• Few clouds
  • 36°
    Few clouds
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

State ferry strikes Ocean Beauty's Petersburg dock

Posted: May 8, 2012 - 12:06am
The Ocean Beauty Seafoods dock in Petersburg, Alaska show heavy damage on Monday, May 7, 2012 after the Alaska Marine Highway vessel Matanuska hit the dock while negotiating a turn in Wrangell Narrows prior to docking at the ferry terminal. (AP Photo/Petersburg Pilot, Suzanne Ashe)  Suzanne Ashe
Suzanne Ashe
The Ocean Beauty Seafoods dock in Petersburg, Alaska show heavy damage on Monday, May 7, 2012 after the Alaska Marine Highway vessel Matanuska hit the dock while negotiating a turn in Wrangell Narrows prior to docking at the ferry terminal. (AP Photo/Petersburg Pilot, Suzanne Ashe)

ANCHORAGE — One of Alaska’s largest state ferries hit a seafood processing plant’s dock head-on Monday, causing significant damage, officials said.

The 408-foot Matanuska ferry hit the dock belonging to Ocean Beauty, said Jeremy Woodrow, a spokesman for the Alaska Department of Transportation.

The Petersburg Pilot reported the face of the Ocean Beauty concrete dock was heavily damaged, dock pilings were broken and a crane was damaged. Even the second floor of the idled processing plant was damaged, with walls and outer walkways partially demolished. The Matanuska shows possible dents and scrapes to the bow of the ship.

“It wasn’t a glancing blow. It pretty much was a head-on hit,” Glorianne Wollen, the harbormaster in Petersburg, told The Pilot.

“It’s one of those things. I don’t know how or why the Matanuska T-boned the dock,” plant manager Cheryl Romeo told The Associated Press from Ocean Beauty’s headquarters in Seattle.

The Matanuska missed Ocean Beauty’s ammonia plant, but she said the company is trying to get a skiff in the water to deal with a hydraulic leak on a crane, which was left hanging over the dock after the collision.

There were no immediate reports of injuries, both Woodrow and Romeo said. There were 60 passengers on board at the time of the accident.

Romeo planned to be in Petersburg on Tuesday. Mike Forbush, the southeast regional manager for Ocean Beauty, also will soon be on-site with insurance adjustors.

“We’re assessing the damage, and we’re contacting contractors right now,” he said. “It’s not going to hinder us from operating this summer.”

There was no damage estimate, but Forbush said “it’s definitely in the hundreds of thousands of dollars” to fix.

Romeo said the plant is idled with few employees before the processing season. The plant employed 240 people last year.

The accident happened as the Matanuska was maneuvering a 180-degree turn in a narrow passage as the crew was trying to dock in Petersburg, Woodrow said. There were unanticipated currents of 3-4 knots.

The Coast Guard inspected the Matanuska, and cleared it to continue its sailing to Wrangell, Ketchikan and Prince Rupert, British Columbia. It was running about two hours behind schedule, but Woodrow said they would try to make up time on the water.

The captain of the vessel, who hasn’t been named, continued the voyage, Woodrow said.

An internal investigation of the accident was immediately opened. The marine highway system “is withholding releasing any names while the incident is under investigation,” he said.

“We need to interview all the parties involved, review the ship as well, make sure that there’s a thorough investigation before there’s any fingers pointed, and whether the cause of the problem is human or mechanical,” he said.

The accident occurred about 1:30 p.m., 90 minutes before high tide, as the ferry was making its scheduled run from Juneau to Petersburg, 125 miles to the southeast.

According to the Alaska Marine Highway System’s web page, the Matanuska has been in service since 1963. Five years later, it was renovated and lengthened.

It can carry 500 passengers, has 108 berths and can hold 88 vehicles.

  • Comment

Comments (18)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Mama T
2396
Points
Mama T 05/08/12 - 03:54 am
4
4

OOOOOppps!

Drug Test!

Latitude58
14419
Points
Latitude58 05/08/12 - 06:28 am
6
1

Squirrely place, that Wrangell Narrows

Glad I'm not piloting a 400 ft ship through there.

snagger
8268
Points
snagger 05/08/12 - 06:36 am
1
0

Bull in a china shop.......

Good thing they didn't t-bone a rock in Wrangell Narrows!

Jo MacNamara
697
Points
Jo MacNamara 05/08/12 - 07:29 am
2
1

CRASH!

I've had days like that...

yes but
139
Points
yes but 05/08/12 - 08:17 am
0
3

could it be???

Maybe he was on the cell or texing ????

Audio27
236
Points
Audio27 05/08/12 - 08:22 am
6
1

It's a tough spot

Several friends I know who work the ferry say what a difficult passage the Narrows are, and its the sudden change in currents that are biggest problem.

