The House of Representatives on Tuesday voted to make it a crime to text while driving.
The new law is intended to save lives, but came despite some concerns about additional government intrusion in people’s lives, even among its supporters.
Supporters said the bill is needed because drivers distracted by texting are putting others at risk.
“When you are texting and driving you take your eye off the road for 4.5 to 6 seconds, which is the length (of time it takes to cover the distance) of a football field,” said Rep. Bill Thomas, R-Haines, one of the prime sponsors of House Bill 255.
Recent accidents in Anchorage have shown how dangerous that can be, he said.
The Legislature had already banned texting while driving, or so it thought. A Kenai judge ruled the intent of that law was not clear.
House Bill 255 overturns that judge’s decision, declaring it “legally incorrect.”
The bill passed the House 34-5, with all Southeast representatives in favor. Reps. Beth Kerttula, D-Juneau, and Peggy Wilson, R-Wrangell, joined as sponsors, and Reps. Cathy Muñoz, R-Juneau, and Kyle Johansen, R-Ketchikan, supported it as well. Muñoz had earlier introduced a bill to ban cell phone use while driving to save even more lives, but that was voted down in committee.
Rep. Les Gara, D-Anchorage, who joined Thomas as a prime sponsor, said that a National Conference of State Legislatures study showed somebody who was texting while driving was 20 times as likely to cause an accident or a near accident than someone who wasn’t.
It was even worse than being drunk, he said.
“While texting or reading a text, you are slower in reacting to people who you may kill than even when you’re drunk,” Gara said.
Alaskans don’t need more distractions, Thomas said.
“Just living in Alaska, to look off the side of the road to a bear or moose is distracting enough,” he said.
Thomas acknowledged making texting while driving a crime was a harsh punishment, but said it would get the public’s attention and was better than the alternative.
It is better to have a misdemeanor for violating the law than have a felony for killing someone, Thomas said.
Rep. Scott Kawasaki, D-Fairbanks, said that took the law a step too far.
“This is not about whether this is a safe activity to do, this is about making it a criminal action for folks who do chose to text,” he said.
That’s too limiting for citizens, he said.
“Government has done a lot to restrict regular citizens from doing regular things,” he said.
Rep. Tammie Wilson, R-North Pole, questioned whether the law was needed. She voted against the bill.
“I think everybody here knows that texting is wrong, and they shouldn’t be doing it,” she said.
Despite the lopsided vote, even supporters said they had some concerns.
“I’m very concerned when we have to pass laws that encroach on individual freedoms, laws that are essentially legislating common sense,” said Rep. Mike Hawker, R-Anchorage.
Rep. Charisse Millett, R-Anchorage, also expressed reservations before voting for the bill. She questioned both its effectiveness and its fairness.
“You can’t legislate common sense, you just can’t,” she said.
And texting is just one way that drivers are distracted.
“I’ve been rear-ended from someone reading the newspaper,” she said.
Both Hawker and Millett said the bill was strongly supported by their constituents.
The bill now goes to the Senate.
• Contact reporter Pat Forgey at 523-2250 or at patrick.forgey@juneauempire.com.





Comments (8)
Add commentI don't get it
Why the opposition to making this law? Say what you want to about Government control run amok. The purpose of a law is to assign penalties to the behavior that encourages people to comply.
We have strict laws against drinking and driving yet to suggest that 'common sense' prevents motorists from engaging in the behavior and that the law isn't necessary sounds ludicrous to me.
I've been riding the bus recently so I've had plenty of time to observe drivers as they whizz by the bus stop in the morning. I am shocked at the number of drivers texting (I can see those thumbs in motion) or looking at their celly's as they drive.
And just so we are not sidetracked by all the other distractions...it's about 10 drivers handling Celly's to one driver seen putting on make up or having something to eat...so please don't go there. You can't convince me that other distractions are as dangerous or pervasive.
Texting while driving is a very dangerous situation that is much worse IMHO than drinking and driving, yet few would dispute DUI is horribly dangerous for all other drivers on the road. I don't want to be injured or killed by someone in total denial about this problem.
I’ve seen the aftermath of a couple bad wrecks recently here in Juneau...and it is my opinion that texting or surfing the net on a cell was the cause. I can see the vehicles failed to respond to a gentle bend in the road...and as Mr. Thomas points out...they were about the length of that football field before hitting their tragic end. The police reports noted that alcohol was not a factor in these accidents but said little more. I’m surprised we aren’t talking more about this subject and giving it the priority it deserves.
Mama T I truly understand and agree on Texing and Cell
We have seen bad behaviors regardless of DRIVER'S AGE who are texting or being on the cell phones while driving.
You cannot mulit-task while driving. Common sense!
Comments
Seems to be a small amount of comments on such a big issue, is it because so many people are guilty of it? The awarness about this is very high, but not many people want to admit to it or simply dont care until it effects them personally.
But you know what? When it effects you personally, it's to late.
Put your phone down and drive before you kill/hurt someone or yourself please.
Unnecessary
We already have laws against distracted driving, which should be enforced regardless of the distraction. Texting should just be included as a distraction under those laws. When the legislature gets overly specific, as in this case, it just makes the law more complex and harder to enforce. The fact that last year's law against texting was declared unenforceable is an excellent example.
Unnecessary
We already have laws against distracted driving, which should be enforced regardless of the distraction. Texting should just be included as a distraction under those laws. When the legislature gets overly specific, as in this case, it just makes the law more complex and harder to enforce. The fact that last year's law against texting was declared unenforceable is an excellent example.
Wasn't last year's law
unenforceable because it was too vague? There is a time stamp on your text. The officer knows what time it is when he pulls you over. Case closed, the proof is on your phone.
I agree with Mama T - this isn't any more an 'invasion' than legal drinking age, driving age, speed limit, or any of a thousand other things that are regulated.
Hang up, put both hands on the wheel, and pay attention to what you are doing for the whole 5-15 minutes it will take you to get from anywhere to anywhere in town.
Waste of time
@swimmergirl: And what gives the officer the right to look through my phone? (Kudos to the officer if they get my passcode)
I have to agree with Rep. Charisse Millett "You can’t legislate common sense, you just can't."
I also have to agree with awilkins' assertion that it should have been added to existing distracted driving laws.
I agree with the first three
I agree with the first three comments - and swimmergirl. An idiot who was texting while driving took the life of my closest friend's daughter and her unborn grandchild. The heartache caused by this selfish idiot will never leave the lives of the many people who loved her. I am in favor of laws against texting and talking on your cell while you are driving. I have been rear-ended twice at stop lights by idiots talking on cells.
Luckily for me, the only damage was to my vehicle, and that was easy to fix. The damage done when those two precious lives were taken can never be fixed. Think it can't or won't happen to you? It can.