• Overcast, light rain
  • 54°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

My Turn: Public voices stifled in resource management

Posted: August 13, 2014 - 11:04pm

Alaskans recently watched horrific images from a tailings dam failure in British Columbia that released a flood of millions of gallons of toxic water and sludge into an important watershed, just in advance of the salmon return. We witnessed the devastated landscape and heartbroken people facing terrible unknowns about the future of their communities, their food and their livelihoods.

As our hearts go out to our neighbors, we realize the Mount Polley Mine tailings dam breach is an important wake-up call for us in Alaska. It reminds us of the awesome responsibility we have in managing our natural resources. Despite our best intentions, as Mount Polley vividly illustrates, things can and do go wrong.

Alaska has many examples of responsibly developed and managed mines — I live near two of them, Greens Creek and Kensington, and I am a strong proponent of this type of development. At the same time, the Mount Polley failure compels us to re-examine our own commitment to guarding against such catastrophe. Our clean water and fisheries are the lifeblood of our people and our state.

Unfortunately, in recent years that commitment has been lacking. Gov. Sean Parnell has not listened to the majority of the people of Bristol Bay, and indeed, the majority of Alaskans, on the Pebble issue, fail to even acknowledge the risks involved in such development and joining lawsuits with Canadian mining interests against the interests of Alaskans. This pattern of ignoring the voices of Alaskans is one of the reasons I am running for governor.

More recently, Parnell has remained absent on efforts to ensure that mining development on the Canadian side of the border does not adversely affect our nearly $1 billion per year commercial, sport and subsistence fishery in Southeast. It is not difficult to see how problems at the Canadian Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell Mine at the headwaters of the Unuk River east of Ketchikan, for example, could threaten our communities and fishermen downstream.

Months ago, Alaska’s congressional delegation raised concerns to the State Department about this very issue. That’s good leadership in Alaska’s interest. On the other hand, the state took no action. Even in the wake of the devastation at Mount Polley, Parnell has remained silent when he should be publicly demanding high-level review of KSM and other transboundary mines with his counterparts in the Canadian and provincial governments.

These are but the latest examples of the lack of leadership. In the last two sessions, Parnell introduced HB77 — legislation to weaken our natural resource permitting system, remove safeguards and gut the public process. Not only does such legislation call into question our state government’s commitment to responsible, balanced resource management, but its commitment to our constitutional rights as Alaskans. Perhaps the most disturbing and undemocratic aspect of HB77 was its attempt to silence Alaskans, to muffle the voices of those who would raise concerns and objections.

Alaskans deserve better. We must bring Alaskans’ voices back to the table. There is no more important task that the governor of Alaska is entrusted with than to facilitate the responsible management of resources, ensuring the maximum benefit to our people in terms of jobs, economic activity, abundant fish and wildlife, clean air and water, and protection of our unique Alaskan way of life.

As director of the Permanent Fund, entrusted with one of Alaskans’ most important financial assets, and as a mayor and as a CEO, I have wrestled firsthand with the challenging balance between risk and reward, the balance between thoughtful, responsible development and safeguarding our natural resources. I am deeply committed to ensuring such balance for all Alaskans.

• Byron Mallott is a Democrat running for governor.

  • Comment

Comments (7) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Brad Fluetsch
Brad Fluetsch 08/14/14 - 06:52 am
So Byron,

Should Sealaska listen to the majority of Alaskans voices regarding their land bill? Bad public policy BIM, and given the land bill, pretty hypocritical position you put yourself in...

Karl Ashenbrenner
Karl Ashenbrenner 08/14/14 - 08:25 am
Apples and Oranges

Brad, apples and oranges.

Brad Fluetsch
Brad Fluetsch 08/14/14 - 08:56 am
How do you figure?

The overwhelming public comment from POW is against Sealaska's Land bill, so what it is only a dozen folks with really loud mouths and willing media. The majority of the public makes no comment at all, neither for or against. No Karl, it is a bullseye, on target, to the point (heart of the matter)

What I hear Byron saying, his public policy will be based on the loudest mouths in Alaska with the most money to say it, regardless of science or the permitting process. Frankly, that should scare every Alaskan with a resource based job.

Haily George
Haily George 08/14/14 - 09:04 am
anyone but Parnell

The fact is anyone will be better for Alaskans than Sean Parnell.

Sean Parnell will be up against Mallot or Walker. I will take either one over Parnell.

Dana Ruaro
Dana Ruaro 08/17/14 - 05:52 am
Response as a Sealaska Shareholder

Alaskans and Sealaska shareholders deserve better than spin. If Mr. Mallott, (who is a nice man) believes the voices of individuals should be heard, he should publicly commit to supporting term limits for members of the Sealaska Board and oppose the current election process for Board members. The current process allows sitting members of the Board to take and use votes of shareholders to make sure their friends on the Board are reelected. Until Mallott commits to a fair election process for his own shareholders and tribal members, his calls for Alaskans to be at the table are empty.

As to Pebble, the State of Alaska has a permitting process that is tough and thorough. That’s why we have had six large operating mines and record salmon returns for decades. As to Pebble, Governor Parnell has said the project needs to be reviewed and put through both the state and federal permitting process that all mines have to go through. The point is, that Alaskans were promised at least a chance to develop their state lands by the federal government. This is an important promise to Alaskans that deserves a lot more respect than an EPA veto of a project driven by the personal agenda of a green leaning biologist at EPA who has now disappeared along with his emails to avoid answering questions by Congress. (ANCSA corporations like mine, (Sealaska) were promised the same opportunity to develop resources on its lands) Many Alaska Natives that live inland want the jobs Pebble would provide in the decade it would take to perform thousands of studies required by the state and federal government to support applications for dozens of duplicative local, state, and federal permits. The point is, let the project go through the permit process. If it cannot show it would meet EPA required water standards, it won’t be built.

Back to Top


  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback