“Energy is going to kill us if we don't get a hold of it,” U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski said to a combined state House and Senate floor session Thursday.
Murkowski swung through Juneau on Thursday, with meetings and speeches throughout the day.
In the morning the senator spoke to the Legislature in her annual address. At noon, she discussed economic issues at the Chamber of Commerce lunch.
In both addresses, Murkowski brought up energy often, calling it the “No. 1 issue across the state.”
Energy affects all other issues in the state, she said.
The strength of the U.S. military could be in jeopardy because of high fuel costs, Murkowski said. She said she believes the Air Force decision to move an F-16 fighter squadron from Eielson Air Force Base to Anchorage’s Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson was based on cost cutting and not military strategy.
Federal transportation dollars to Alaska are shrinking and other sectors have been cut, Murkowski said, due to rising fuel prices.
“It's expensive to do business in Alaska.” Murkowski said, “Energy is our Achilles heal.”
However, she said, Southeast Alaska has a wealth of energy resources it can develop. She praised the state’s Renewable Energy Fund and its stimulus for developing the energy resources of the future.
“Let’s get projects going. I want a wave project off Yakutat,” she said.
Developing Southeast’s vast power potential will cost, Murkowski said. But, she said, the state needs the basic infrastructure other states received over the past 150 years.
But to get the demand to develop those projects, Murkowski said Southeast Alaska needs its renewable energy generation made available to utilities and customers down the Pacific Coast — an intertie with British Columbia she called the “green pipeline.” Funding for such a project would be hard to find in the current federal budget, she said. She suggested the possibility of transferring profits from oil and gas development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge into Alaska’s renewables fund.
Murkowski said Alaskans need to educate federal agencies and decision-makers about the unique challenges and opportunities of living and working in the Arctic state. She gave the example of the federal government’s view that hydroelectric power is non-renewable.
Murkowski said most people think of the Hoover Dam when thinking hydro power. Southeast hydroelectric facilities predominantly use lake tap technology, which uses small dams, if any, and typically cause less damage to anadromous streams and rivers. Southeast, she said, also doesn’t have to worry about depleting its water supply.
“Anybody that would suggest that water is not renewable just does not live in Southeast Alaska,” Murkowski said. So it is not eligible for certain tax credits and “some of the policies and proposal that have helped build out a nascent renewable industry in this nation.”
She talked about the “chaos” in Washington, D.C. She said the nation is divided.
“Alaska is different,” Murkowski said. “Whether pioneers or recent arrivals, we are joined together by our choice to live here...together. Alaska is what we make of it.”
She said it was this kind of teamwork that allows “big miracles” like the emergency fuel delivery to Nome this winter.
“Pulling everybody together like that was really a miracle," Murkowski said. "We did a darn good job."
Murkowski said she approves of tackling the federal deficit and debt by cutting federal spending.
“Cutting spending is a national imperative,” Murkowski said, and “Alaska is going to take a hit."
Murkowski urged construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, and segued the troubles of that pipeline to those of Alaska’s pipeline, which she called underutilized.
Murkowski said the nation needs to fully appreciate the need to explore for more oil in Alaska to take full advantage of the state’s current pipeline, which currently moves a fraction of the oil it did in its most productive stages.
"It is an urgent need," Murkowski said.
The senator spoke specifically about exploration and development of expected oil fields in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, or ANWR.
This year, for 12th time, Rep. Don Young has pushed an ANWR bill in Congress. Murkowski said she was pessimistic that the bill would pass the Senate this year. She said opening the refuge will take a supportive administration in Washington or the occurrence of some calamity that shows “we should have opened ANWR years ago,” she said. “I will not give up until it succeeds, it must happen. It is simply too important to this state and too important to this nation.”
The transfer of air quality from the purview of the Environmental Protection Agency to the U.S. Interior Department could help promote offshore exploration and development. Interior, she said, has a mandate to move offshore oil and gas projects. However, litigation is still to be expected, she said.
“We are not leading in the Arctic,” Murkowski warned. “Back in Washington, D.C. no one understands that.” Alaska needs ice breakers and military leaders are in agreement they are an imperative to the country, she said.
"There is such an interest that is at stake, we have to broaden the advocacy," Murkowski said.
President Barack Obama allocated $8 million in his current budget for icebreaker design, Murkowski said. "Eight million dollars doesn't get you the...porthole," she said. “It’s almost an embarrassment that we are an Arctic state and we don't have an Arctic-class icebreaker.” Russia, she points out, has 33 ice breakers.
