• Overcast, light rain
  • 54°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

Costs expected to rise for new state ferry

Posted: February 8, 2012 - 1:07am
Back | Next
Michael Neussl, Deputy Commissioner, Marine Operations, Alaska Marine Highway System, left, and Marc Luiken, Commissioner for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, make a presentation in front of a Joint House/Senate Transportation Committee at the Capitol on Tuesday.  Michael Penn/Juneau Empire
Michael Penn/Juneau Empire
Michael Neussl, Deputy Commissioner, Marine Operations, Alaska Marine Highway System, left, and Marc Luiken, Commissioner for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, make a presentation in front of a Joint House/Senate Transportation Committee at the Capitol on Tuesday.

The new Alaska-class ferry the Alaska Marine Highway System is in the process of getting built is likely to cost more that the $120 million already set aside for its construction, the Legislature was told Tuesday.

“That $120 million is based on an estimate that’s a couple of years old,” said Mike Neussl, deputy commissioner for marine operations for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities.

Neussl was testifying before a joint meeting of the House and Senate Transportation Committees reviewing department operations.

Costs are likely rising, and changes that have been made to the project after design work on the new vessel began are likely to result in a higher cost that previously thought, Neussl said. He did not provide a new cost estimate.

The new ferry is designed to be a highly efficient ship to add to the fleet as the state tries to reduce future operating costs. It is expected to take less crew to operate and burn less fuel than existing ferries.

The Alaska-class vessel is likely to be built in Ketchikan, and Alaska Ship & Drydock, based in that city, has been selected as the construction manager/general contractor for that project.

News broke Tuesday that Alaska Ship & Drydock, which operates the state-owned shipyard, may be bought out by Vigor Industrial, a privately held shipbuilder. Vigor owns Todd Shipyards in Seattle, Cascade General’s shipyard in Portland and other West Coast shipyards.

Neussl said he didn’t know yet what the impact of the sale would have on Alaska, and that he’d only heard of the deal a few hours earlier.

Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka, who represents Ketchikan, said elsewhere that the purchase by the larger company could make Alaska Ship & Drydock a stronger company.

“It will enable them to have access to capital, have access to some specialized labor pools, and put Alaska Ship & Drydock in better position to go after larger ships,” he said.

The state has been trying to build a shipbuilding industry in Ketchikan, and has been steering AMHS work to the shipyard there. The shipyard itself is owned by the state’s Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, and operated by Alaska Ship & Drydock.

The state-owned shipyard is not being sold, only the company that operates it.

Stedman said a stronger company would be better able to win new work, benefitting Alaska.

The ownership by Vigor will “put that shipyard in better position to participate in the build-out of the fishing fleets that are coming,” Stedman said.

The sale is also likely to bring additional shipbuilding work to the state as Alaska and the Arctic expand their oil industry infrastructure, he said.

Alaska Ship & Drydock was selected to construct the new ferry after Department of Transportation Commissioner Marc Luiken issued a finding that it was in the state’s interest to build the ferry in Alaska.

While it will not be required to bid on the construction contract, it will still have to negotiate a price the state considers fair, state officials said.

Sen. Charlie Huggins, R-Wasilla, congratulated Luiken for the finding.

“Investing Alaskans’ money in Alaska is an important concept,” he said.

In addition to progress on the new ferry, Neussl said the AMHS had improved its flexibility with two new dock projects in Hoonah and Angoon. The rebuilt docks there now allow both standard ferries and fast ferries to be used the same docks despite different ramp configurations.

The Angoon dock can also be used by Alaska Marine Lines to ship propane to the village, which doesn’t have another dock capable of that.

The new docks there don’t have catwalks out to the dolphins to which the vessels tie up, Neussl said.

“They’re self-mooring, they don’t need line handlers to do that,” he said.

Instead, the ferry crews can moor the vessels themselves, Neussl said.

• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.

  • Comment

Comments (10)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
snagger
16
Points
snagger 02/08/12 - 07:33 am
0
0

$$$$$$$$$

Ex Coasties have very little experience with cost control; double that 120 million and there won't be enough!!

GJSmith
23
Points
GJSmith 02/08/12 - 08:07 am
0
0

Public Comment Period

Scoping comments for the Juneau Access project are due by February 20, 2012.

http://dot.alaska.gov/sereg/projects/juneau_access/feedback.shtml

Ratfishtim
34
Points
Ratfishtim 02/08/12 - 08:16 am
0
0

Building Alaska Ferries in Alaska Good for the Region and State

Senator Stedman also hit the nail right on the head with his comments about the acquisition of Alaska Ship & Drydock creating a stronger company.

I wonder why there was no comment from Ketchikan's state representative. Oh yeah, I forgot, there is a Love Caucus junket to the nation's capital.

alaskabobc
48
Points
alaskabobc 02/08/12 - 08:17 am
0
0

Scary!

There are so many problems outlined in this article it makes one wonder if a "do-over" is needed. Alaska money spent in Alaska going to "whom"? A larger pool of workers? From where? No solid cost figure? Investing in Alaska through what company? Viger ind.? Far too many questions left open.

Build a road instead

isldandhopper
70
Points
isldandhopper 02/08/12 - 10:50 am
0
0

pretty

Getting information (or straight answers) from politicians is never easy & its not likely the empires fault, but this is some pretty thin soup

Kenb41
-10
Points
Kenb41 02/08/12 - 02:29 pm
0
0

The "Alaska Class" ferries need to be stopped now

It would make MUCH more sense to build new ferries with the same amenities as the traditional boats...we have the federal money to do it anyway.

With few staterooms and no galley, the "Alaska Class" boats will not be suitable to the large number of families who use the Marine Highway system...and the get out and drive fifty miles between terminals thing simply won't work.

Spend the money to do it right-don't build inferior boats just to put union workers out of jobs. Doing that ends up biting the state in the hiney later anyway...as the "fast ferries" proved.

Angelcrusher
-1
Points
Angelcrusher 02/08/12 - 06:28 pm
0
0

It's interesting that all

It's interesting that all this is happening the same time Vigor buys Alaska Ship & Drydock. One has to wonder if the new Alaska class ferry will actually be built in Ketchikan, or if Vigor just needed a foot in the Alaska door to secure the contract. Maybe most of it will be built in Seattle or Portland and "assembled" up here...

AH HA
4
Points
AH HA 02/08/12 - 10:10 pm
0
0

Taking bets..

The first one of these will not come in under $400 million.

Aankadaxtseen
0
Points
Aankadaxtseen 02/09/12 - 06:42 am
0
0

What I understand...taku

What I understand...taku size, be used for day runs, no staterooms, large lounge areas, etc.
120 million still a lot of money but built in Alaska it will be worth the money and most of the money stays in Alaska and Ketchikan. Good sense to me.
The Bellingham routes will stay in place til replace the aging fleet. They are thinking 10 more years for them.

Good economic development for Ketchikan Ship yard regardless who owns it. Alaska Made sounds good to me.

Trust Me
0
Points
Trust Me 02/10/12 - 07:35 pm
0
0

Build the road

Build the road! An idea that is as simple from an engineering perspective as it is cheap from the financial one!

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376083/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375478/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376058/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375998/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375678/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/374383/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/375278/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376063/
My Gallery

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-523-2295
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING