ANCHORAGE — The high-profile effort to crush the Senate bipartisan coalition isn’t just about its refusal to lower oil taxes.
Social conservatives are latching on, too -- and in a big way. Some leaders say their issues, including the prospect of sharp limits on abortion, resonate with voters as much if not more than the big engine of Alaska oil production and taxes and may draw them to the polls. The same fiscal conservatives who back Gov. Sean Parnell’s desired oil tax cuts, amounting to $2 billion a year, often also support the conservative social agenda.
Alaska Family Action, the political arm of the like-named advocacy group Alaska Family Council, is raising money with an eye on knocking out four Democrats who are part of the Senate coalition.
A separate group is ready to push a constitutional amendment to allow public money to be redirected to private schooling, if the Senate flips to Republican control. The House already is majority Republican.
State legislatures around the country are becoming increasingly Republican, according to an expert from a bipartisan research organization. And with newly drawn legislative districts, Alaska conservatives see their chance. Democrats and unions are pushing back.
“In our view, we have to fire up the social conservative base if we are going to recapture the Senate and be involved in having more a stronger conservative majority in the House,” Jim Minnery, president of both Alaska family groups, told a couple dozen Alaskans recently at a fund-raiser.
Besides abortion restrictions and school vouchers, his group has a range of other issues: elimination of employment benefits for partners in same-sex relationships, opposition to civil rights protections for people who are gay or lesbian, a requirement for Internet filters to prevent people from looking at pornography at public libraries, and greater leeway for the governor in appointing judges. Some would require voter approval of constitutional amendments.
The small gathering was held Oct. 11 at a Midtown restaurant with Parnell as the chief draw. The vice presidential debate was playing on TV. Most of those who sipped on red wine and sampled plates of finger food were headed later that evening to the annual Alaska Right to Life banquet, where the guest speaker was a Michigan woman who was conceived during a rape.
“This goes beyond just pure politics. It goes to who we are as a people,” Parnell said to the Alaska Family Action group. “If we are willing to stand for life as firmly as we are willing to stand for liberty, that is something we each share in common and we each will do together.”
He urged everyone to “give heartily tonight.”
Four in the hot seat
Minnery’s group is trying to raise $40,000 for mailers, automated phone calls featuring national names such as Mike Huckabee, and other tools to turn the Senate. Four Democratic incumbents are targeted:
• Hollis French, a former prosecutor and the influential chairman of the Judiciary Committee. He is trying to stave off a challenge by Republican Bob Bell, a former Assembly member and owner of an engineering and surveying firm, for this West Anchorage seat, Senate District J.
• Bill Wielechowski, a union attorney, who is being challenged by a former one-term House member, Bob Roses, for an East Anchorage seat, Senate District G. Roses, a Republican and former teacher, was president of the Anchorage Education Association, the teachers union, from 2000-2004. This time, the union is endorsing Wielechowski.
• Joe Paskvan, an attorney who co-chaired the Senate Resources Committee, which balked at Parnell’s oil tax cuts. In this Fairbanks race for Senate District B, he is facing Republican Pete Kelly, a former state representative and senator who went on to work as the University of Alaska’s director of state relations.
• Joe Thomas, a retired union business manager who serves on the Senate Finance Committee, which spent weeks working on tax cut alternatives. This Fairbanks-area race, in Senate District A, features a dramatically redrawn district and Thomas must square off against another sitting senator, conservative Republican John Coghill of North Pole.
Minnery said his group also may put money into a fifth race. Republican Sen. Cathy Giessel, who represents the Anchorage Hillside and whose new district stretches to Nikiski and Seward, is being challenged by an independent, Ron Devon, a retired store owner whose wife, Jeanne, writes the Mudflats political blog. Giessel didn’t join the bipartisan coalition and Devon is getting strong backing from unions as well as some old-time Republicans, including Arliss Sturgulewski.
“Cathy Giessel’s race, as she’ll tell you, has become quite competitive, unexpectedly. So we’ll be looking at that race as well to see what we might be able to do to distinguish her as the solid pro-life, pro-family candidate that she is,” Minnery said.
