And Merry Christmas to the rest of you too!

Gauisus feriae, quisque.

Now get off my sidewalk!

http://www.eaec.org/bibleanswers/christmas/christians_and_christmas.htm

...Janeta's link from above. It's stupid.

Happy HoliDAZE!

Christmas has become politically incorrect, just like Halloween and Thanksgiving. Ground Hog's day is next. I'm with the Burgermeister Meisterburger on this one, "No Toys" and put Kris Kringle in jail.

So less than 25 people were part of two separate protests. In Anchorage, the state's largest city.

Why is this newsworthy? Could it be because the BS "war on Christmas" is sensational and attracts viewers?

@Milspec.: Jo was being facetious, invoking the same kind of BS you guys did against the OWS protestors.

Notice how right-wing protestors never get that kind of treatment, be they anti-Planned Parenthood protestors or Tea Party protestors or even Westboro Baptist Church protestors (and make no mistake--they are as right-wing as you can come without being an actual terrorist).

I do apologize. I admit most of my posts are drivel.
And Jo shut the **** up and have a cigarette.

Hi Jo. Please notice the lack of warmth in the imposter's words above (in addition to the upside down and distorted avatar, the self-censorship of profanity, the lack of wit, and the misspelling of my screen name). Warmth that is, of course, characteristic of everything I write. Sometimes even more than warmth: burning-hot rage.

So, who or whom assessed your intellectual level and what were their qualifications? Fact is that intelligence comes in many forms. Personally if self assessment is your method, well, we can all definitely see that you are just so brilliant.

Just say'n...

Merry Christmas everyone.

Well genius not; Who is singular and whom is plural; or is it he/him or is it she/her?

Who vs. Whom
Rule:

Use the he/him method to decide which word is correct.
he = who
him = whom

Examples:
Who/Whom wrote the letter?
He wrote the letter. Therefore, who is correct.
For who/whom should I vote?
Should I vote for him? Therefore, whom is correct.
We all know who/whom pulled that prank.
This sentence contains two clauses: We all know and who/whom pulled that prank. We are interested in the second clause because it contains the who/whom. He pulled that prank. Therefore, who is correct. (Are you starting to sound like a hooting owl yet?)
We want to know on who/whom the prank was pulled.
This sentence contains two clauses: We want to know and the prank was pulled on who/whom. Again, we are interested in the second clause because it contains the who/whom. The prank was pulled on him. Therefore, whom is correct.

Seems that genius thing is slipping away.

Smart people don't go around trying to convince people they are. It just shows. Further, any test is written just for that group. anyone not part of that group will not score as well as the group members. Further still, IQ ranks as follows:

Genius IQ is generally considered to begin around 140 to 145, representing ~.25% of the population (1 in 400). Here's a rough guide:

115-124 - Above average (e.g., university students)
125-134 - Gifted (e.g., post-graduate students)
135-144 - Highly gifted (e.g., intellectuals)
145-154 - Genius (e.g., professors)
155-164 - Genius (e.g., Nobel Prize winners)
165-179 - High genius
180-200 - Highest genius
>200 - "Unmeasurable genius"

Be advised, you fail to demonstrate much above the basic level of a typing, grammar and thesaurus use of the average college attendee; no doubt above stages of common communication as you can write and we all can see that. But just below genius? How far below? I recon that two thirds of the people blogging here are in the neighborhood of 140 or so. You don't hear us bragging.

Stick to your liberal drivel and let's call it a draw!

When one regurgitates 9th grade grammar books and IQ statistics trying to impress they have neither credibility or an audience.