ANCHORAGE — The Alaska departments of Health and Social Services and Environmental Conservation warned Wednesday that an article in the December/January issue of Alaska magazine, titled “Hunting the Mighty Cockle,” contains incorrect information about the safety of eating recreationally harvested shellfish.
Contrary to information in the article, the departments say, shellfish can contain the toxins that cause paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) any time of the year. The DHSS Section of Epidemiology has received reports of Alaskans with PSP during every month of the year and has concluded there are no “safe” months.
In fact, pre-harvest testing by the Department of Environmental Conservation of commercial shellfish, sampled this week from Southeast Alaska, revealed toxic levels over four times what is considered safe for human consumption. Commercial shellfish that test positive for elevated levels of toxin are prohibited from being harvested or going to market.
Early signs of paralytic shellfish poisoning often include tingling of the lips and tongue. Symptoms may progress to tingling of fingers and toes, then loss of control of arms and legs, followed by difficulty breathing. Death can result in as little as two hours.
All locally harvested shellfish — including clams, mussels, oysters, geoducks and scallops — can contain paralytic shellfish poison. Crabmeat is not known to contain the PSP toxin, but crab guts can contain unsafe levels of toxin and should be discarded.
There is no way to tell if a beach is safe for harvesting by looking at it. Toxins can be present in large amounts even if the water looks clear.
Also, the toxin can remain in shellfish long after the algae bloom is over. PSP cannot be cooked, cleaned or frozen out of shellfish.
Commercially grown shellfish is tested and considered safe.
Alaska magazine is owned by Morris Communication Co., the same company that owns the Juneau Empire.





Comments (8)
Add commentIrresponsible Editors
That article should have never been published as written. Is there no editorial scrutiny at the magazine? The comment stating in so many words that the risk of PSP is diminished as water temperature drops is an example of the misinformation in the article. We have tested clams and cockles from the Shaman island area and have found hot clams just 20 feet away from clams that tested negative for PSP. They can be hot in any month and the same stretch of beach can have clams with and without PSP. Butter clams can stay toxic for up to 2 years.
Didn't a guy die a few years
Didn't a guy die a few years back here from psp?
Butter clams can concentrate
Butter clams can concentrate high levels of PSP toxin in their tissues, especially in the siphon area. Any explanation to the rapid expansion of toxic butter clams throughout southeast Alaska?
No way to know for sure. Pure
No way to know for sure. Pure Russian roulette.
No way to know for sure. Pure
No way to know for sure. Pure Russian roulette.
No way to know for sure. Pure
No way to know for sure. Pure Russian roulette.
Ok but...
Haven't people been harvesting cockles for many, many years abiding by the idea that it is safer in winter or months that have an r in them? Surely this has worked for a long time. Tragically people do die from eating something that is bad and that is teribly sad. But people also die from choking on hot dogs. Shall we ban those? Every bite you are playing russian rulette with your life (and your heart too). As with anything there are risk, but can't live in a bubble.
Expansion of Toxic Clams
I think that I can explain the expansion of toxic clams. Clams have legs! Sorry for the lame joke.