Alaska Family Action also is amassing a wealth of data on likely supporters, Minnery told the fund-raiser crowd. It’s buying into a database launched by the wealthy and ultra conservative Koch brothers originally called the Themis project. The resource is marketed as i360, a database for the pro-business community.
That’s allowing Minnery to dramatically expand his e-mail list, which has numbered around 10,000 conservatives.
“In one fell swoop, we’re going to have close to 50,000 and much, much more information than we’ve ever had in terms of what are their passions, and what districts they are in and what motivates them.”
Minnery’s group backed four GOP candidates in the primary, including Mike Dunleavy, who unseated Sen. Linda Menard of Wasilla and who backers expect to be far more conservative than she was in Juneau.
His group filed disclosures with the Alaska Public Offices Commission detailing the $10,000 it spent during the primary, but not on who contributed.
Paul Dauphinais, APOC’s executive director, said the agency was researching whether Alaska Family Action had to reveal its contributors.
As of Tuesday afternoon, Alaska Family Action had not filed APOC reports for the general election campaign.
Money for church schools
Democrats are advising unions that this state election isn’t just a referendum on oil taxes.
In a recent briefing to the Anchorage Education Association, French said the agenda of social conservatives would likely include school vouchers.
State dollars spent on a child’s education could go directly to parents to use for private school tuition, private tutors, home schools, on-line schools or other options, according to supporters of vouchers, including former Anchorage Mayor Tom Fink.
The prospect worries the teacher’s union, said president Andy Holleman.
“It would almost certainly mean less money for funding our public school system,” Holleman said. “And we think we need more if we’re going to do things like go after the kids who aren’t graduating right now or the kids who are struggling to read or do other things.”
Fink said if the Legislature grows more conservative, supporters are ready to push a constitutional amendment and accompanying legislation to allow public funding for private schooling, including religious schools. The Alaska Constitution says, “No money shall be paid from public funds for the direct benefit of any religious or other private educational institution.” If a proposed constitutional amendment cleared the Legislature, voters would get their say in 2014, he said.
The measures were introduced in this year’s Legislature but didn’t make it through. Two senators who lost their primaries, Menard and on the Kenai, Tom Wagoner, opposed the vouchers for private schooling, Fink said.
“This year we hope to have the votes before the session begins,” Fink said.
His group isn’t raising money for any races but is letting people on its e-mail list know where the candidates stand, he said. On the other side, teachers are going door-to-door to drop off literature, Holleman said.
Kelly, Coghill, and Bell all support vouchers, and Roses said he would support legislation authorizing a system once voters approved a constitutional amendment, according to the Alaska Family Action voter guide.
Giant GOP gains in 2010
Around the country, Republicans hold more seats in state legislatures than they have since the 1920s, according to a recent report by Tim Storey, an elections analyst with the bipartisan National Conference of State Legislatures.
They claimed a number of new seats in 2010 — a midterm election for President Obama, when it’s common for the opposition to gain ground. Some 24 legislative chambers went from Democratic to Republican control — and none flipped the other way, Storey wrote.
“Republican legislators seized the opportunity to push a more conservative agenda in the states where they had complete legislative control,” the report found. “They also took advantage of their new majorities to draw favorable new district maps, better positioning them to hold on to some of the 2010 gains.”
One dynamic that has emerged across the country is that partisan clashes over social issues has diverted legislatures from budget debates, when passing a budget used to be their main business, according to a report by the nonpartisan Pew Center on the States.
‘The new normal’
Conservative candidates often campaign on fiscal matters such as the budget, the economy, and jobs, said Elizabeth Nash, state issues manager for the Guttmacher Institute, a research center that focuses on reproductive health.
“But when they came to power what we quickly saw was this change from working on any of those issues to working on social issues, and one of the most prominent was abortion and specifically abortion restrictions,” Nash said in an interview.
In Alaska, the four Republicans being helped by Alaska Family Action are all staunchly anti-abortion. Bell and Coghill oppose abortion in any circumstance, according to the Family Action voter guide. Roses and Kelly say they would allow just one exception, to save the life of the mother.
Opposition to abortion even in cases of rape and incest is “becoming the new normal” for conservatives, said French, one of the Democrats being targeted. “It’s shocking, but that’s their position.”
His opponent, Bell, says he feels strongly about it. “That child hasn’t done anything wrong,” he said.
