Alaska’s landscape can be rough, its weather unforgiving and journeying across it a feat for most. Now, toss in a baby and a toddler.
It’s fair to say the adventure just got much more interesting.
Trekkers Erin McKittrick and Bretwood (Hig) Higman, of Seldovia, are gearing up for a two-month expedition on one of North America’s largest glaciers this fall — and they’re bringing their children — Lituya, 8 months, and Katmai, 2 1/2.
McKittrick and Higman are experienced wilderness travellers and their experiences range from pack-rafting from Seattle to the Aleutian Islands to on-foot expeditions in the Arctic. Their yearlong journey through and beyond Alaska’s panhandle is chronicled in McKittrick’s book “A Long Trek Home: 4,000 Miles by Boot, Raft, and Ski.”
Their latest adventure echoes their mission of boots-on-the-ground environmental reconnaissance and they call the plan “Life on Ice.” It will involve human-powered travel between a series of base camps on the ice of Malaspina Glacier and across the terrain surrounding this glacier, which is roughly 40 miles wide and 25 miles long. The family will tour the stormy ocean coast and explore the impacts of climate change on the shrinking glacier.
The pair first experienced the Malaspina Glacier when they moved northward during their 2007 trek. It is located on the remote Gulf of Alaska Coast, about 250 miles northwest of Juneau.
“It’s just an amazing place,” Higman said. “There are forests growing on the ice, super-cooled ice springs, sea lions on the coast, bears, amazing fall storms ... And the glacier is shrinking so quickly that it’s a great spot to see the power of climate change.”
“It’s an opportunity to watch everything in fast forward,” McKittrick said.
But why bring the kids on such an adventure? McKittrick and Higman believe sharing such an experience with their children will open their eyes to things that would otherwise go overlooked.
“It’s kind of fun to hang out with someone who will get excited about a flock of seagulls,” McKittrick said. “And two whole months to explore outside with your parents — what could a kid like more?”
Katmai has already traveled more than 500 miles by foot and raft with his parents, but this will be Lituya’s first journey.
“Our experience in the Arctic (in which we took Katmai), it affirms the idea of bringing the kids along. (He) had a great time,” Higman said. “Plus, they’re part of the family.”
Weather permitting, the pair will begin the journey on Thursday, Sept. 15 and end roughly two months later on Nov. 15, Higman said. They will begin their journey at a base camp situated on the shores of Malaspina Lake and work their way around the large tongue of the glacier on foot and pack-raft, turning northward and finally ending on the shores of Oily Lake. Higman said the total journey will traverse roughly 100 miles. But, he said, the overall mileage could add up to more. The family plans to set up base camps at predetermined locations along the route and embark on exploratory day trips.
When it comes to safety, the family has taken as many precautions as they can.
“We’re actually really cautious people, and we work really hard to anticipate risks,” McKittrick said.
For this trip, they will bring an electrified fence and pepper spray to discourage bears, a woodstove to warm up wet kids, and a large shelter, in addition to their standard equipment and ultralight rafts. But gear can only go so far, the family will also rely heavily on Higman and McKittrick’s decade of experience dealing with grizzly bears, wilderness navigation, wild storms and dangerous rivers.
Officially, Higman holds a doctorate in geology, while McKittrick has a master’s degree in biology.
With Southeast Alaska’s most pleasant weather already a memory, why head into the wilderness in the fall?
“You get some amazing experiences,” Higman said. “The weather is quite dynamic, which results in waterfalls that are incredible. (There are all) sorts of interesting hydraulics during big rainstorms. (And,) as photographers, the light is just a lot better this time of year.”
The family will post updates on their adventure from their wilderness outpost, sharing stories on their website and blog at www.GroundTruthTrekking.org. McKittrick also plans to recount the adventure in a book to be published by Mountaineers Books.

Comments (15)
Add commentAmazing
These people have to be 2 of the toughest people ever. Their tolerance for pain and discomfort is unparralelled. They walked and paddled from Seattle to Unimak Island in a year. See the movie and you will be blown away by how tough and resourceful these ordinary looking people are.
I'd love to se sara Palin try to do what they did the way they did it. She'd be done after 2 days.And Bristol's big fanny sooner.
Malaspina Forelands trek
Having spent a fair amount of time in the proposed area I
certainly admire these adventurers taste for bad weather.
