At the beginning of July last year, my partner Rick and I embarked on a week-long paddling adventure in Canada’s Yukon Territory after a frenzy of last-minute packing. Unfortunately, we realized on our first night camping that several important items never made it into our packs. Our food supplies were limited by the amount of space we had in our bear canister, leaving little extra food for unexpected delays in the wilderness. We also forgot to bring teas to warm us on chilly northern mornings and wind-blasted evenings. As a final testament to our forgetfulness, the first-aid kit was missing a few odds and ends that should have been replenished after our last expedition.
Even the most experienced hikers and campers sometimes forget important items that could be useful in emergency situations. Basic knowledge about local plants and their potential uses can make all the difference in ensuring safety and survival in the wilderness. Fortunately, some edible or medicinal plants in Alaska and Canada are the most easily identifiable plants and are likely to be available, in one way or another, when needed.
Before manufactured pharmaceutical drugs, people throughout the world relied on traditional remedies from local plants and natural resources. Many edible plants are also medicinal plants that can treat a wide range of ailments. Some plants can be extremely dangerous for the inexperienced forager, so it is important to distinguish between plants that help from those that harm. A good working knowledge of plants in the wilderness allows our surrounding environment to serve as a natural pharmacy when our modern medicines are not easily accessible.
Dr. Kristin Cox, ND, at Rainforest Naturopathic Medicine in Juneau doesn’t always take a first aid kit with her when she goes hiking.
“But I do make sure to observe and to be aware of what can be used in the forest, especially the most common plants,” she said.
For instance, alder (Alnus species) is a common shrub or tree found alongside rivers and open areas. For first aid, Cox uses fresh alder leaves as bandages.
“The leaves stick really well to the skin to cover blisters and other wounds. They contain medicinal components to help the healing process,” she said.
Another common shrub found throughout Alaska is willow (Salix species). The bark and leaves contain salicin, she said, a medicinal constituent found in aspirin. Brewing a tea or chewing on the bark and leaves can alleviate headaches, pains and fevers.
During the trip, Rick and I relied on our foraging skills and plant knowledge to recognize plants that would aid us in the event of an emergency. When in doubt, we left unfamiliar plants alone, even if they “looked” medicinal. If we had taken time to learn more about the Yukon plants before the trip, we would have been able to supplement our limited supplies with an even greater variety of wild medicines and foraged edibles. Nevertheless, our combined knowledge of Pacific coastal rainforests partially prepared us for survival since some plants in boreal forests of the Yukon were the same, or closely related, to those found in Southeast Alaska.
In my search for teas, I immediately spied the feathery green leaves of yarrow (Achillea species). A powerful medicinal herb, the leaves and flowers can also be eaten, powdered into seasoning, or used as a tea. The leaves soon became a regular guest in my mug to accompany wind-swept afternoons on the banks of the Yukon River. The wild-foraged teas provided an additional bonus. Unlike store-bought tea bags that have to be packed out with the rest of our trash, the dregs of foraged teas could be left behind to return to the earth.
In locations where yarrow was less abundant, fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium) leaves, flowers, and buds added floral flavors to my teatime. For upset stomachs, this tea would have been a soothing digestive remedy. Since most parts of the plant are edible, fireweed could have been added to the dinner menu if survival food was needed.
Everywhere we went, the fragrance of blooming roses greeted our senses. Prickly rose (Rosa acicularis) stems and roots can be used in teas according to some guides. Rose hips, the bright red fruit that remains after the flower is gone, are an excellent source of vitamin C. They are collected in the fall after the first frost and cooked after the seeds are removed. Because it was not rose hip season yet, the rose petals made a delicious perfumed trail snack and tea. For minor wounds, moistened rose petals would have been useful to cover minor cuts as a make-shift bandage.
In the end, the paddling trip was a success without any major incidents. Our forays into foraging for medicinal plants served as an excellent reminder for this crew to continue to improve our plant knowledge for future adventures.
As with any skill, learning to identify medicinal plants and their uses takes time, practice and patience. By being able to recognize and properly handle medicinal gifts from the forests, even the most forgetful forager can be prepared to adapt to emergency situations in the wilderness.
• Jennifer Nu is a freelance writer living in Juneau, Alaska.




Comments (11)
Add commentNaturopathy
"They contain medicinal components to help the healing process."
Please name one.
Mike
credibility...................
Naturopathy is nothing more than smoke and mirrors. Double blind studies done by such credible research facilities as The Mayo Clinic and Centers for Disease Control have shown again and again that naturopathic treatments provide no better value to patients than do placebo pills. Naturopaths are NOT medical doctors. They must practice under the license of a medical doctor, supervised (we hope closely) in order to assure that the "root lady" treatments they provide dont harm anyone.
Mike, I am guessing that Ms. Cox cant name the medicinal components she refers to. You and I both know from our professional exposure to these "clinicians" that they are not well followed and not broadly accepted in the medical community. Their privileges are significantly limited for good reasons.
One must do extensive research before accepting any "medical" advise from such a provider. It is really a buyer beware market in naturopathy. Sadly, many trusting and unsuspecting souls fall victim to these providers. They'd be better off going to a veterinarian !! (sorry Mike !!)
Perhaps next time Jennifer Nu wants to be published, she would choose a more credible subject matter.
