WASHINGTON — The Senate blocked legislation Wednesday that would have established a $1 billion jobs program putting veterans back to work tending to the country’s federal lands and bolstering local police and fire departments.
Republicans said the spending authorized in the bill violated limits that Congress agreed to last year. Democrats fell two votes shy of the 60-vote majority needed to waive the objection, forcing the legislation back to committee.
Supporters loosely modeled their proposal after the President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Civilian Conservation Corps used during the Great Depression to put people to work planting trees, building parks and constructing dams. They said the latest monthly jobs report, showing a nearly 11 percent unemployment rate for veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, merited action from Congress.
Democratic lawmakers turned to the legislation shortly before they’ll adjourn for the finals weeks of this year’s election campaigns. The bill had little chance of passing the House this Congress, but it still allowed senators to appeal to a key voting bloc.
“(With) a need so great as unemployed veterans, this is not the time to draw a technical line on the budget,” said Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida, the bill’s lead sponsor, who faces a competitive re-election battle.
Republicans said the effort to help veterans was noble, but the bill was flawed nevertheless.
Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma said the federal government already has six job-training programs for veterans and there is no way to know how well they are working. He argued that making progress on the country’s debt was the best way to help veterans in the long-term.
“We ought to do nothing now that makes the problem worse for our kids and grandkids,” Coburn said.
Democratic officials did not have an estimate for how many veterans would be hired as a result of the legislation. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said much would depend upon the number of applicants. She noted that more than 720,000 veterans are unemployed across the nation, including 220,000 veterans who have served since Sept. 11. She said putting veterans back to work was the cost of war.
“Instead of meeting us halfway, we have been met with resistance. Instead of saying yes to the nearly 1 million unemployed veterans, it seems some on the other side have spent the last week and a half seeking any way to say no,” Murray said.
A handful of Republicans joined with Democrats in voting to waive the objection to the bill: Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts, Dean Heller of Nevada, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Maine’s Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe. Brown and Heller are also in tough re-election contests.
Heller said he was proud to support the bill.
“After everything our veterans have done for us, the least we can do is make sure they are afforded every opportunity to thrive here at home,” Heller said.





Comments (6)
Add commentWell done...
...Lisa Murkowski. For not voting in partisan lock-step with the Party of No.
We elected you over Joe Miller to be a voice of independence. Nice to seeing you use that independence on rare occasions. Let's see more of it.
And the best way to get out
And the best way to get out of debt is to stop policing the entire world...
election year posturing
I see this as just another way to make veterans a card in the election year deck of point plays. Here we have the atypical move to make veterans believe party A is concerned while party B is not when it comes to vets. We already have in place a pretty good education benefit for veterans. Perhpas the emphasis should be placed on getting more to use the benefit. Attending some school has much longer term benefits than some menial short term job. How much more would such a job provide over what a vet would get a month while attending school?
I know first hand that I am much better off today after having completed a degree that lead to long term employment than I would have been by getting a few months of work raking leaves. I would not have been able to accomplish this without the GI bill for Vietnam era veterans.
"..the federal government already has six job-training programs
for veterans and there is no way to know how well they are working."
Typical.
How about giving the vet the choice of going to work or sitting in a "job training program"?
What is the problem here? Union cards?
Islander: I also benefitted from the veteran's college program. Difference here is the jobs are not available to graduates. They are raking leaves and serving in diners.
Missed in the AP story is
Missed in the AP story is that this bill is PAID FOR...
We really need term limits so
We really need term limits so these guys will actually do the job they were elected to do instead of spending all this energy focused on getting re-elected...
Thank you Sen. Tom Coburn
Thank you Sen. Tom Coburn !
Sen. Murkowski, once again you let emotion over ride common sense.
We can NOT afford more welfare programs.
The best thing we can do for the vets, is get the government out of the way.
And the best way to do that is for the nation to take a shower, & get rid of it's BO !