I'd suggest fishing gear for silvers and a rifle as moose season opens there Oct. 15th, and as a deterrent if needed for bears.
Light Packers
They only carry a minimum of gear to travel light. For example, only 1 tooth brush. So a rifle and sportfish gear is out. Watch their movie of the Seattle to Aleutian trip. They had some scary bear encounters but did ok without a rifle. What are they gonna do with 600lbs of moose meat on top of a glacier? I have spent plenty of time on the Tsiu and it can sure be nasty in the fall.
Irresponsible Behavior
Children at two and half and 8 months can not possibly understand such an experience. It is irresponsible to take two babies on such a trip. Maybe if the kids were 8 or 12 years old there would be some point. I suppose the plan is to call for a rescue at taxpayers expense when something goes dreadfully wrong. It is one thing for adults to do risky things, but is another to intentionally put babies in a situation where there are so many things that can go wrong. Leave the kids with grandpa and grandma until they have some ability to fend for themselves.
Irresponsible, yes
Agree with dingdong. Child endangerment comes to mind.
These two people are proof that having a degree or two does not mean you are smart.
couldn't agree with Dingdong more......
i hesitated to say something the other day when i read this article. I think it is HIGHLY irresponsible to even THINK about taking an infant and a toddler on such a trip. They will more than likely be out of cell phone range if something catestrophic happens. The children will have no memories of this "experience" so what is the point really? It is one thing for adults to chose to expose themselves to pain and discomfort as noted in the first comment, it is quite another thing to drag your baby and toddler along for the ride. Borders on child abuse in my opinion. Stayed tuned i smell a disaster on the horizon.
Adventurous is not the same as irresponsible
It may be partly the fault of the article but they're hardly irresponsible.
They will have a bear fence, spray, and a woodstove
They will have a satellite phone which has both voice and text capacity
They have an EPIRB
They will have several visitors arriving throughout the trip, each of whom arrive by plane at a designated site (with contingency plans in place)
Is there a risk to their children in this adventure? Of course. Is there a risk to children when driving from Anchorage to Homer in the winter? Of course.
"Into the Wild" this is not...
i'll give you three guesses Ich....
and the first two don't count.......
Rescue bill
As far as the rescue bill... what makes them any different than any of the other hundreds of people who go out into the wilderness every year? Some very small percentage have to be rescued and these two are more prepared then some of them.
First off, these people
First off, these people walked from Seattle to Unimak, they are most likely not going to need a rescue. They had many situations on that trip that would make any of you cry "Uncle" and beg for the chopper to pick you up.
As for the child endangerment, less than 100 yrs ago, this was something normal. In many parts of the state, people are still living in close to this level. How is this child endangerment? Do you view the traditional Tlinget lifestyle as having endangered children? At some point in history, every culture lived in the woods without any of the safety items they will have. My goodness you are all a bunch of citified weinies!
Where is the line?
A poster on this column sees no problem with taking babies on a risky adventure. I wonder where the line is with such thinking? For instance, if a free style rock climber decided to put his baby on his back, or a parachuter takes her baby with her, or an extreme skier, or many other examples that could be cited. What it comes down to is common sense, not "a bunch of citified weinies". If Tim Treadwell wants to pet wild grizzlies and eventually become bear scat, that is his choice but the Treadwells of the world have no right to make their children do the same. Should the worst happen, the Higman children do not deserve to be trapped in a crevasse on Malaspina glacier.
It also depends on the
It also depends on the experience level of the parent. If you or I were to take our kids along, it would be risky. Hig and Erin are considered to extremely experienced. Can something bad happen? Sure. It could happen to anyone. Or they could live a mild mannered existance and get hit by a car on the way to daycare. I really dont see a problem with this. How many people in SE grew up in a logging camp? Was that overly risky? What about growing up on a fishing boat? Both of those are more dangerous than living for two months on a glacier. If you actually know anything about glaciers, they really arent that dangerous, with the proper equipment and knowledge. They are dangerous if any idiot just tries to go trotting up there on his own without any gear.
People all over the world are
People all over the world are forced into much more dangerous/harmful conditions by virtue of being born in the wrong place.
Let's have a little perspective and perhaps save the outrage for real issues.
Not all glacier are created equal
Not to mention that Malaspina is quite well covered up. Much of their trip will be closer to camping in a forest than the image many people have when they hear "glacier".