@Concerned Citizen:
@Concerned Citizen: naturopathy is not "smoke and mirrors." The problem with the alternative medicine movement, as a whole, is that everyone seems to lump everything together. Reflexology, homeopathy, massage therapy--all of them get lumped into one category, when in fact, some are valid and some are not.
This article deals with herbalism, the practice of utilizing herbs for their medical benefits. Given that many modern treatments are essentially just concentrated forms of certain plant components, and that many of us practice herbalism unknowingly on a regular basis (ever drink peppermint tea for an upset stomach? Apply comfrey tincture to an injury? Use witch hazel to rinse your mouth? Drink green tea to calm your nerves? That is herbalism.), it's awfully hard to call it a crock.
Herbalism, these days, relies on both science and tradition. Science has proven many treatments effective (St. John's Wort for depression, Valerian Root for insomnia, All-Heal for minor cuts/abrasions, etc.), and often that science merely verifies a traditional use of that plant. Sometimes science invalidates it, too, or at least fails to support it.
It's also important to note that in most states (Alaska included, I think, though I'm not entirely certain), to be a certified naturopath, you must have completed the basic requirements to be a doctor.
And Mike, Alder contains salacin and tannin components that act to constrict the blood vessels, inhibit microbial growth, and reduce inflammation. Those would be the medicinal components.
As a rule of thumb, herbalism and some other forms of alternative medicine are excellent alternatives to over-the-counter drugs and can be as effective or moreso, typically with fewer side effects. But they are never a substitute for conventional medicine in a life threatening situation.
Pro Alternative . . .
In my opinion, naturopathy & homeopathy are valid and effective treatments for many chronic conditions. They do not replace medical treatment for acute conditions but they are much more effective for chronic conditions that regular medicine can't diagnose... To be effective, the patient must have a certain sensitivity but then, watch out - dramatic effects can occur. I am one of the lucky sensitive ones; lucky because with homeopathy, there are no side effects. I remain a dedicated user of homeopathy and flower essences formulas
placebo treatment has its place !
Momoflily: If you are happy visiting a root lady then more power to you. Scientific evidence refutes your opinion. Evidence based research clearly indicates that you are experiencing a placebo effect ("certain sensitivity"). Homeopathy is NOT without side effects. Many herbs react dangerously with over the counter or prescription medications. Many hidden health conditions can be exascerbated by homeopathic remedies. Many people grow sicker and some die using such treatments. I prefer carefully researched and tested methods of treatment. I wont begrudge you your opinion, but caution you to go forward informed.
@persnikety persimmon/ medicinal components /naturopathy
Yes, though I haven't researched if your claims are correct, I can generally accept your claim for medicinal components in those substances.
The challenge that I wanted to get to with my question is terminology and theory behind methodology. Evidence, proof, effectiveness, etc., mean different things to practitioners of science-based medicine versus practitioners who sometimes, though not always, mix truth with faith-based medicine.
There is no meaningful comparison to be made between the requirements for the ND degree and the MD degree.
This is paramount to understand: appeals to authority versus appeals to evidence. Knowing this difference separates individuals, who can be guilty of being bad doctors, from the foundational theory guiding their respective methods. Science-based medical theory is sound, naturopathy is unsound; this is why I don't even have to to discuss specific "treatments."
I am embarrassed for Alaska that it is one of the few states (due to politics, Big Placebo, and Big Herba, not science) that licenses bona-fide quackery. Senator Orin Hatch (Utah) is a gigantic influence in maintaining the quack industry's "medicinal components" supply because it brings tons of money to his state. In fact, our own Rep. Cathy Munoz sponsored a bill last session to grant naturopaths Big Pharma prescribing rights. I'm glad the bill died a "natural" death.
Naturopathy at its heart is riddled with quackery. It is only because time is finite that I won't express here the magnitude of quackery that is inseparable from their formal education be it 100% online or at one of their few "colleges". Simply put, they speak a different language; the language of faith healing, not science based medicine.
Mike
A great source of plant knowledge.
I believe Carol Biggs publishes two books that give a lot of information on this very subject?
Herbs and Other Wild Things
There are societies and cultures that have for generations - even thousands of years - routinely used herbs and other plants that the white mainstream looks at askance. Think of devils club, the labrador bush and fox glove. There are dozens more.
The good thing in life is that we don't have to learn everything the hard way- we can learn from each other.
I remember a professor once telling the class that there was "no way" he would ever eat homecanned food. My question to him was: Where does he think that the canning industry got their start?
Herbs and Other Wild Things
Sorry- I'm erasing the duplicated post.
I completely agree with Mike
I completely agree with Mike that conventional medicine is so much better than homeopothy. All one has to do is watch TV and you can see the Pharma commercials which extoll the many blessings which come with "modern science based medicine". Are you feeling (insert any ailment here)? Take (Insert unpronouncable Pharma name here) Do not take this medication if you are depressed, pregnant, of child bearing years, may cause internal bleeding, depression, suicidal thoughts, sexual dysfunction, rectal bleeding and leakage, ulcers, permanent hearing loss, temporary paralysis.
That sounds so much better than taking garlic to cure a cold, where the side effects are body odor, bad breath and gas.
@ kpawsuh / homeopathy
I wouldn't characterize my stance, as you do, as caring about what is "better" but rather caring about what is evidence/science based, plausible and true.
There are plenty of things I can do to feel "better" but that doesn't make it safe, legitimate, or praiseworthy.
Mike