ANCHORAGE — Alaska’s seafood could get a marketing boost as part of a national effort to spread the word about American ocean products.
A coalition of 75 fishing-related organizations and states are supporting new legislation to enhance seafood marketing throughout the nation and abroad.
Sen. Mark Begich announced proposed legislation at a press conference Aug. 24 that would spend $50 million per year to market American seafood. The legislation is still being finalized, and will be introduced when the senate reconvenes in September.
Begich said the initiative, “will bring forward a new way to market an incredible product.”
Begich said the effort will work toward getting seafood from all over the country — from Gulf of Mexico shrimp to New England lobster — onto American and international plates.
Selling seafood will, in turn, “promote industry and create jobs in the U.S. and enhance local economies and be able to ensure sustainable fisheries,” Begich said.
Begich announced the legislation at Copper River Seafoods in Anchorage and was joined by others from the National Seafood Marketing Coalition.
Bruce Schactler of Kodiak, director of the coalition, said he thought a national marketing effort could revitalize the seafood industry.
“There’s great opportunity for us to expand and to bring more volume,” Schactler said.
Schactler said the U.S. seafood industry has needed such an effort for a long time. Only 15 percent of the seafood eaten in America is produced domestically, he said.
Begich said the legislation could increase that amount, and also boost sales of American seafood in foreign markets.
“This is a great American job creator,” Begich said. “You’re harvesting from our own lands, our own waters.”
Legislation creating the national coalition is modeled after the 2010 Travel Promotion Act, Begich said, which took two years to realize.
Funding is still in the works, though Begich said he’s looking for a source, like duties, that would not add to taxpayers’ bills.
The money would be used by five regional seafood marketing boards, established by the legislation, which would include harvesters, processors and others involved in the industry.
The legislation also draws on the record of the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, or ASMI, which is paid for by a combination of state and industry funds.
Schactler said that the success Alaska had at bringing the salmon industry back from the brink when farmed salmon depressed global prices could be replicated in other industries facing challenges.
Outgoing ASMI Executive Director Ray Riutta, who is retiring in December, agreed.
“I think Alaska’s a good example of the fact that marketing does work,” Riutta said.
Riutta said marketing Alaska salmon a decade ago helped increase the value for fishermen four-fold, without increasing the size of the harvest.
Such a success could revitalize coastal America, Begich said.
The national marketing effort represents a unified effort to market an American product, Begich said. It brings together various regional entities, including gulf fisheries, Great Lakes representatives, and others.
“We find it pretty exciting to now be moving ahead, to create national partnerships,” said Arni Thomson, executive director of United Fishermen of Alaska.





Comments (20)
Add commentNot gonna happen
Until the election is over. Murky and Young would vote against it, purely for political reasons.
"Funding is still in the
"Funding is still in the works, though Begich said he’s looking for a source, like duties, that would not add to taxpayers’ bills".
Here are some funding sources Mark:
Tax the oil, gas & mining companies.
These industries are not being taxed enough because we should not be allowing these industries to make millionaires’ off of our public resources.
These industries are responsible for untold amounts of pollution damage to our oceans eco-systems and more often than not the public gets stuck with the clean-up tab. This has to change.
"Selling seafood will, in
"Selling seafood will, in turn, “promote industry and create jobs in the U.S. and enhance local economies and be able to ensure sustainable fisheries,” Begich said"
The way to ensure a sustainable fisheries, is to end ocean pollution
But, but, we were told all
But, but, we were told all that seafood out of the Gulf was rotten and poison...
Anyone notice how Begich is always pandering to one group or another?
Sticks his finger up in the air every morning to see which way HIS political winds are blowing. Can't count on him for any set of convictions, ever...
How's he going to explain to the enviro nuts that we need to ramp up fishing?
"Funding is still in the works, though Begich said he’s looking for a source, like duties, that would not add to taxpayers’ bills." Now that's funny.
Maybe this should be a state's issue - nationally we have much bigger fish to fry!!!
Not a bad idea,
the only problem is lack of fish. How about spending that money on research to determine whats affecting fish stock before increasing demand on the fish we already dont have.
No Newlife
Ignorant comments and blaming one party for the fault of both sides is the problem. Until they can actually work for the people instead of playing politics we ALL lose and are to blame.
Alaska Seafood Marketing gets it right!
"Riutta said marketing Alaska salmon a decade ago helped increase the value for fishermen four-fold, without increasing the size of the harvest."
Proof that some rich commercial fishers can afford to PAY for their own advertising program!!!
No Newlife
Ignorant comments and blaming one party for the fault of both sides is the problem. Until they can actually work for the people instead of playing politics we ALL lose and are to blame.
Let's be real....
I've fished Bristol Bay and the price of salmon has not increased 4 fold. Retiring Admiral Riutta has always been and still is .....................
Print some more dollars...
What a novel idea Senator, borrow $20 million (40% if the $50 million) to market food to Americans. Do you realize that the United States Federal budget is a little out of control? Alaska is currently selling all the seafood it is harvesting, so who cares if we sell it to Americans or the foreigners? Come on Senator, you should be above this wasteful, pork spending. Alaska and America could use some real leadership, not this corporate (btw located in Seattle, WA) pandering.
uh huh
Dear Biologists, @NewLife has figured out the problem causing the low fish stock in Alaska. Its those liberals. There, problem solved.
Excuse me...
Hey Newlife, did you just wake up from sleeping that last four years? Democrats are the party of NO? Are you kidding me? OMG you are serious! Now let's see. The Dems in Congress passed as stimuluas package that Republicant governors lined up to get their fair share, President Obama gave the order to get Bin Laden etc. etc :-) Now who is the party of NO? Wasn't it Mitch McConell who said, "It's our job to make sure Obama doesn't get a second term. You CBCs had better vote NO!"
Excuse me...
Hey Newlife, did you just wake up from sleeping that last four years? Democrats are the party of NO? Are you kidding me? OMG you are serious! Now let's see. The Dems in Congress passed as stimuluas package that Republicant governors lined up to get their fair share, President Obama gave the order to get Bin Laden etc. etc :-) Now who is the party of NO? Wasn't it Mitch McConell who said, "It's our job to make sure Obama doesn't get a second term. You CBCs had better vote NO!"
Don't feed...
...the troll.
It doesn’t matter how we
It doesn’t matter how we manage a fishery if there aren’t enough fish to fill nets.
According to the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration’s data, as of August 23 nearly one-third of the way through the fishing year, not a single major groundfish stock had exceeded 33 percent of its annual quota (though Gulf of Maine winter flounder was at 32.3 percent), and groundfish-sector fishermen had only caught 16 percent of their allocated Gulf of Maine cod. The most likely explanation for this is that fishermen simply aren’t finding the fish.
Management systems didn’t cause these fish to disappear. Overfishing in the 1980s and early 1990s took care of that. And now environmental conditions and global climate change are making it harder for those fish to replenish themselves even as fishermen have dialed back their effort.
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/green/news/2012/08/31/36092/fish-...
Fuel prices?
How are we going to get fishermen out there when diesel to run their boats hits over $8 per gal. at some ports? I suppose we can get Gov't subsidies, or just have other countries fish for us.
That's the American way
That's the American way banditrider..Even if you don't have it, throw money at it.
$ well spent?
I'm not sure that marketing will do anything except raise prices somewhat. The only way to create more jobs would be if more fish were available. Fishery resources are already harvested at 100%.
$ well spent?
I'm not sure that marketing will do anything except raise prices somewhat. The only way to create more jobs would be if more fish were available. Fishery resources are already harvested at 100%.