Gov. Sean Parnell and rivals in the Legislature continued to feud Tuesday over comments made by Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka, to the Juneau Chamber of Commerce — and the governor’s outraged reaction to them.
Parnell this week released to the press a letter to Stedman taking issue with his comments to the chamber, even comments that didn’t appear to be directed at the governor.
Tuesday, Rep. Berta Gardner called the Parnell’s letter “snarky,” but the governor repeated some of its claims in a press conference.
He also defended the public letter to Stedman.
“It was a proportional response to what he said,” Parnell said.
After Stedman’s address in to the chamber, he had to go public.
“I cannot allow only one side of the story to be published,” he said.
After House passage of Parnell’s oil tax cut bill, the Senate stopped working on that bill last year and began work on its more modest tax reduction, Senate Bill 192, this year.
Parnell’s letter likened the Senate’s touting of that bill to “a group of hens in the barnyard clucking together over a new egg that has taken more than a year to lay, the egg is shiny on the outside, and empty on the inside.”
After an Anchorage reporter asked Parnell if he was trying to shed his “Captain Zero” image with the letter to Stedman, Parnell responded that unlike the reporter’s question, his letter was not a personal attack.
Stedman said he’d had a cordial phone discussion Friday when Parnell called him to tell him the letter was coming.
He described the letter as “entertaining.”
Senate President Gary Stevens even continued with Parnell’s egg simile, noting “it’s not even Easter yet” and saying SB192 would be ready some time in April.
“It’s going to be a beautiful egg,” he said.
Parnell said that concerns he raised about the trans-Alaska pipeline system closing due to low flows shouldn’t be part of the letter.
Stedman’s chamber speech called the threats that TAPS would close without Parnell’s tax reductions “scare tactics.” Those claims were made in the House of Representatives last year, but brought up again by Parnell in his State of the State this year.
Parnell Tuesday denied he had been raising the issue.
“Sen. Stedman brought it up,” he said.
Parnell said that just because TAPS won’t close that doesn’t mean the current tax system is working, and continued to push for tax cuts significant enough to bring the state back to production of a million barrels a day.
Note: The statement from Gary Stevens was incorrectly attributed in an earlier version of this story.
• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.




Comments (15)
Add commentStedman is going to make a wonderful omelette
Was Parnell at the Chamber speech?
If he had been, he would not have gone off half-cocked and thrown yet another tantrum.
Just like he has done with the scholarship program, Parnell has proven himself incapable of attempting to resolve differences between him and legislators and others who hold other opinions. In the case of Senator Stedman, his approach seems to be based upon the facts and information carefully gathered from oil taxation experts hired by the Legislature.
Working with a co-equal branch of government established by the Constitution is hard work. It's called governing.
ps Parnell said: “I cannot allow only one side of the story to be published.” What he means is that only his side- including the omnipresent oil company ads- is allowed to be presented throughout the Kingdom of Alaska.
Issue hip waders
The big 3 are in Juneau today to spread their gloom and doom to legislators. "Senators, hook up the honey wagon, were going to need it"
Chicken Little more appropriate
What came first, the Chicken or the oil taxes? Governor Parnell likens the Senate to hens, but the correct image is Parnell as Chicken Little. He proclaims the pipeline is going dry, revenue is drying up, and that bullies must be paid off to be friends of Alaska. His quaint views are merely acorns bouncing off umbrellas - of no consequence.
Parnell is learning...
...who really has the power. And it ain't him.
You need to let our
You need to let our legislators know that you are against Parnells tax cuts for the oil industry.
Chicken Little
Chip Thomas above beat me to it. The sky is not falling as our Governor claims. Chicken Little said the same thing.
Keep nesting that egg, Senator Stedman! Your constituents trust you better with the egg than our Governor. You actually want to hatch the egg, whereas our Governor wants to give the egg away to chicken farmers who already have billions of eggs and don't need any more.
Hell, he'd probably drop the egg along the way, break it, then ask for another, bigger egg next session.
Cokc a doodle don't.
(misspelling intended to mislead the dirty word filter)
"After an Anchorage reporter
"After an Anchorage reporter asked Parnell if he was trying to shed his “Captain Zero” image"...
Now that's some serious journalism, right there.
A poll commissioned by House Majority shows support for Senate
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/poll-alaskans-favor-no-drama-gov-p...
The Senate's cautious approach to reducing oil-production taxes edged past the governor's plan to cut taxes immediately and by a vastly larger amount, according to a poll commissioned by the House Majority Caucus that plumbed the public's views on a number of complicated issues before the Legislature.
....The pollster's question noted that the Senate insists on "guarantees" that oil companies will invest if taxes are lowered. The idea of a guarantee appeals to people and may have drawn more support for the Senate's position, though the oil companies -- such as BP, ConocoPhillips and Exxon Mobil Corp. -- have guaranteed NOTHING, (Dittman President Larkin said.
Impressed
I am thoroughly impressed that Parnell managed to get elected.
Agreed!!
Who put that lunatic into office? Come on, Alaska!!
It appears he has been riding
It appears he has been riding the coat tails of our best governor in recent memory.....
@ JuneauMuttLover
To answer your question, republicans voted him into office.
And you should all be very proud (sarcasm intended).
No...
Complacent and uninformed voters did.
If we could ever get more
If we could ever get more than 15 people to show up and vote we might have different results...