Murkowski said Alaska’s Legislature shows solidarity that is noticed in Washington, D.C.
"I see it from afar," Murkowski said. Whether resource development, supporting U.S. soldiers, or fighting federal overreach, that solidarity, Murkowski said, makes her work more effective.
Whether Alaskans want to change the federal status of hydroelectric power or convince the feds to fund ice-breakers or to protect the state’s military bases, Murkowski said all Alaskans need to educate federal agencies and decision-makers, who may not grasp the scale and complexities of Alaska.
“We are at our best when we coordinate efforts," Murkowski said.
Murkowski responded emotionally to a question by state Sen. Lesil McGuire about the controversy surrounding the trial of former U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens.
"It was a travesty," Murkowski said. “This case demonstrates how clearly we need changes. We are going to try to right the wrong," she said.
On the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, Murkowski said she wants it reversed.
"It takes away the concept of one person, one vote. The result of this decision takes us so far back, we have to address it,” Murkowski said. She did admit to being the benefactor of a Super PAC in 2010. Super PACs have expanded their role in the financing the 2012 campaigns, in large part due to the Citizens United decision that allowed unlimited contributions to the political advocacy organizations.
“I stood to gain from that,” she said. “However, it is only appropriate that Alaskans and Americans know where the money comes from.”
Murkowski said she often asks Alaska business owners what Washington, D.C. can do to help their industry. The answer often is “get out of the way,” she said to applause from the Chamber members. “We are fully capable.”
One difficulty faced by entrepreneurs in Alaska is the state’s relative paucity of private lands. Currently 98 percent of the state is comprised of federal land, Murkowski said. She said she showed Obama a map of Alaska with all the federally-owned land overlaid.
“‘Well, how do you make it work,’” Murkowski said Obama asked. “Bingo,” she said to the Chamber.
• Contact reporter Russell Stigall at 523-2276 or at russell.stigall@juneauempire.com.

Comments (14)
Add commentLots of standard talking points
Open ANWR, more ice breakers, more oil for the pipeline...
But I have to give Lisa HUGE KUDOS for her statement on Citizens United!!
That was a bold statement from a republican. I hope it indicates a sea change from within her party. Now I want to see her back that up with action.
“‘Well, how do you make it
“‘Well, how do you make it work,’” Murkowski said Obama asked. “Bingo,” she said to the Chamber.
What are we going to challenge Obama to a bingo match at the ANB Hall to determine the future of Alaska's resources.
Murky has the GOP talking points down pretty great and always has a little red meat for the lefties. Time for this waste of a senate seat to go out to pasture.
The cost of fuel will not go
The cost of fuel will not go down with more drilling, the price for oil is controlled by the "world markets" and the US has very little to do with it.
More drilling is not a solution
Lisa has turned her back on
Lisa has turned her back on the Alaskan way of life and is doing the bidding for the industries that want to eat our state for breakfast. Go back to DC lisa and stay there.
Stop selling our state out! How disappointing, opening ANWR??..come on lets not go there.
Her comments.
“Energy is going to kill us if we don't get a hold of it,” U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski said.
“It's expensive to do business in Alaska.” Murkowski said, “Energy is our Achilles heal.”
"Developing Southeast’s vast power potential will cost", Murkowski said. "But", she said, "the state needs the basic infrastructure other states received over the past 150 years".
“Let’s get projects going” she said.
CO2 is Alaskas Achilles heal
"Energy is our Achilles heal" this is true but its because lobbyists have been allowed to write energy policy in Congress and we will not get good policy from lobbyists. Lobbyists are only concerned about profits and not about the public. Oil lobbyists in congress have kept our country tied to using oil
I think Alaskas Achilles heal is the "Global Carbon Cycle". Alaska is an Arctic state and CO2 is hurting our state more than it does in other states.
Alaska is already having big problems with CO2 like Ocean Acidification. And the idea to open up more public land to the "polluting" industries will make pollution an even bigger problem for Alaska. We also have the GOP in Congress doing everything they can to weaken and de-fund EPA. And on top of this, our Oil lobbysit Governor is doing what he can to weaken Alaska state environmental protection laws. And working to weaken environmental protection laws is all for the benefit of polluting industries because more pollution certainly does not benefit the Public.
