Gov. Sean Parnell and legislators continued to jockey for public support in their deadlocked battle over spending, oil taxes and threatened vetoes.
Senators took to the Senate Floor Tuesday to defend their positions, with Sen. Hollis French, D-Anchorage, saying there was legal foundation for the Senate’s strategy aimed at fending off potential Parnell vetoes.
Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka, challenged the claim from House Republican leaders the projects the Senate was proposing to spend money on had not been adequately vetted, or in some cases not even sought by anyone.
French said it all began with Parnell playing politics with the budget.
“The politics started with the governor’s proposed oil tax bill and his threat to veto capital projects if the reduction in oil taxes did not pass,” French said.
French said he acknowledged that the Senate was using “contingency” language in the state budget to try to limit the governor’s power. That’s not a new goal for legislators, he said.
The Senate Finance Committee in 1997 wrote a budget with conditional language similar to the language at issue this year that wound up before the Alaska Supreme Court, and was upheld, he said.
Parnell, then a senator, was a member of that committee, French said. Two years later Parnell was co-chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and said “I would never waive the Legislature’s rights to include conditional language in an appropriations bill,” according to French.
Late Tuesday Attorney General John Burns issued a legal opinion challenging French’s analysis.
Burns acknowledged Alaska’s governor did not have the power under his line-item veto power to strike contingency language from the budget, but said it remained unconstitutional.
That puts every project listed in that section at risk of court challenges even without a veto, Burns said.
“I’m sure the Department of Law is concerned very deeply about what we’re doing here,” French said. “I’m thinking they know we are on to something,” he said.
Senate Minority Leader Charlie Huggins, R-Wasilla, agreed with Parnell the Senate Majority was infringing on the executive branch’s constitutional powers when it tried to limit the line-item veto.
While there has been little action in public meetings, House Speaker Mike Chenault, R-Nikiski, has called a press conference for the House Majority to give its side of the stalemate Wednesday morning.
• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 586-4816 or at patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.





Comments (10)
Add commentSens. French & Stedman are Correct
I read the 2001 AK Supreme Court decision on this subject, and the clear takeaway is that the Governor can veto individual bills and he also has "line item" authority to either lower specific amounts or to veto entire appropriation items.
What he does not have is veto authority over the language contained in bills, or he could carve out any clause, sentence or section of a passed bill ready for his signature. Language is not an "item" to veto; only projects with figures attached are defined as "items". The Gov. loses this one, as he should.
Sean Parnell needs a the
Sean Parnell needs a the big'ol boot right up his tea bagging a ss for his threats to veto capital projects (many are energy projects around the state), if the reduction in oil taxes did not pass.
Democrats are the only party working for people and not corporations.
Quit the BS and just get
Quit the BS and just get done. We need to fire the lot of em!
Captain Zero needs to go back to lobbying Big Oil
Captain Zero is a Big Zero (thanks Don Young for nicknaming the governor correctly).
Zero says whatever it takes for him to benefit, even if in the final analysis his words show that he's inconsistent or is flatly not telling the truth: In 1999 he said " I would never waive the Legislature's rights to include conditional language in an appropriations bill" when he was the Senate Finance Co-Chairman. Here's some proof that he is unfit for his current line of work.
Previously he worked as an oil lobbyist and it is crystal clear that he's doing all he can do to return to that line of work when the time comes. I also suppose that Zero knows a recall is in the works and is banking on financial contributions from his oil buddies to defeat the effort.
Get rid of the Zero.
@Juneauian
Well said...except one thing- It is pretty apparent that Parnell never left his position as an oil lobbyist.
I blame us. Not for electing
I blame us. Not for electing pig headed people but for expecting our elected officials to get it all. All or nothing. My way or the highway. This is how the politicians are trying to do things and it's tearing our state apart. When trying to decide what's best for the country, state or town, it takes compromise or everyone loses.
And hey, I'm very upset with Parnell and growing more and more regretful for my vote but at least he's not Sarah Palin. Seriously.
@ALASKATU
Parnell is a male version of Palin
Not quite. Palin gave us
Not quite. Palin gave us money to like her. Parnell is only giving us lies.
Parnell the Liar
PP, pretty sad legacy, eh?
The one thing that shouldn't even be threatened is Alaska Renewable Projects. Investment in ourselves for the future. It's not mythical. It's a guaranteed payment to ourselves. We can debate how long it'll take to get our return but it will happen.
OR
We can be import our energy until every penny we spend goes to keeping lights, heat, food coming.
Parnell does NOT work for Alaskans, that much is abundantly clear. I've honestly been shocked that the Senate has been so defiant up until now. It's the first glimmer of hope I've seen of a bipartisan (nonpartisan?) effort to put Alaskans first.
It's our oil. We don't need to give it away.
Parnell needs walking papers asap.
Governing
I think that the federal government, state government, and local governments as well need to get past the "I'm going to win" mindset and get back to the basics of governing.
This is government, not the superbowl.
Peggy
Ogni casinò on line offrirà un'area di pratica dove puoi provare i giochi del casino senza spendere nulla del tuo fondo scommesse.