Some 46 percent of general fund allocations for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities in Gov. Sean Parnell’s proposed operating budget are marked for the Alaska Marine Highway System, House Finance Committee members were told Monday.
That $165 million “slice of the pie,” as represented on a pie chart in DOT&PF Administrative Services Director Mary Siroky, is the largest component of general fund allocations for the department in Parnell’s fiscal year 2014 operating budget proposal, topping highways and aviation combined.
However, it does not factor in the nearly $55 million the AMHS Fund is expected to contribute to DOT&PF funding in FY14 — the department’s fourth-largest funding source, behind unrestricted general funds, Capital Improvement Program receipts and the International Airport Revenue Fund.
Responding to a question from Rep. Paul Seaton, R-Homer, Legislative Finance Division analyst Rob Carpenter said in a subcommittee meeting Monday evening that situation is unique for the department.
“There is not anything similar to that in the highways and aviation,” said Carpenter. “I guess you could say that the Marine Highway System is our ‘toll road’ in the state.”
The AMHS Fund is classified as a designated general fund, according to Siroky.
“The designated general funds there are the revenues they bring in from passenger and car fares,” Siroky said during the Finance Committee meeting. “They also get a significant infusion of general funds as well.”
Siroky was responding to Rep. Scott Kawasaki, D-Fairbanks, who commented on AMHS’ share of allocations.
“Of course, the pie graph makes it look like it’s just this huge amount of cash compared to the rest of it,” Kawasaki said. He asked whether the AMHS takes the amount of its subsidy into account in calculating fare prices; Siroky responded that it does not.
According to DOT&PF spokesman Jeremy Woodrow, who did not attend the meeting, ferry tariffs were last increased in 2007, when they went up by 3.2 percent across the board.
After the exchange between Kawasaki and Siroky, Rep. Alan Austerman, R-Kodiak, co-chairman of the committee, quipped, “Rep. Kawasaki, what you don’t see on here is the designated general funds coming from toll roads.”
Finance subcommittees were also in action Monday, holding meetings on specific parts of the budget. The Transportation and Public Facilities subcommittee met Monday evening.
At the subcommittee meeting, Rep. Bob Herron, D-Bethel, asked recently appointed Commissioner Pat Kemp about the AMHS.
Herron referred to Kemp as “commissioner-designee” and asked him whether he was having second thoughts about accepting the job last month, in light of controversy that has erupted over the state’s decision late last year to abandon plans to acquire a proposed 350-foot Alaska-class ferry in favor of ordering two smaller “shuttle ferries.”
“Absolutely not,” Kemp responded immediately. He said of the change in direction on the ferry plans, “That’s something that had to be done. That project did get away from us, and we had to reevaluate.”
Herron then brought up last Tuesday’s meeting of the Marine Transportation Advisory Board. Unalaska Mayor Shirley Marquardt sits on MTAB, which has an advisory function for ferry issues in the DOT&PF, as its representative for Southwest Alaska, much of which Herron now represents in the Alaska House of Representatives after last year’s legislative redistricting.
“What reassurances were you able to give (Marquardt) and others that we will have a robust ferry system from Ketchikan to Unalaska?” Herron asked.
“I don’t believe I was asked the question in the MTAB meeting,” said Kemp. “But I think what we have to look at with the Marine Highway System is we have to look at the backbone of the system as being mainline ferries, and they would run from Bellingham (the AMHS port in Washington) out to the end of the (Aleutian) chain. And then I think the most cost-effective way to fill in the gaps and run a more efficient system is to run hub-and-spoke systems, and that is done with shuttle ferries.”
While Kemp holds the title of commissioner and is referred to as such on the DOT&PF website, he has not yet faced a confirmation hearing in the Alaska State Legislature. That comes Tuesday afternoon, when he will sit down in front of a joint meeting of the House and Senate Transportation committees.
Herron declined to comment after the meeting on whether he was satisfied with Kemp’s answers, noting it was his first opportunity to speak with Kemp since his appointment and that he is representing ferry communities in the Aleutian Islands and on the Alaska Peninsula for the first time this year.
“I’ll continue having these conversations with him,” said Herron.
Of Kemp’s stated plan for the ferry system, Herron said, “It might work, but I sure want there to be a lot more inclusion in the public process with the people that will ride the system, and the communities it will serve are fully engaged in this conversation. I don’t want it to be a top-down approach.”
• Contact reporter Mark D. Miller at 586-1821 or at mark.d.miller@juneauempire.com.





Comments (16)
Add commentMy take from this piece:
The money slash is coming for AMHS. Get ready for that single little shuttle ferry, at best.
The Leggies don't trust Kemp.
Do you trust
Kemp?
He reminds me of Bryan Butcher last session, er, umm, I dunno, Sean didn't tell me that.....I'll have to get back to you on that.
