• Overcast
  • 57°
    Overcast
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

AMHS to look at operating MV Susitna

Borough trying to sell experimental ferry

Posted: February 4, 2013 - 9:14pm  |  Updated: February 5, 2013 - 1:00am

The Alaska Marine Highway System is developing a feasibility study to determine whether the M/V Susitna, a 195-foot experimental icebreaking ferry owned by the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, could fit into the ferry system’s operations, a spokesman for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities acknowledged Monday.

Jeremy Woodrow said in an email that the feasibility study, which has no estimated completion date, “will address the capital and operating costs associated with acquiring the MV Susitna and operating the vessel on potentially new routes within the state.”

The Matanuska-Susitna Borough is looking for potential buyers after the Borough Assembly decided the Susitna would cost too much to operate for intended runs across Knik Arm and around upper Cook Inlet.

AMHS officials inspected and rode on the ferry last fall, but Woodrow wrote, “The determination then was that AMHS did not have a route, or area with the demand that would work within the MV Susitna’s operational limitations.”

Borough Manager John Moosey said in an email Thursday evening that the DOT&PF had “politely rebuffed” an overture from the borough after borough staff met with Michael Neussl, then the deputy commissioner for marine operations, to discuss whether the AMHS could use the Susitna.

“I have recently contacted the Governor about renewed interest, in light of DOT department changes,” Moosey wrote, an apparent reference to Neussl’s resignation last month and the reorganization of DOT&PF portfolios under new Commissioner Pat Kemp. “We have had no further discussions.”

Woodrow indicated the feasibility study is being prepared now due to discussions with the borough and requests from state legislators to consider the option of adding the Susitna to the 11-ship AMHS fleet.

“It’s important to note that this study is strictly exploratory and does not guarantee that AMHS will expand its fleet via the (Susitna) or add new routes (or) ports to the system,” Woodrow added.

The Susitna was constructed as a U.S. Navy prototype for an icebreaking landing craft.

Rep. Paul Seaton, R-Homer, one of the legislators who has urged the DOT&PF to consider operating the Susitna, said that while the ship’s design is not conducive to the dock types at many Southeast Alaska ferry terminals, it is well-suited for serving a route in his southwestern Kenai Peninsula district.

“There’s a concrete barge-loading ramp right inside the Homer harbor, and there’s also one over in Seldovia,” said Seaton. “That’s what the Susitna is made for, is going onto a beach with a concrete ramp on it, and drive-on, drive-off.”

Seldovia, like Juneau and most other Southeast Alaska communities, is not connected to the North American road system. As a result, mainliners must shuttle passengers and vehicles across Kachemak Bay, between Homer and Seldovia, before proceeding along the west route to Kodiak and the Aleutian Island chain.

Seaton said he wants the AMHS to conduct an analysis of using the Susitna for the Homer-Seldovia loop because he thinks having a dedicated vessel for that run would improve Aleutian Island service.

“We could actually make the (M/V) Kennicott and the (M/V) Tustumena much more effective going out the chain and giving more service to the chain, because they wouldn’t have to be coming in and doing the shuttle back and forth between Homer and Seldovia before it went back to Kodiak and down the chain,” said Seaton, referring to the oceangoing mainline ferries that operate along that route.

The Kennicott normally provides service as far west as Kodiak. The Tustumena is currently the only ship to make regular runs along the Aleutian chain.

The Susitna was originally built in Ketchikan for about $80 million, with substantial federal assistance in the ship’s construction. It is now docked in Ward Cove.

In his email Thursday, Moosey wrote that there is no set asking price for the Susitna.

The DOT&PF is also looking at adding two “shuttle ferry” vessels to serve Lynn Canal as part of the retooled Alaska-class ferry project. Last year’s concept for one 350-foot ferry capable of extended runs was axed in December, as Gov. Sean Parnell and state officials announced it had gone over the $120 million allocated for the project.

Editor's note: This article has been updated to correct a typographic error and add information on current ferry routes.

• Contact reporter Mark D. Miller at 586-1821 or at mark.d.miller@juneauempire.com.