Opening up Public land in Alaska to industry is really more about wealth creation for the extraction industries than anything.
And I do not like the idea of implying to Pres. Obama that Alaskans want Federal Land in our state to be opened up to the extraction industries - it just not true.
So, my big question is, Lisa what are you planning to do to protect our way of life here from pollution? Globalization, greed and resulting pollutions are jeopardizing our state and the health of Alaskans.
What IS best for the public, bloggers?
Please get to the point. What do YOU think IS best for the public...tell me please? You are vague in that regard here. And, what about refineries? U.S. refineries are old, outdated, and ignored by the feds?...hmmm do you think this might be an oversite?....NOT
Palin for Senate would be a
Palin for Senate would be a good start. Sarah would be the most powerful freshman senator in history the day she walked in the door and would be an ideal replacement for Murky on the energy committee.
She knows the industry players, how to get stuff done even if it [filtered word] off people in her own party, and we already know she won't just drop trou and grab her ankles for the oil companies.
Whats best for the public?
Whats best for the public? How about some truthful information rather than agendas bought by the wealthiest of Americans. If the financial crisis put any development on trial, it was the free market, which emphasizes a small state, deregulation, private ownership and low taxes.
This - Let It Rip in Alaska - agenda is sure worrisome, highlighted by the fact that Governor Sean Parnell just changed the mission statement for the Dept. of Natural Resources.
Managing Alaskas resources for the needs of future generations - was removed.
Energy is No. 1 State issue
"Southeast Alaska has a wealth of energy resources it can develop"
"Anybody that would suggest that water is not renewable just does not live in Southeast Alaska,”
So why is AEA SEIRP against hydropower and interties?
How is Nome like the moon?
How much did someone pay to haul more than a million gallons of diesel to Nome this winter? Scares me to think about it. However if you Google 'Thorium Power' you will find a new type of power plant that could power Nome and other remote towns. The thorium power plant was designed for a remote outpost on the moon. I Don't know how much it would cost, but the money we paid to burn diesel in Nome this winter would have put a dent in it. Alaska has a lot of remote places that need energy, and they will not get it with yesterday's grid type technology. They will not get it with wood pellets, either. Alaska is a logical place for a new energy system, but we will have to look forward and plan carefully. Investing hundreds of millions on grid systems will prevent Alaska from being able to afford new energy systems in the near future.
South East Alaska would be one of the best places in the world to build up a mini-hydro energy based system. Such systems could be reinforced with small wind and solar energy, and possibly small tidal and wave projects. It would cost money and take political will, but once in place it could work. What it will require is careful planning, a number of small interlocking modern technologies, and a lack of 'special interests' that will want mega-projects to take control of the money involved.
Pipe dream
Dream on Spoor, who will administer these new "green" projects? Obama and his Illinois cronies? Our country has suffered nothing but a woeful trail of tears when it comes to green energy. Not to say it isn't viable, but it's just as corrupt as oil, probably worse. The Nome fuel delivery didn't cost much, it was done by the Russians with Korean oil which became very cost effective. A thing or two can be learned here, then we can start with natural gas.
what is best for us?
How about they quit talking and talking about the problem and start building or doing?
Interties, geothermal, tidal turbines. We are energy rich. Why can't we look at our global equals and follow through. Didn't they go to Norway for a reason? Everyone does it better than Alaska when it comes to "doing it".
Oil refinery. Yes, one in Haines Alaska.
It makes no sense to ship our crude down south and them ship it back with a huge price tag......didn't they say to patronize "made in Alaska"? Well, how about heating oil and gasoline refined in Haines?
Southeast Alaska isn't economic absent economies of scale
Senator Murkowski nailed it, so why can't the Alaska Energy Authority official in charge of the SEIRP understand it? Can't think of a reason (that can be discussed on this site) because if one dares an educated guess it won't be published.
As for Spoor's assertions on mini-hydro based systems. If they are as great as is presented, then why aren't they in place? Hint, they aren't economically feasible unless there is an economy of scale. No such offering for mini-hydro, nor for anything that fits Kake or Hoonah at this point.
This is why Senator Murkowski, ranking member of the Senate Energy Committee thinks an interconnection to Canada would be a huge start for this region's energy potential.
Such a link would bring the necessary economies of scale, which is basic economics. However, monopolies and oligopolies are also described in economics and they are fairly influential locally as well.
Good for the Senator for taking a stand in favor of doing something for our local economy instead of the status quo.