Still, Bell said he’s not campaigning on abortion or school vouchers and wouldn’t make them his top causes in Juneau.
“Those issues are very contentious. I would hope there would be a way of dealing with them without them being contentious and I’m not sure,” Bell said.
Under Senate President Gary Stevens, the bipartisan coalition agreed not to push certain hot-button measures.
Loren Leman, the staunchly anti-abortion former state senator and lieutenant governor, said if the Senate flipped to GOP control, the initial focus might be crafting a strict definition of medically necessary abortions, to cut how many the state pays for.
“It’s a big number right now and it doesn’t need to be that big,” Leman said in an interview at Minnery’s fund-raiser.
The anti-abortion activists at the event said they eventually want to end abortion outright.
In Indiana, one of the states cited by Minnery as a model for Alaska, nothing much had happened on abortion for years until 2011, when a more conservative legislature passed a number of restrictions, Nash said. “There was not enough opposition to stop them from essentially eviscerating women’s rights,” she said.
For his part, Gov. Parnell said he doesn’t have specific social legislation at the ready should the Senate turn.





Comments (41)
Add commentSounds about right, target
Sounds about right, target the only group trying to compromise and work for all Alaskans instead of just half. Way to go conservatives! You make us proud, ill gladly donate money to you so you can sabotage our democratic process some more!
Think about this
"Bell and Coghill oppose abortion in any circumstance, according to the Family Action voter guide. Roses and Kelly say they would allow just one exception, to save the life of the mother."
Your wife, daughter, or niece...gets raped and becomes pregnant as a result. These women and your family face a heartwrenching and personal decision. These politicians would have the government step in and force them to carry the rapist's spawn to term.
Is that something the government should be deciding?
What if your daughter was only 14 when it happened? Wouldn't matter to these extremists.
It's this kind of thinking that will sink the republicans. They have a pretty good message on fiscal responsibility, one that many people can agree with. But this wholesale intrusion of the government into our very personal lives...that is not acceptable by most of us.
And of course, at the core of the Alaskan races it's all about Sean Parnell's $2 billion (per year) giveaway to the oil companies. Think about what that will do to Alaska's budget, and Juneau.
And looky whose fingerprints show up: "It’s buying into a database launched by the wealthy and ultra conservative Koch brothers..."
If you were waiting before joining the fight... it's time.
It's a scary world
This article just illustrates that the GOP agenda is not to work for the good of the people. They want to take over the world with their ultra-conservative agenda and force the world into their narrow Christian agenda.
abortion issues
generally buck the political current. The GOP slams democrats for a larger government, yet here they are, trying to inject the government in the most personal of places.
Not in my BED! But my neighbor's is ok...
Conservative only in the social aspect. I laugh when I see the phrase "fiscally conservative" used to describe the GOP. 2 billion dollar giveaway is not fiscally conservative. Cutting taxes and ramping up military spending is not fiscally conservative. Enough with the charades. Republicans haven't been fiscally conservative for decades.
Conservative is the wrong
Conservative is the wrong term for these groups. More like hucksters looking for handouts for the oil and jesus industries.
Rough Cut: Romney is gonna come up a little short after they got got exposed in the last three debates as someone who can't decide which lie to tell next. Thanks too for reminding the democrats to all get out and vote though. You be sure and vote too December 6.
True fiscal conservative...
Government should refine, not restrict who can receive employee partner benefits. Politicians can have opinions but should not interfere with my right to choose what medical treatments I want to receive. Reduce the size of government, reduce the cost to the tax payer to grow the middle class by reducing the lower income levels and see a more prosperous country grow. I know who I'm voting for, but it isn't an easy choice.
Rough cut -
LOL! You must be looking at one of those Fox polls Fox viewers only polls - - - that statement doesn't jive with anything I've heard in the last two days.
Let me ask you this: Would you vote for someone who wanted to control your body? Say, made it a crime for just boys to have sex before they were 24? Or if a boy got a girl pregnant without marrying her he'd be forced to undergo temporary chemical castration? (if there were such a thing) Or if the government put a device on you to make sure as a young teen you didn't [filtered word] (what prudes we are - - pleasure yourself then...) more than once a day?