It seems this type of unstoppable drift is not a matter of if they collide with something, but when. State insurance rates on the ferries just went up.

swimmergirl
4368
Points
swimmergirl 05/08/12 - 08:55 am
4
1

Lat, Joe, and Audio

are right. I remember being astounded going through there many times in my 20's at the power of the water. I wouldn't want to be piloting a 400 ft vessel in a tiny space in there either. Glad no one was hurt - stuff can always be fixed.

islander
1193
Points
islander 05/08/12 - 09:23 am
3
2

not new passage

the ferry has been making the run through that area for a long time. To begin believing the currents or other conditions were different today than on many other voyages is hard to believe. There is more than one person on the bridge at any given time. Before the issue is ended there will be a full investigation by the USCG. That investigation will not allow any simplistic determination like some posters are making on how this happened.

BuNNy
181
Points
BuNNy 05/08/12 - 09:35 am
0
0

Been There Many Times

Glad no one was hurt! I agree, it was a matter of time in just the wrong water conditions. Fate was not on her side today...

kmkmci
711
Points
kmkmci 05/08/12 - 09:38 am
4
0

Surprised they let the ferry proceed south without completing

full investigation of ship and ship's personnel.

High/low tides and extreme currents are generally predictable, aren't they?

It's important to be able to trust the AMH and it's pilots. Where an honest mistake in challenging conditions can be forgivable, lack of information does not build trust.

Folks should not feel they are at risk from "unanticipated currents" when boarding ferries.

Audio27
236
Points
Audio27 05/08/12 - 02:41 pm
1
0

@Islander

I wasn't making a simplistic determination. I was sharing what actual AMHS crew members have told me about the navigation of the Narrow passages. In no way did I infer that I KNEW the root cause, just that navigating there has ALWAYS been difficult. Who said the conditions were different yesterday then any other day? Guess what - it is ok to share what those in the know have said about navigating a certain area.

AH HA
1640
Points
AH HA 05/08/12 - 03:51 pm
2
1

What Gives?

The high tide just after the incident was 16.8 and there are many tides more than 18 feet in Petersburg. Tides like this are common and the current is nearly always running in the area. These conditions should not have presented an "Unknown" to the captain who is almost certainly also a marine pilot licensed for the area. Ferries have been successfully docking in Petersburg in these conditions for about fifty years without mishap.

isawa
0
Points
isawa 05/08/12 - 06:05 pm
0
0

Maybe, the tide was not the problem.

Bummer! I have not confirmed this, but I was informed that there was a fishing boat involved. Matanuska were trying to avoid the fishing vessel, not docking.

apirateiam
3
Points
apirateiam 05/09/12 - 02:01 am
2
0

The Truth

The truth is I was on that ferry when it occurred a fishing vessel came within 20 feet off the bow of the ship he made an evasive move to keep from killing the fisherman so I have to commend whom ever was at the wheel and the mate that was on the bridge. These days the captain is rarely even on the bridge anymore, We can thank the coast Guard for that. He is in his office doing paperwork for them. I guess Ship safety is not as important as paperwork. Maybe if the captain was allowed on the bridge this might not have happened. Maybe we need two captains on a ship now days one to do the paperwork and one to be on the bridge. I am sure that captains is saying right now it was better to break a little wood than to kill a man. If he had hit the small fishing vessel he would have surely sunk. Maybe the drug test that we need to ask for was the stupid fisherman.

AH HA
1640
Points
AH HA 05/09/12 - 08:13 am
1
0

So, You were Acually on the ferry?

And you acually saw this fishing boat that was nearly hit? When did the ferry start the evasive manuver? What was the manuver? What did it consist of?

Can you describe the fishing boat? Name it?

Explain how the accident transpired? you know, who was where and going what direction....

Care to give an interview to a reporter?

apirateiam
3
Points
apirateiam 05/10/12 - 05:17 pm
0
0

on the Ferry? yes

Yes I was actually on the Ferry! Everyone wishes to place blame somewhere. I would rather give my comments only to the Coast Guard and their investigation. If you are a reporter I am sure you can receive the full report from them once it is complete. but yes the contributing factor was the F/V

acruxksa
2
Points
acruxksa 05/13/12 - 07:26 pm
0
0

Let's wait and see

5Kts. of current on a 400+ ft. ship isn't like 5kts on a 48ft. seiner. I've read comments about passengers saying "it's like they didn't even try to slow down"............Please, the engines on this ship are almost 50yrs old and the ship displaces 5500 tons , It's not like hopping into your subaru and putting it in reverse.

The Captain of this ship IS one of the BEST! and the reason the USCG let them sail so quickly is because damage to the ship was minimal and the crew did what they were supposed to do.

The news is remiss in leaving out a very critical part of this story that was alluded to in previous comments. Unfortunately, when they finally do get around to adding it, the story won't be nearly as dramatic as the original so you will find the story about how at least one person is lucky to be alive today because the captain of the Matanuska hit a dock while maneuvering to avoid a boat!

Let the damage the M/V Matanuska did to the Ocean Beauty Dock bear witness to just how hard this job is! It's nothing like a 24' bayliner, she's thousands of tons and hundreds of feet, not tens of tons or feet!

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376863/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/
Fire Academy Graduation

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING