JUNEAU — A revised version of a bill that would define “medically necessary” abortions was introduced in the Alaska Senate on Friday, removing a reference to having cases of rape or incest “promptly reported” to authorities.
SB49, from Senate Majority Leader John Coghill, pertains to which abortions Alaska must pay for under the state Medicaid program. The initial version called for the Department of Health and Social Services to not pay for abortion services under the program unless those abortions are medically necessary or the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest and the rape or incest was “promptly reported” to law enforcement or public health authorities.
Coghill, in a news release Friday, said he intended for the bill to follow the language in the Hyde amendment, which bans all federal funds for abortion except in cases of rape, incest and when the life of the woman is at risk. When he realized it did not, he said he filed a sponsor substitute for the bill.
Some Democratic lawmakers and Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest had blasted the reporting requirement as dangerous for women in a state with high rates of sexual assaults.
“Though the removal of the insensitive requirements for victims of sexual assault is one step forward, the fact of the matter is this bill still places politicians between women and their doctors,” said Treasure Mackley, political and organizing director at Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest. “Restricting access to state-funded abortion is blatant government overreach and would restrict our fundamental right to privacy and equality protected by the Alaska Constitution.”
Mackley, in a statement, said the bill “remains dangerous for Alaskan women because the result will be to eliminate pregnancy options and compromise low-income women’s health and well-being.”
The Alaska Supreme Court has held the state must fund medically necessary abortions if it funds other procedures deemed medically necessary for people in need. Coghill said that with his bill, he is seeking to clarify “under which circumstances it is appropriate for the people of Alaska to pay for an abortion.”
The bill would define “medically necessary” abortions as those needed to avoid serious risk to a woman’s life or physical health. That could mean a serious risk of death or “impairment of a major bodily function” due to such things as renal disease that requires dialysis; congestive heart failure; coma; or “another physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy” that places the woman’s health at risk. Payment would not be allowed for “elective” abortions.
“We asked doctors and lawyers what they would recommend and what would follow the spirit of the Supreme Court’s decision,” Coghill said. “Senate Bill 49 gets that definition as clean and clear as it can be so that we can answer that constitutional question in a way that’s fair for all Alaskans.”





Comments (7)
Add commentLet's see...
...how OUR reps vote on this bill.
As much as I feel this is an
As much as I feel this is an obvious attempt at control over women, I didn't expect coghill to listen to opposition and take out what everyone saw as another restriction for restriction sake. That's something isn't it?
Place a woman as co-sponsor and I may ride this wave.
I feel there are many federal appropriations I oppose yet am impowerless to stop.
Yet Supreme Court rulings are subject to countless state legislative laws designed to thwart my Supreme Court decisions.
Something tells me my Supreme Court justices are not as supreme as I was lead to believe.
This is no place for our
This is no place for our Government to rear its head.
Dr. Coghill
I just checked; Senator Coghill has a high school eduction. I have no problem with that but, I wonder if Senator Coghill can give me a second opinion on my back surgery to see if it's medically necessary.
Mike Chenault House speaker
Mike Chenault House speaker has a GED go figure.
Concerned
Why not? Apparently these right wing knuckledraggers-not just the Alaskan ones- can legislate rape and medically necessary abortions.
To be in the 21st century and still have to deal with these legislators who still cannot let a woman decide for herself what is best for her body and her life-astounding. I would gladly want my tax dollars to pay for their vascetomies-I would consider it a public service. To thin out the herd of these "legislators"-these men who are obviously five hairs away from a baboon.
What about the impact of mental illness? What a pregnancy would do a mother with schitzophrenia ? She would be forced to give birth-assuming she realizes she is pregnant-and then what? Who takes care of the baby? What outlook does this newborn have?
Leave these decisions to the people who are qualified to make them-a woman and her physician.