Men would NEVER stand for the kind of invasion into their bodies that they advocate for against women! And I don't think women are changing their minds about that one bit.
What has happened
...to the Republican party?
How can this group have become so twisted that they are willing to forgo Freedom of Religion - in order to force people who don't believe in Christianity to live by their rules, also brushing aside individual freedoms, each person's right to the persuit of happiness?
That they are willing to ignore the fundamental right of every person in this country to Vote, if by making sure certain people don't vote they can "win".
That they are willing to say to their wives and daughters that they are second class citizens, not deserving of the same pay or right to privacy as men?
This party has seriously turned from the ideals held as most sacred in this country for hundreds of years.
The idea that EVERY person has the right to vote.
The idea that EVERY person has the right to practice or not, the religion of their choosing, and that one religion will not dictate to those who do not believe it how they should live.
The idea that EVERY person is entitled to their individual liberty - to do and live as they choose.
We are talking about a party now that no longer believes in the foundation of what makes us America. And that is truly scary.
Rough cut......why?
Because they are directed at men? Have you considered that you think they are ridiculous simply because they are directed at you? How about if some gay man rapes you, you have to take care of his 1 year old child once he's caught and the child is taken from him? Any closer?
You can't imagine the government telling you what you can do with your body, or how to practice your sex life.
Guess what? Women can.
It's not rape, it's God's will!!!
Lat, you seem to forget the GOP view of rape and pregnancy. Pregnancy doesn’t occur in a legitimate rape (those pesky girls have a way of stopping that), It isn’t really rape when it’s God’s will right?, and let’s not forget the real truth that pregnancy never needs to be terminated to save the mother, that just doesn’t happen.
While I will support the case that these GOP conservatives who made such claims may not be representative of the entire group, the fact that there are so many in high level positions makes me wonder and a keeps me a bit scared.
Contractual Obligation uh er marriage
In my confused liberal mind, I believe marriage, in the eyes of the government, should be nothing more than a legal contract (how your religious foundations view it is an entirely separate discussion). With that in mind, the government should allow unions/marriages between two individuals of legal age and of sound mind in much the same way many contracts are entered into. That fact that that contract is being entered into by two women or two men is irrelevant. (Don’t bring up the dog or cat thing as they are not allowed to enter into contracts now are they?). While I love my wife and like to imagine the lofty squishy feelings surrounding our union and that wonderful day, the fact of the matter is, is that I have a contractual obligation to her.
Please keep your religion out of my legal contracts please.
I have never been so angry!
I have never been so angry!
Cut off their social conservtive dicks!
Clarify
Hey jan, could you clarify whose members/dicks you are refering? You made me flinch a little there.
Social conservatives want to
Social conservatives want to control our bodies?
So women have the same freaking right to control the bodies of male social conservatives.
If social conservatives think it is ok for a women to be forced to give birth, then they MUST pay HER to bring up the child!
If the Government over turns Roe V Wade and forces women to give birth then the Government must financially support these women and their children. I think at the very least $80,000.00 a year per child.
On top of this $80,000.00 per year the Government must pay for housing, and educating the child, also health care costs, clothing, food, toys, diapers, etc....
social issues under GOP-majority
what can the legislature do here, really?
Defund birth control? Go to the Rx or put it on Mom's shopping list...rubbers and pills are still legal;
Strip gay couples of benefits?...not without incurring wrath of ACLU;
Amend the Constitution?...not unless it's THE premier agenda item. Not likely.
Take away your birthday?...currently, yes, unless you already have one.
jan
you need to take 10 and breathe. I hope there are no knives in close proximity to your pos.
Funny
Rough, you name says it all! Ouch!!
So your point, grendel?
Trying to say it doesn't matter, so just elect em anyway?
Uh, no.
grendel,
nice try. A stacked legislature would guarantee the 2 billion dollar tax giveaway. No thanks. The senate is the only chance we as reasonable Alaskans have. You want the 2 billion dollar giveaway? Then how does a state sales tax sound? Stacked legislature in Alaska sounds like the end of Alaska's gravy train.
