ANCHORAGE — U.S. Rep. Don Young easily won his Republican primary Tuesday.
Young, who is seeking his 21st term as Alaska’s sole U.S. House member, was leading with 78 percent of the vote with 33 percent of the vote counted and wasn’t challenged by lesser-known Republicans John R. Cox and Terre Gales.
Young, as usual, spent election night at his home in remote Fort Yukon.
However, he said in statement that he was “both humbled and honored by the overwhelming level of support shown by Alaskans tonight.”
In the Democratic primary, state Rep. Sharon Cissna of Anchorage was winning with 46 percent of the vote. Matt Moore was second with 18 percent and Debra Chesnut, third with 14 percent.
Young has held the office since 1973. Besides having huge name recognition, he also enjoys a huge cash advantage. As of Aug. 8, Young had more than $584,000 cash on hand and has been raising money since.
Dr. Ronald Glaeser, an Anchorage orthodontist, said Young keeps winning easily over the years because he’s effective.
“He’s been there a long time. He knows the ins and outs,” said Glaeser, a Republican supporter of Young, after voting Tuesday. “We need some experience from Alaska to give our viewpoint.”
In his statement, Young said he believes Alaska “needs someone who will stand up and fight for this state — and as long as I have the fire to serve, I believe I am the best person for the job.”
There was more competition on the Democratic side, with the challengers vying to become the first from their party to hold the office since 1973.
The other Democrats in the race were Doug Urquidi and Frank Vondersaar. All struggled to raise funds and get traction for their campaigns.
Cissna was the best known among them, mainly for her fight with the Transportation Security Administration. Last year, the breast cancer survivor refused a pat-down at a Seattle airport and went through a variety of modes of transportation to get back to Alaska. She rails against the agency.
But it’s her legislative experience that prompted a vote from Jane Meacham of Anchorage.
“I think she has experience and is about the only one who can beat Don Young,” Meacham said.
Moore, who owns a medical consulting business in Anchorage, raised the most money among the Democrats — more than $37,000. Chesnut, who runs her husband’s dental practice and has a coffee hut in Fairbanks, had raised less than half that. Cissna hadn’t filed any finance reports but said she has lent money to her campaign.
Bridget Milligan, a Democrat from Juneau, said she hadn’t paid much attention to the U.S. House race. She said she voted for a Democratic woman, and had to think when asked who she voted for. “Chesnut,” she said.
Larry Davis, who said he is not affiliated with any political party but leans Democratic, said he has “kind of” followed the race, but judging from past years, figures he knows how it ultimately will end up. Young is seeking his 21st term this year.
Voting for a Democrat, he said, is merely “expressing an opinion.”
“You just come in and you vote and it’s the same old thing year after year,” he said.
Davis said he voted for Cissna, saying he was somewhat familiar with her record and less familiar with the other Democratic candidates.
Besides the winners of the Democratic and Republican primaries, Libertarian Jim C. McDermott will advance to the November general election.
___
Associated Press writers Becky Bohrer in Juneau and Rachel D’oro in Anchorage contributed to this report.





Comments (15)
Add commentBetter Don than...
...Captain Zero, I guess.
I don't know about that Lat.
I don't know about that Lat. Don doesn't even show up to vote a lot of the time. He uses the F word when speaking to an auditorium full of school children. He is there merely for his own enrichment. The dude just needs to go. Do one should make a career out of being a politician. Don knows the ins and outs for sure. He knows who to bribe and who to be bribed by. He knows who butters his bread, and its not us. I don;t know any of these other people, but I will blindly vote for anyone but Don. Don is the posterchild for term limits.
Best of our state?
Is this the best our state, or at least the republicans, can come up with? It is really sad that his republican party cant find one person in over 600,000 that can even give him a close race.
Need term limits
He is so old and we need new blood in there! He keeps winning just because of his familiar name!
If the cameras in D.C. were turned to House/Senate members
seated rather than just the speaker on the podium 'absenteeism' would be alarming.
Low voter turn out (AGAIN)
Registered Voters 496952 - Cards Cast 106201 21.37%
*Source State of Alaska Division of Elections.
Thank you very much to those voters who went out to cast their votes yesterday! Alaska does mean something to YOU!!!
Nick Begich got killed in a
Nick Begich got killed in a plane crash in 1972. Since then Don has been "our man in D.C." Most of the people in Alaska either weren't born, or didn't live in Alaska when he stepped into the position.
Personally, I can't imagine why he would want to stay in the position so long. He has way more money than he can ever spend. I just don't comprehend the lure of muggy Washington D.C.
we'll never fix
washington until term limits are imposed on congress, just as congress imposed on the presidency after FDR passed
Like the president, any term
Like the president, any term limits have to be created by a Constitutional amendment. Congress doesn't do that, the states do that. I can't imagine in this political environment there would be the necessary 3/4 of the state that would approve. While most states are "red," it would be tough to get all of them, plus a few "blue" ones, to work together.
A final personal note - Alaska gets very little representation. What we have gained for our state has been done purely through seniority. Without that seniority Alaskan issues would forever be on the back burner. There's already been a noticeable difference in the Senate with the loss of Ted and Frank. This one reason I support Don, though not the only one. This is also why I will support getting rid of Begich as soon as possible, so strong conservative seniority can once again begin to be built. Unfortunately it seems we're stuck with Lisa, but at least she's mostly conservative.
sheesh,
" This is also why I will support getting rid of Begich as soon as possible, so strong conservative seniority can once again begin to be built. Unfortunately it seems we're stuck with Lisa, but at least she's mostly conservative."
Strong conservative seniority is not created overnight. You make zero sense. Get rid of the liberals (moderates) so we can once again be a strong conservative state? Look at the administration. Look at the resource development. What more do you want?
It's pathetic how little you understand of the goings on in your own state. Do you actually live in Alaska? I am beginning to doubt it...
Poof, once again your reading
Poof, once again your reading comprehension is less than that of my 8 year old: "... so strong conservative seniority can once again BEGIN to be built." (emphases added) Duh, not overnight, that's my point. And these are Senators, not senators (federal, not state), another Duh. Wow, you're making real strides toward stupidity today.
akjim,
you're correcting my use of caps? Shut up. If you want to direct attention away from you incredibly ignorant post from this morning, fine. Do so, but don't waste your time correcting grammar. It may work for you, but it doesn't fix the problem with your initial post.
My point still stands: You're ignorance doesn't create a conservative seniority here in Alaska. Wish in one hand and [filtered word] in the other... see which one fills up first.
Ted Stevens wasn't an ultra-conservative. He was reasonable and worked with democrats. You want a conservative powerhouse unwilling to compromise. This shows how ignorant you are. How does one expect to become powerful in congress without compromising? Are you really this clueless or just hopeful?
And my reading comprehension is just fine. If yo ubothered to read my posts before changing direction, you'd know this. I'm surprised you keep bringing it up... like you're trying to prove something.
@poof
Wow, even more heights. I'll type this slowly so you can better understand. A careful reading would show you that the caps were emphases, as properly noted. It has nothing to do with your use of caps. I'm beginning to assume you have little, if any, college education, otherwise you would realize that. Just normal citation when a quote is changed to create emphases.
And one more time, again I'll type very slow, I was speaking of our national representatives, not those here in Alaska. Your level of obtuseness is appalling. I'm not sure if it's pure ignorance, blind stupidity, or just simple ideological blindness. Regardless, pratter on, you make everyone else seem like Mensa scholars.