Some top leaders in the House of Representatives say they want to do more for villages and others struggling with high power costs, but they’re wary of increasing funds for the state’s Power Cost Equalization program.
That program helps subsidize a portion of electric costs in communities on diesel power, partially linking their rates to an average of rates in Anchorage, Fairbanks and Juneau.
PCE subsidizes the first 500 kilowatt-hours used per month, but only applies to residences and community facilities, not commercial enterprises.
Further, Fairbanks’ heavy reliance on burning oil for power means that city’s rates are somewhat reducing the benefit in the small communities.
Legislators are considering a variety of proposals for expanding help through PCE, as well as other one-time energy cost benefits to Alaskans.
House Speaker Mike Chenault, R-Nikiski, told reporters Monday he understood the need, but wasn’t sure that any of the proposals were the right way to go.
“I know that people need relief, but that’s one shot in the arm that may certainly get people through the next year, but you are going to still have the same problem the following year and the following year,” he said.
He said he’d prefer investments in permanent solutions, such as expansions of power grids or new power sources, to keep the issue from coming back year after year.
“Would it not be better to spend that money on long-term fixes, versus a one-time payout?” he asked.
He acknowledged he didn’t have any readily available solutions to propose.
“That’s easier said than done, given the size of our state and how people are spread out in smaller communities,” he said.
House Majority Leader Alan Austerman, R-Kodiak, said he had some worries about a program that would add businesses to those eligible for PCE subsidies.
“Does it drag the whole program down?” he asked, if residents would be getting less money because business or schools were getting some of the money allocated for PCE payments.
At a recent Native Issues Forum in Juneau, Jodi Mitchell, general manager of Inside Passage Electric Cooperative, said while the utility was working on long-term solutions too, high costs were driving businesses and economic opportunity out of villages.
IPEC provides power in Kake, Angoon and other isolated Southeast communities.
It’s possible a program could be crafted to help mom-and-pop stores but not other commercial enterprises, Austerman said. That could help with the high cost of living there, he said.
Schools definitely should not get PCE, he said.
That would both risk diluting help to residents and is already provided for by the Legislature elsewhere in the budget, he said.
Lots of people in the state are suffering high energy costs, and Chenault said the difficulty for the Legislature is how to provide help to those who need it the most.
“I know that diesel fuel in Kenai costs more than it does in Fairbanks,” he said. “I know that it costs less than it does in Bethel, but I know it’s more than it is in other areas of the state.”
• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or at patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.





Comments (13)
Add commentreality
There has to be a bit of reality when it comes to choosing to live in some remote area. I've lived in a smaller community, not a tiny village, for a long time. I chose to live there. With my choice to live there came the higher cost of everything. I find that no different than when I lived 40 miles away from a major city in the lower 48. It just cost more for goods when the competition, sales volume and other factors are put together. We all know Wall-mart, Target and other big box stores are able to sell for less for a number of reasons. And we know none of those stores could operate in a remote village of 200 residents.
Why stop at power equalization alone as an item for the legislature to fund? Why don't we have grocery, fuel oil, phone subsidies as well? After all those all cost more when you live outside the big city.
Agree with islander
While I oppose PCE by itself, I support developing sustainable solutions with State support.
Higher efficiency should be the first goal. Take a piece of that PCE funding and use it to buy LED lights instead. And high efficiency appliances, building upgrades, etc. Why spend money to subsidize an inefficient system?
Renewable energy systems in the villages should be a no-brainer.
energy
What about taking some of that money and investing in geo-thermal and tidal energy for the villages? And if our Gov & legislature are getting ready to hand a $2 billion per year tax break to oil companies reporting billion dollar profits, why is there no deal in that agreement for lower oil prices for Alaskans in that give-away.
Our state has the resources
Our state has the resources to develop cheaper CLEANER energy and this is what we should be doing, not expanding coal operations in this state.
Alaskans need to take notice here for 2012 elections. Which legislators are keeping our state tied to oil, coal, "dirty energy" and vote these fossils out of office.
There is not excuse for our state to be into dirty energy.
Lets spend some money and
Lets spend some money and build a number of Geo Thermal plants up north and in southeast Alaska. Lets get our kids trained on this technology instead of sending them into the pits with a pick and a shovel!