  • Comment

Comments (9)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
islander
1193
Points
islander 02/04/13 - 10:43 pm
1
0

I commend this idea

It is almost unbelievable that the AMHS would make such a practical approach to using the Susitna. Hopefully the MAt-SU Borough does not try to increase the price to a profit from the disposal.

timeinmemorial
232
Points
timeinmemorial 02/04/13 - 11:34 pm
2
1

Good idea

one mans trash is another mans treasure. Mat Su should give this vessel back to the State or pay back all the grants they received for this vessel.

snagger
8296
Points
snagger 02/05/13 - 07:52 am
2
0

Closer look......

I think we need to identify any individuals who were responsible for this screwed up project and make certain they don't get to screw up again!

kjashen
955
Points
kjashen 02/05/13 - 11:02 am
2
0

bad idea

For the state to take over the Susitna is a bad idea on many levels. First of all using it in Kachemak Bay from Homer to Seldovia will be quite difficult because although cars and pickups can go on the vessel, tractor trailor vans would have to be beach loaded. Barge ramps would not work. Anyone else see a problem with this? Fuel costs would also be prohibitive. I also hope Sen. Seaton's remarks are a simple reporters error rather than his alone. The Kennicott does not go out the chain. It would still run between Homer and Kodiak, which an intermediate stop (with all those vans, large boats etc.) in Seldovia only adds 5 hours to their schedule. Dropping one Homer stop in the winter would accomodate those 5 hrs nicely. Operating costs of the Susitna would most likely be up into the fast ferry troposphere and with reduced moneys in the budget be not conducive to running AMHS efficiently. All in all a bad idea, this is a vessel specifically built for a military mission, don't let the fancy paint job fool you.

kjashen
955
Points
kjashen 02/05/13 - 11:05 am
1
0

shuffle

the "shuffle" Seaton refers to is actually the Homer/Kodiak shuffle not the one to Seldovia....Kennicott goes Homer/Kodiak 5 times in the week they are in SW before heading back to SE, no chain trips at all.

artdirector1
0
Points
artdirector1 02/05/13 - 03:55 pm
0
0

It's being given away ... for free

According to the article that appeared in last weeks Yahoo News, it's being given away or sold for penny's on the dollar. Here's the link:

http://news.yahoo.com/alaska-borough-wants-away-expensive-ferry-22271787...

I'm amazed this wasn't mentioned in the Empire article.

30YearResident
2691
Points
30YearResident 02/05/13 - 04:25 pm
2
0

What is right by the state?

More work needs to be done to determine if the M/V Susitna, and its inherent operating costs, are in the best interest of the state. I bet there will be a substantial financial burden to the state to add her to the AMHS fleet; and she doesn’t help to standardize the system in any way.

northboy
329
Points
northboy 02/05/13 - 06:06 pm
0
1

Glad

Unpublished

I support air transportation, it is a lot cheaper and time effective. The state should get out of the transportation business and it go to the private sector like the Inter-island ferry system.

The reason that the 350 ft ship was scraped is that the Ketchikan ship yard can not build one that big and nobody wanted federal oversight to keep corners from being cut.

glacierdogs
1332
Points
glacierdogs 02/05/13 - 06:07 pm
0
0

Comment

Snagger is right. This is a big, expensive screw-up. It was federal money so over 45% of it is borrowed, with China and Japan being two of the largest lenders.

It's the young working people today who are getting shafted. Money like this screw-up is being wasted but young people will be taxed to pay it back one day. Young people paying taxes and Social Security today may one day look back and wish they had begun a rebellion.

We are today spending what those young people will one day not be able to spend. I hope they are able to find a way to return to productivity and escape this economy of health care and government.

SquarePegRoundHole
4
Points
SquarePegRoundHole 02/06/13 - 10:10 am
2
0

Enough Said.

I pray that the Management at AMHS is smart enough to not be suckered into this poison pill of a vessel by the smoke and mirrors of a good deal. The US Navy walked away from this pile for good reason. MTU Diesel engines? Mmm, lets think.... I wonder which other two AMHS ferries are equipped with those....oh that's right the Fairweather and Chenega...Awesome vessels in calm weather their long prohibitively costly and still ongoing engine drama has cost the state Millions of dollars in legal fees, lost revenue, and seemingly never ending repairs. Oh whats that? The Susitnas engines are contained in a sub service steel pod that makes the majority of the engine inaccessible? Any major engine work would require dry docking the ship and CUTTING OPEN THE HULL just to access certain components for repair or even scheduled maintenance? Enough Said.

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376863/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/
Fire Academy Graduation

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING