My Turn: State’s AlaskaCare Retiree Health Plan needs administrator oversight

  • By FREDA MILLER
  • Monday, September 19, 2016 1:00am
  • Opinion

On Jan. 1, 2014, Mike Barnhill, deputy commissioner of the Department of Administration, implemented a new appeal process for the state’s AlaskaCare Health Plans. He stated in a town hall meeting that this was done because Division of Retirement and Benefits personnel who oversee the AlaskaCare Health Plans were making medical decisions on claim appeals without medical knowledge.

In July 2015, two meniscus tears were repaired in my left knee. Anyone who has had painful meniscus tears knows that only surgical repair can be done to fix the damage. My health insurance, AlaskaCare, denied coverage for the surgery saying that it was not medically necessary (according to their third party administrator, currently Aetna, using their proprietary “Coverage Policy Bulletins”). The surgical center and anesthesiologist’s bills were both paid! That’s another Letter to the Editor story…

I appealed to Aetna two separate times (as required by the plan before appealing to the Office of Administrative Hearings), which takes months and months. Both appeals were denied. Then, almost one year after the surgery, I appealed a final time to the Office of Administrative Hearings, the final appeal rights afforded to AlaskaCare covered members after Jan. 1, 2014. Amazingly, when my appeal reached the Division of Retirement and Benefits, their “Chief Health Official” determined that the surgery was medically necessary and AlaskaCare paid the surgeon. No Office of Administrative Hearings appeal! I received the notice of payment from Aetna a full three weeks before I received my official letter of notification by the Division of Retirement and Benefits, signed by the State’s “Chief Health Official”.

My point, if medical necessity determinations are still being made by non-medical people within the Division, through a process that is neither offered in the plan nor notified of being available, then why change the appeal process? If Mr. Barnhill would have only checked with General Services he could’ve seen proof that the State’s previous process on administrator appeals for medical necessity was to have an Independent Review Organization physician review those claims as a contractor working for the plan. Who’s minding Aetna’s coverage of AlaskaCare benefits, and how has the change in appeals helped? How many retirees’ claims have been denied in error when they would be covered if the Plan Administrator simply saw them? While Aetna should not be allowed to make determinations based on their own commercial “Coverage Policy Bulletins”, especially when their denials are overturned quickly and soundly by the Division of Retirement and Benefits, over a year later, by someone who is not a medically trained person, changing the entire appeal process was not the answer.

Oversight of the plan’s third party administrators’ actions is the state’s responsibility. If changes to processes are made, they should make the health plan better, not worse. And truth should always be in the forefront.

• Freda Miller is a Customer Service Team Lead for Aetna (AlaskaCare) 1997-2004, and a Benefits Manager, Division of Retirement and Benefits 2004-2009.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

The Aiviq, a private icebreaker the U.S. Coast Guard is considering purchasing for Arctic operations with Juneau as its home port, is seen on March 24, 2012. (Courtesy of the U.S. Coast Guard)
Opinion: Giving credit where credit is due

It’s been a long time since the Juneau economy has been bolstered… Continue reading

Gus Schumacher, an Anchorage cross-country skier, testifies at a Senate Budget Committee hearing last Wednesday. (Budget committee screenshot)
An Alaska Olympian went to D.C. to testify on climate change. Then a senator dredged up old tweets.

Gus Schumacher hit with climate science quiz in exchange that went viral in conservative circles.

U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, second from right, attends a bill signing by President Donald Trump on Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018, in the Oval Office of the White House. (Official White House photo)
Opinion: Sen. Dan Sullivan, a conservative in name only

It’s easy to imagine Sen. Lisa Murkowski broke out in a smile… Continue reading

(Anne Onamuss / For the Juneau Empire)
My Turn: Alaska’s deepest trouble is nonsupport of education

People are exiting The Great Land and are reluctant to come here… Continue reading

The studio model of Starship “Enterprise” from Star Trek is on display at The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum on its reopening on Oct. 14, 2022, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Opinion: No Alaska governor has ever so boldly held schools and students as political hostages

“Star Trek” reference looks past real argument for school funding.

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Black-and-white view of Gaza goes too far

Alexander Dolitsky’s letter rebuffing Dixie Belcher’s attempt to humanize the tragedy unfolding… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Murkowski and Sullivan should oppose Trump

The New York Times reported Saturday that Mr. Trump said, “some migrants… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: If you see roadside rubbish, please pick it up

I met a young Tlingit lady and her friend this weekend, picking… Continue reading

Looking up at the 1882 Edward Webster House on Telephone Hill from Second Street and Main Street in January 2024. (Photo by Laurie Craig)
Opinion: Juneau Assembly holds firm on Telephone Hill development

In a rare moment of near unanimity during a special Assembly meeting… Continue reading