They don't trust anyone
They don't trust anyone Parnell appoints. Would you? At best it seems so far like he's just a mouth piece for the gov.
Remember during the auto
Remember during the auto bailout the executives drove electric cars to the meetings because of the crap they got for flying jets the time before? Maybe every person on the transportation board needs to ride the ferry from Bellingham to Unalaska in one straight shot. Or hell, just do the juneau Sitka ktown run.
I can say personally I will not put my rig on an open deck ferry, I know they haven't revealed anything yet but it doesn't seem likely they can build two for the price of one without some major sacrifice.
Everyone is an expert
Over half of all of dot's budget goes to AMHS. Did you all not read that part? A Fairbanks rep was on to it. When dot's budget starts getting cut do you think that Fairbanks rep will want roads and airports cut or ferries? We better build a more efficient system that costs less to operate or we won't have a system. Day boats have far less operational costs and that is why the change.
Spoiled
Alaskans enjoy the lowest motor vehicle fuel tax in the nation. Ferry riders pay a much higher percentage of the cost of transportation than drivers do. To make in even out drivers in Alaska would have to pay about a dollar a gallon tax. As it is now almost all the cost comes from oil money. When Parnell gets done with his big give away, the state won't have any money for roads or ferries.
Open deck ferries...?
Kemp shouldn't be confirmed DOT commissioner. Already he has shown that he is more concerned about his own agenda and less about state policy. His "build the road" mantra has been played here way too many times.
Weather Wise?
I'm curious if the shuttle ferries will be able to run the Lynn Canal during the winter months when the weather gets severe? We already have a few fast ferries that can't make the run in severe weather, will these shuttles really be operational year round?
Cutting costs is one thing
Cutting costs is one thing but a hub-and-spoke system?
AMHS income
I amazed how few actually read the information on the income of the AMHS. I know some folks just hate to accept facts like those. It far easier to use the information selectively than to put it into a real perspective. One third (1/3) of the ferry budget is funded by ferry user revenues; none of the road system is paid for by similar user fees.
It seems some people do not understand the ferry system is not only one of the supply routes into many villages and coastal communities but that it is a major factor in the tourism industry. During the tourism season one can hardly get passage on a ferry due to high levels of tourist.
What I'm seeing is the interior legislators from Fairbanks are in favor of that state funded gas line for those residents while not seeing the needs of other Alaskans who pay for the ferries.
KEMP
What a joke. I sat next to this guy at Donna's the other night while I dinner with my kids. His buddy was giving him a hard time because he still holds all the responsibilities he had prior to the AMHS appointment. They joked that they should just make a cruise ship class ferry. They don't give a ratsass about southeast. They just want push their appointed governors agenda. Nothing but political hacks here folks.\
DOT PF
It is easy to sit back in your easy chair and do the old arm chair political quarterbacking... Kemp didn't get the Job because the governor thought; here is a guy that will do what I tell him. The governor chose Kemp because he will stand up for what is right. He will make the tough decisions because it is the right thing to do.
We who ride the ferries in the Upper Lynn Canal know already
small shuttle ferries with an open deck or a partial open deck are going to fail.
The worst waste of money is building something not wanted that won't work. Been there, done that with the Fast Ferry Fiasco.
Kemp is bad on public process, worse on knowledge of community needs and ferries specifics for the Upper Lynn Canal, and rather shifty when dealing with budgets and costs.
Don't expect we'll see sound management on much of anything in Alaska until we have a new governor.
Kemp is off to bad start. He's flat wrong about small shuttle ferries in Upper Lynn Canal.
Rode the Mat from Juneau to Haines on Monday. Spray covered the windows. We were an hour an half late. No one could go on the outer decks without risk of being blown off in minus zero windchills. And that was moderate winds and seas.
No way is Kemp's (Parnell's) plan going to work.
Not-so-fair-weather
Kmkmci - this is exactly what I mean. The AMHS has so much potential, but its plans like these shuttle ferries that will give the whole system more bad accolades when a doomed plan fails. Rather than wasting funds on ships that aren't suited for Southeast Alaska, why not invest in the long term. How long have the Mal and the Mat been in operation? Sound investments for the long haul.
Not-so-fair-weather
Kmkmci - this is exactly what I mean. The AMHS has so much potential, but its plans like these shuttle ferries that will give the whole system more bad accolades when a doomed plan fails. Rather than wasting funds on ships that aren't suited for Southeast Alaska, why not invest in the long term. How long have the Mal and the Mat been in operation? Sound investments for the long haul.
Running a 'shuttle' ferry
Running a 'shuttle' ferry system in Northern Lynn Canal is mindbogglingly stupid. That run is currently the most profitable (or least cost consuming, if you prefer) route in the system. So the plan is to make new ferries with REDUCED capacity and hulls that make them more susceptible to weather problems. Is there any logic to that?