• Overcast, light rain
  • 54°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

Alaska Editorial: State makes a point in suing over federal failure to consider oil plan

Posted: March 18, 2014 - 11:00pm

The following editorial first appeared in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner:

Gov. Sean Parnell has taken the next step in the long-running, slow-moving effort to tap the energy resources of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge’s coastal plain, an area that Congress decades ago recognized as having high oil and gas potential.

The governor on Friday announced that the state has filed suit against the Department of the Interior and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over those agencies’ refusal to consider the state’s plan for exploratory oil and gas activity in the 1.5-million-acre coastal plain of ANWR as required by the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980.

It’s a good move and shows that the ANWR battle, although quieted nationally by an unfavorable White House and Senate, is far from over.

The source of the disagreement between the state and the federal agencies stems from a 2010-2011 Fish and Wildlife Service revising the 1988 ANWR comprehensive conservation plan, which deferred handling of the coastal plain to a 1987 ANWR resource assessment report that recommended Congress approve an oil and gas leasing program for the coastal plain.

The revision put forward by Fish and Wildlife officials didn’t include an oil and gas option but did include two options for Congress to declare the coastal plain as wilderness.

That, rightly, set off some alarms in Alaska.

The state submitted an oil and gas exploration plan in 2013 but was rejected by Fish and Wildlife. Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said authority for approving a plan expired with completion of the 1987 resource assessment report required by ANILCA.

The big flaw in the secretary’s argument, however, is that ANILCA contains no expiration date for the authority to approve a plan. The process outlined for approval of a plan of exploration activity remains on the books.

So the secretary must follow through with the process, which requires that any exploration plan submitted for approval and meeting the guidelines get at least one public comment hearing in the state and then be approved.

That hasn’t happened.

Section 1002 of ANILCA authorizes “exploratory activity within the coastal plain.” It defines the activity as “surface geological exploration or seismic exploration, or both, for oil and gas within the coastal plain.”

And that’s what the plan submitted to the Interior Department by Gov. Parnell proposes: 3-D seismic testing to obtain up-to-date information about the coastal plain, which the U.S. Energy Information Administration describes as “the largest unexplored, potentially productive onshore basin in the United States.”

It is hoped, of course, that fresh and fuller information about ANWR’s oil and gas potential will convince Congress and a future president —President Obama will never do it — to allow oil and gas development in the coastal plain.

We’re arguing over an area that Congress has already recognized as having high energy potential. Refusal by the Interior Department and the Fish and Wildlife Service to follow a process that exists in law cannot go unchallenged.

The state seems to have a good case to make. Alaskans — Republicans, Democrats and others — should support the governor in this action.

  • Comment

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Tom Leston
Tom Leston 03/19/14 - 08:24 am
This is federal land so that

This is federal land so that means it would be federal oil/gas going into the pipes, and Alaskans would see very little return on this. Instead of returns, Alaskans will foot the bill for this costly battle, which the oil industry should pay for. In conclusion, this is not for Alaskans it is once again our oil lobbyist governor, Sean Parnell, using state resources, public money, our Governors house and state employees to lobby on behalf of and for the benefit of the oil industry.
We need to get this oil lobbyist out of our Governors house.

James Coleman
James Coleman 03/19/14 - 08:58 am
What else do we do?

The great President Obama always says what a wealthy nation we are. No, the USA is broke and living off a Chinese credit card. Alaska is starting to feel the pinch and was advised to cut spending by $1.5B. We can't live off our good looks, we need a dependable revenue source on both a national and state level. Let's start doing something.

Tom Leston
Tom Leston 03/19/14 - 11:12 am
public financed elections is the only way out of this mess

There is more than one way to measure a countries wealth. GDP on a finite planet is not a good measure. Realize GDP goes up relative to a storms damage. Time to go back to the drawing board and fine a better way.
One thing for sure is, we will all be better off when the oil industry no longer has a hold on congress. We need to get money out of politics and just have public financed elections

James Coleman
James Coleman 03/19/14 - 04:58 pm
Public financed?

Public financed elections are great. But not public financed election campaigns. No more Obamaphones, No more Obama flying around the country in Air Force One campaigning and flying to fund raising dinners, and no more flooding the country with immigrants who are indoctrinated to vote for the Democrats. Yeah, lets get back to basics.

Back to Top


  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback