must be ready to accept any consequences.

We’ve started a fight, and we shouldn’t act hurt or victimized if the target of our lawsuit points out that he’s aware of that and that he just might be a little irritated by it. As we pointed out months ago, we can’t throw a punch and not expect to get hit ourselves.

Gov. Parnell also noted when commenting on the suit that most legislators don’t pay much attention to the difference between Ketchikan’s governments. We have two. One is the borough, which is suing the state. The other is the city, which hasn’t joined the lawsuit. The suit has created uneasiness between the two local governments, too.

This places the cohesiveness of the joint Ketchikan Legislative Liaison lobbying trip to Juneau in jeopardy. But Ketchikan is one community. Its officials should travel to Juneau for the purpose of lobbying as one, focusing on the liaison’s top item on the community wide priority list: expansion of the Swan Lake hydroelectric facility.

It’s the increased power that will be generated there that is of utmost importance.

Honestly, that’s what it comes to — both Gov. Parnell and community leaders focusing on what’s best for Ketchikan, and both are committed to that without a doubt.

  • Comment

Comments (8) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Karl Ashenbrenner
Karl Ashenbrenner 02/14/14 - 08:33 am
Throwing a

punch in the schoolyard and expecting to get hit is one thing. Having a Governor making comments like Parnell did is quite another. This was a threat pure and simple, you cannot dress it up and say it was something else. If he was irritated because of the lawsuit he should have kept his big mouth shut.

Frank Heart
Frank Heart 02/14/14 - 09:15 am
You decide

"When Ketchikan asks for money but yet the state might be on the hook in the lawsuit for more money, there’s kind of a reluctance or a reticence to step forward for other projects.,” Sean Parnell

No amount of lipstick will do

James Coleman
James Coleman 02/14/14 - 09:17 am
At least

At least if he was angered by someone he didn't come after them. He didn't summon government agencies like a certain president does with the IRS and EPA.

Frank Heart
Frank Heart 02/14/14 - 09:58 am
James, could you rewrite that

James, could you rewrite that so it makes sense, please?

Art Petersen
Art Petersen 02/14/14 - 11:04 am
The big apology

for the governor's threat shows how much of a threat it is. If the funding of public education were doing all right, municipalities might not be looking around the state for perceived inequalities and probably would not have filed a lawsuit. As it is, all communities in Alaska are watching as state underfunding of their public schools have forced school boards to cut maintenance, cut nurses, cut aides, cut grounds keeping, cut custodians, cut even cost of living for staff. And now teachers will have to go, a lot of them. All thanks to the governor and his legislative cohorts. So in desperation, having to look at raising even higher what all individual citizens contribute to public schools and still see public schools suffer even more, some leaders in Ketchikan had had enough and filed a lawsuit. And why not? The governor wants to squeeze public schools even more by giving state funds to religious and private for-profit schools. This apology attempts to channel the governor's human nature. For many, though, it's so over the top that it tends to demonstrate the opposite of its argument. What the governor said sounds and reads like a threat, and most of his actions and policies (his gambling a huge giveaway to oil companies, his further threats to public education, his denial of health care to people below the middle class) are threats to the future of Alaska. Where this decline for Alaska's communities will end is not known. But one thing is for sure: the apologizing is not over.

Back to Top


  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback