ANCHORAGE — Royal Dutch Shell’s quest to drill exploratory wells in Arctic waters has received a boost with the affirmation that its federal air permits for the Chukchi Sea were properly granted.
The EPA Appeals Board on Thursday rejected challenges to the air permits brought by Alaska Native and conservation groups.
Shell Alaska spokesman Curtis Smith said in a formal announcement that the decision means Shell, for the first time, has usable air permits that will allow its drill ship, the Noble Discoverer, to work in the outer continental shelf off Alaska’s northwest coast in 2012.
“Achieving usable permits from the EPA is a very important step for Shell and one of the strongest indicators to date that we will be exploring our Beaufort and Chukchi leases in July,” Smith said.
Drilling is strongly opposed by conservation groups that contend oil companies cannot clean up a spill in ice-choked waters, and that the remote Chukchi and Beaufort seas are too far from ports, major airports and other infrastructure for an effective cleanup if there’s a blowout.
Earthjustice attorney Colin O’Brien, who represented groups that filed one of four air permit appeals, said in an email response to questions that the decision could be appealed in federal court, but that it was too early to speculate about potential next steps.
He said EPA took shortcuts when it issued the permits and failed to fully protect Arctic air quality as required by the Clean Air Act.
“These permits pave the way for Shell to emit thousands of tons of harmful air pollution into the pristine Arctic environment, at levels that may be harmful to nearby communities and the environment for years to come,” he said. “We are disappointed that the Environmental Appeals Board decided against us and allowed EPA’s permit decisions to stand.
A Shell subsidiary has applied to drill up to three exploratory wells in the Chukchi during the open water season this year and additional exploratory wells in 2013. The company hopes to use a second drill for exploratory wells in the Beaufort Sea off Alaska’s north coast, and awaits a decision on the appeal of its air permit.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management in December approved Shell’s Chukchi drilling plan with one important stipulation. The agency said Shell must stop drilling into hydrocarbon zones 38 days before sea ice is projected to engulf the drill site to make sure it has time cope with a spill or a wellhead blowout. That would cut the drilling window by about one-third.
A successful appeal of previous air permits played a part of Shell’s decision to cancel drilling for 2011. In that case, the appeals board concluded that analysis of the impact of nitrogen dioxide emissions on Alaska Native communities was too limited. The board remanded the permits to allow the agency to fix permit problems.
The appeal filed by Earthjustice contended that Shell’s new permit was based on pollution estimates that were inherently unreliable because they are based on equipment that Shell did not identify and that the EPA never intends to test.
Shell faces other hurdles before it can send its drill ships and support vessels north. The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement must approve Shell’s oil spill response plan for the Chukchi.





Comments (11)
Add commentthe technology hasn't been invented yet.
i would suggest to obama, if i had the chance - to look over their spill response plan or just delete the requirements for even having one. how about just anchoring one of those rigs in an ice flow on a calm day; then try it with storm force winds of 90 mph and gusts to 160, and then try it with a wind chill of 80 and 100 below zero. after that secenerio,imagine if this thing was leaking oil ! The chemical dispersants they use are more lethal than the leaking oil; is that in the plan? back to the drawing board .....
Finally
Looks like logic prevailed opposed to layers of needless bureaucracy and bogus environmental reports. Lets get some non-gov't jobs going and some income. However, a spill response team is needed badly. We're not going to be the only ones drilling up there, but probably the most responsible. Whovever drills in the area needs to contribute.
The oil and mining industry
The oil and mining industry is more about "wealth creation" than it is about "job creation", not to mention all the negative impacts from these two industries.
Air pollution is a real concern, the metals released create acid rain, acid waters and we have high levels of toxins already in the Arctic. This ends up in our food.
Alaskan waters have a big acidification problem. My understanding is that epa is also not requiring all the Shell ships to use the "best available technology" to reduce their air pollution, this is sad.
I think Alaska is being used to appease the masses. Our state has always been - out of sight out of mind -
what
Just wish you greenies would get a clue, every business is about creating wealth. Some are cleaner than others but none go about their businesses with destroying the environment as their main goal.
Consider this, the more money a business or corporation has to spend on frivolous law suits the more corporate shareholders put pressure on them to turn a profit, & that drives up the cost of the end product. Now consider this also anyone that's got a 401 is likely a shareholder in one or more of those corporations. Nothing wrong with oversight to assure things are done right but corporate tort reform would go a long way to limit eco- extremism.
@isldandhopper: I don't think
@isldandhopper: I don't think you have evidence to support your claims. Eco-extremism doesn't exist, except in the hands of a few fringe groups with absolutely no power.
dont need
dont really need it for you rotten fruit, but heres a bone. SEACC
Island - I am not opposed to
Island - I am not opposed to people making money, but I am opposed to the fact that private business ventures get rich utilizing public land and resources, for little costs to them, while they pollute the environment. Then they have the nerve to say its all about job creation. I say no its not, its about wealth creation for the few.
@isldandhopper: is that a
@isldandhopper: is that a bone or a big, heaping pile of BS?
Yeah, BS.
Maybe you'd be more convincing if you acted like an adult and stopped coming up with uncreative "nicknames" for posters (are you in 3rd grade?) and actually posted, you know, facts and logic rather than supposedly self-evident statements and GOP talking points.
o
Keep driving with your eyes closed, your cred is worthless
Thus the push to reestablish coastal management
Without another bureaucratic layer of appeals, permitted projects may get underway. Don't believe its about jobs, and Ak. control of our coasts. It was just another layer of obstructive challenges used to slow, stop, or cost companies out of business. Why else is SEACC Bruce (aka Juneau's mayor) leading the push to get it back?