Not to mention ridiculous social policies that have plagued red states in the lower 48. Voter restriction, comes to mind. 24 legislatures in red states have presented legislation in the last two years that would allow governors to replace competent justices. No reason necessary. Say goodbye to our justice system. Legislatures have no power, but what about if it were stacked with dems? Would we have to worry about the communist takeover of our states? No, but stacked legislatures are powerful. You just forget how powerful when we're talking about a conservative majority.
Partisan hack is the correct term here...
my point, Lat58
pendulums swing. I'm saying that if this gang of 4 (er, 5) gets elected, what can they do? Their time in office cannot be solely dedicated to pushing these items unless there is nothing more pressing -- like Gov Parnell's tax break to Big Oil that has you wrapped around the axle. If they have successful terms they may get re-elected. If you are a one item voter, or blade enthusiast, dont vote for them - vote for other guy BECAUSE of it. But have faith in the political process and try not to get too excitable.
Sean Parnell better start
Sean Parnell better start setting money aside so our state can support the women that are forced to give birth, and yes do set aside $$$,$$$,$$$,$$$.$$ heartily Parnell.
Yes, Parnell: "this goes beyond just pure politics. It goes to who we are as a people,” Parnell said to the Alaska Family Action group. “If we are willing to stand for life as firmly as we are willing to stand for liberty, that is something we each share in common and we each will do together.” He urged everyone to “give heartily tonight.”
Pony up Parnell! it goes to who we are as a people!!
cheeesy
is 2 billion dollar tax giveaway a social issue? Sounds fiscal to me. Please re-read my subj. line, and take note of my polite tone.
Are you saying that governors in these states can rouse a justice out of bed, fire him on the spot, and put a toady in his place? You are getting excitable. Perhaps it's pre-election jitters.
U.S. Constitution
One of the forgotten powers that state legislatures have are to call for a constitutional convention, or ratify an amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Amending the Constitution to clarify the definition of a 'person' so it doesn't include corporations and unions is gaining momentum. Apparently conservatives' definition of a person is rather broad, from two cells to 10,000 shareholders.
Allowing our state legislatures to be controlled by these types would prevent corrections to our Constitution.
grendel,
you can pretend the two issues, social and fiscal are not linked, but how stupid do you think the rest of us are? Just because you commented on the issue as strictly social doesn't mean we should forget that legislaters look at and present both social and fiscal policy. You do realize this, right?
And yes, the proposed legislation by 24 red states in the union allow for governors to replace a justice with no fault. This is a social issue. I'm not sure how the time of day makes any difference. This affects the civil liberties of Americans. We have seen a general conservative takeover in state and federal lawmakers. Conservatives vote.
Getting excitable is ok. The tea party is foaming at the mouth.
See, if you can suggest Obama's second term will destory this country, and a conservative majority is nothing, then you are a partisan hack. Plain and simple. I see you make partisan comments all the time. Add them up, and it makes you a hack. Deflect all you want. You're the one trying to brush off a political powerhouse as no big deal, because the extreme legislation they propose is aligned with your extremism.
CP
you have this all gamed out, and have even anticipated my response down to last partisan extremist detail. You run with that, cheeesy, and I'll watch where it takes you. PHphphfiizzzzz...le.
@Lat
I agree. There are a couple of other things we should address as well...
How about redefining when commercial harvest of fish gets to occur so that Personal use fishermen and subsistence users get the first share of the quota as was intended?
@AH HA - now you're talking
Yes! REAL issues that are overdue for review and can, in fact, have an immediate impact. Lots of the commercial regs were drafted and fine tuned in the 60s & 70s and are now out of tune with the reality of the fisheries.
grendel,
Run with what? You've made the suggestion that America can't afford a second Obama term. You make it too easy. You're just too predictable.
A conservative majority is no biggie though... except for the fact that we are seeing the side affects of a conservative majority in red states across the nation and it is a biggie. We have examples. Run with the fact that you don't care about stripping civil liberties, piece by piece, and yet you fear more than anything the black guy in the white house getting a second term.
woops...
your woops
you pathetic little man, or fembot, or - whatever the he11 a cheesypoof is -- snack treat? I never said anything about race. That's all you, all you, and you just discredited anything you've ever said or will say for suggesting I'm about race. We're done here, shiteyes.
Roughcut
I used to be pro life. Roughcuts existence has led to a change of heart.