I am tired of subsidizing
I am tired of subsidizing folks that can't "cut it" in bigger towns.
These people move to remote places and then depend on the rest of us to support them, by letting them log our valuable public land, by subsidizing there energy.
I say if they need work move where the work is, if they want cheaper energy or cheaper food then move just like the rest of us do.
I would love to live in one of our smaller towns in SE but I can't afford it. So I am here working paying a mortagae, my taxes, all my bills, and there is not one person offering me a tax break or a bail out!
Speaking to Southeast's concerns
I don't know why there isn't an all out blitz for an intertie/power grid from our local legislators in support of a plan that is already there. PCE is so wrong because it doesn't support business's and to say that schools shouldn't be included is beyond my (uninformed?) comprehension. Even PCE supported communities pay nearly 3 times the rate that say Juneau or Sitka does after the bottom line. So while it helps, we're still feeling the affects of the high costs of burning diesel fuel in the residential / pce users rate.
Like or not we all contribute to the area's economy with seafood exports, timber industry and mining to name a few. How much more can we take out here? Can you help us be competitive? If we die, we will take a big chunk of the economic structure.
Most of these hydro dams around our area were'nt paid for by residents, but by big government. To say the smaller community is "just too small" and we should move to a more affordable town doesn't do it for me. Its not to say I don't like Juneau, cause a bunch of us have supported such things as keeping the Capitol in Juneau and more. Why are we not in this together?
I watch gavel to gavel with the hope that my Senator and House members will get up and be a pain in the ass for our cause. I live in hope.
I hear a little community near Ketchikan pays the least of us all in Southeast. A town called Hyder. Guess how they get their power? Yes, if my sources are correct, from a Canadian intertie.
me-plus-minus??? Stick it in
me-plus-minus??? Stick it in your ear!
"Lots of people in the state
"Lots of people in the state are suffering high energy costs"
oh really and why is that??
Because oil lobbyists have kept our country from a sensible energy policy, thats why!
hey Mo meet Curly!
Stedder
I wasn't throwing mud at you but thanks for your kind response. Guess we posted about the same time.
I appreciate your predicament because I've gone through a 30 year mortgage plan and payments. And don't think I don't pay taxes, I hurt just as much or more than you do too. I'm not here to tell you to go build a log house.
What I am saying is there is a huge disparity and there never used to be. Thirty some years ago most people paid about the same no matter if you were hydro or diesel; $0.08 to $0.12 was a norm. Today, thats not the case it's $0.09 to $0.61 - a big wide gap here in Southeast. Why people like you don't see that as a problem shows your character. Thank God there are more compassionate people in this world that equalize you out.
You need to get rid of your assumption that living in rural Alaska is a automatic welfare check.
@me-plus-whatever I am one
@me-plus-whatever
I am one of the most compassionate people that I know but I am sick and tired of people that live in rural areas that have the balls to complain about costs of living in rural areas.
There is no work in rural areas. Then you decide well lets cut all the trees down and sell them. Well you know what I dont want you cutting down the trees on public land! So no I do not have once ounce of compassion left for rural people
You need to MOVE and stop living off the rest of us and public land
Wow Stedder
Shall we get off your planet?
Pretty sad commentary from you.
Hey Stredder!
I'll bet Native Americans wished more White Settlers had your sentiment "back in the day" and had stayed on the East Coast. Imagine what it cost the U.S. government to send military troops to fight all the Indians who didn't like all those pesky settlers who showed up like locusts, cutting down trees to build and living on their land.
It's mostly indigeneous people residing in rural areas whose ancestors lived there for thousands of years and they are deeply/emotionally tied to the land. Why the heck should they move to reside in communities with the likes of you?
I really get tired of bloggers who say they're "tired of paying (fill in the blanks)" as if they singlehandedly subsidize whatever they're protesting. Give me a break. I don't have kids in school, I don't drive or own a car, and I don't ski; but I don't rail against increasing the school budget, roads maintenance costs or Eaglecrest. Until you post proof that your annual federal income tax paid is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, I don't want to hear about how you're subsidizing public programs.