ANCHORAGE — Interior Secretary Ken Salazar unveiled a proposed management plan Monday for a vast petroleum reserve on Alaska’s North Slope and the state’s senior senator immediately pronounced it too restrictive.
Republican Lisa Murkowski said the Obama administration picked the most restrictive management plan possible for the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, an area created by President Warren Harding in 1923 that covers 23 million acres, roughly the size of Indiana.
The environmentally sensitive Teshekpuk Lake area, renowned for its habitat for migratory birds, including black brant, Canada geese and greater white-fronted geese, already was under a 10-year deferral for additional study, she said.
“This alternative goes vastly beyond that, putting half of the petroleum reserve off limits,” Murkowski said. “This decision denies U.S. taxpayers both revenue and jobs at a time when our nation faces record debt and chronic unemployment.”
At a press conference, Salazar said the proposal balances wildlife protection, villagers’ subsistence requirements and the nation’s need for additional petroleum.
About 11.8 million acres would be available for leasing, including most land projected to contain oil reserves, Salazar said.
The proposal provides a potential route for a pipeline that could transport oil from offshore leases in the Chukchi Sea east to the trans-Alaska pipeline, which bisects the state north to south.
The potential for development was balanced with protections for the region’s wildlife, Salazar said.
“It is an iconic place on our Earth,” Salazar said.
The wildlife includes the 325,000 animals in the Western Arctic Caribou Herd and the 55,000 animals in the Teshekpuk Caribou Herd, sources of subsistence food for 40 northern and western Alaska Native villages.
The Utukok River Uplands special area would protect calving grounds and an area where caribou seek relief from insects.
The plan would restrict leases in Peard Bay and Kasegaluk Lagoon, which is important habitat for seals, polar bears and other marine mammals, Salazar said. Land along the Colville River would be restricted to protect raptors.
Salazar said a final decision on the management plan could be made by December.
Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, said the new preferred alternative appears to close off options for building a pipeline across the reserve.
Erik Milito of the American Petroleum Institute said the announcement leaves domestic energy resources, jobs and government revenue off the table.
“The public and the oil and natural gas industry continue to support U.S. energy development,” he said. “However, the Administration continues to prevent, delay and obstruct development of these important resources, and puts off jobs for another day.”
Representatives of environmental groups were encouraged by the choice.
“The areas most important to wildlife must be kept off-limits to development,” said Athan Manuel of the Sierra Club.
National Audubon Society President and CEO David Yarnold said the plan shows that Americans can protect nature on lands designated for energy production.
“Some places really are too precious to drill, and there’s no better example than the Teshekpuk Lake area, one of the planet’s most prolific bird nurseries,” he said.





Comments (16)
Add commentNo better than Babbitt.
You would think in an election year Obama would create some jobs and free up some energy to improve the economy. Or he could go out with the legacy of driving the nation into the dirt. Clintonesque "Lock it up" policies are killing the economy.
Glass half full...
...or half empty?
The oil companies, and their little puppet Murkowski, demand every square foot. The likes of the Sierra Club and Audubon Society demand zero development. It's government's job to split the baby.
Anyone expect better
Anyone expect better from the Obama administration? NPR-A is apparently being reserved for environmental weenies, rather than resource development as originally proposed and planned. This is of little surprise from the least abled administration in history. They're starting to make the Grant administration look like choir boys. Pathetic liberal morons.
"This decision denies U.S.
"This decision denies U.S. taxpayers both revenue and jobs at a time when our nation faces record debt and chronic unemployment.”
Lisa, 2 wars without raising taxes to cover the costs and shipping jobs over seas caused the debt and unemployment, lets see you address the real cause of our nations problems.
But Lisa Murkowski speaks/works for the oil, gas & mining industry. So she spends her time trying to pimp out our Public Lands to enrich the oil, gas and mining industries rather than addressing the real issues. It is absolutely disgusting.
Selling out the public's land to private industry is not the way to fix our nations problems. Address taxes and bring the jobs back to the US will.
Our public lands — are managed by the government on behalf of all Americans — are meant for multiple uses, not for making millionaires off of public resources.
The boot licking Republicans
The boot licking Republicans are selling out their own kids and grandchildren for a few more dollars in their campaign coffers, no foreign terrorists are a bigger threat to the USA.
Sniveling little Democrats
And sniveling little sociopath democrats will lie through their teeth to stay in power while brain dead morons such as abnotey an sefisher will lap at the trough of stupidity, believing every word, as they have no capability to think for themselves.
@akjim: do you have anything
@akjim: do you have anything substantive to add? Facts? Figures? A rationale behind your opinion other than crass generalizations?
I sense a lot of anger from your posts. Anger does not often lead to sound opinions.
No anger
No anger, just following two fallaciously idiotic posts with another. I also notice you only call out conservative voices, not liberal morons sharing your own beliefs. Just sayin'...
@akjim: while abnotey's post
@akjim: while abnotey's post wasn't constructive, sefisher's was. All in all, the "liberal morons" tend not only to write more substantive posts on the whole, but they also get called out (and called names) by those such as yourself more often.
If your perspective is the correct one, then putting forth a persuasive argument for it should be sufficient to convince us. But calling people names when they don't agree with you does not prove your point, and in fact undermines it.
Maybe I'm missing something, or someone, here.
Kim Elton, appointed by President Obama in 2009, is still listed as Senior Advisor for Alaska Affairs for Secretary Salazar.
Would have liked to see our Washington DC liaison on stage.
PP why bother? He's just
PP why bother? He's just trying to cause a rise out of people that are obviously far more level headed and capable of commenting on subjects with contributing perspectives. If he does get someone to Tee off it doesn't matter who acted like the child first. Let him swim in his junior high mentality, we all recognize the ignorance and baiting comments.
With that, I'd love it of they could find a middle ground, but as lat stated, both sides want it all so no matter what we all will lose. what ever happened to anwar?
People need to step back and
People need to step back and realize that if it were not for these areas designated as “Public Lands” then these areas would all be privatized and owned by the elite also off limits to the rest of us.
I find it hard to believe there is a rush of Bill Gates
ready and willing to populate 'the last frontier' to the point of crowding the other 700,000 of us out of the picture.
abnotey: here's hoping you are never introduced to the real
terrorist mcoy.
As for campaign coffers, yes, the Republican groups have so far outspent Democrats in independent expenditures nearly 4-1 according to Center for Responsive Politics.
Since the Citizens United ruling the Democrats have had to play the outside-money game to the best of their abilities (but they feel real bad about it) in an effort to regain some of the 63 seats lost in the House in 2010.
The race for super-pac funding is a little lopsided. Republicans have all those corporate polluters and wall-street cronies in their pockets.
Steel mill (we still have a few) labor unions are no match even with a George Soros in the wings.
The Republicans are not "selling out their kids and grandchildren for a few more dollars in their campaign coffers".
We're talking hundreds of millions of dollars.
Better call up some more teachers.
Romney's campaign spending limitations are about to be removed soon.
y'know Ken...
...if the corporate titans you idolize so much started supporting a woman's choice to have an abortion (perhaps they discovered some profit motive in the policy, or started hiring a bunch of women CEO's), you'd be first in line to shut them out of public lands until they changed their position.
Lat: The only persons with the power to shut me out of my
own "public lands" work for the government you idolize.
Obama's war on ( Alaskan)
Obama's war on ( Alaskan) prosperity continues.