• Scattered clouds
  • 57°
    Scattered clouds
http://sealaska.com
  • Comment

Alaska lawmakers face down GMO salmon

Murkowski asks Alaskans to contact FDA during extended comments

Posted: February 23, 2013 - 9:00pm  |  Updated: February 24, 2013 - 1:08am
Back | Next
About 130 people gather at Crescent Harbor in Sitka, Alaska, Saturday February 9, 2013, to demonstrate opposition to pending Food and Drug Administration approval of genetically modified salmon. Rally organizers encouraged people to send comments to the FDA before a February 25 deadline.(AP Photo/The Daily Sitka Sentinel, James Poulson)  JAMES POULSON
JAMES POULSON
About 130 people gather at Crescent Harbor in Sitka, Alaska, Saturday February 9, 2013, to demonstrate opposition to pending Food and Drug Administration approval of genetically modified salmon. Rally organizers encouraged people to send comments to the FDA before a February 25 deadline.(AP Photo/The Daily Sitka Sentinel, James Poulson)

Genetically-modified salmon is nearing federal approval for human consumption and Alaska’s sate and federal lawmakers have taken up torches against what they refer to as “Frankenfish.”

In the novel Frankenstein; or, “The Modern Prometheus,” author Mary Shelley’s subjects played out the uneasy relationship between man and his science and technology, and examined questions about the morality of man as a creator.

This tension is on more and more minds in the Lower 48 and Alaska as AquaBounty's genetically modified AquAdvantage nears approval for the dinner plate.

Many Alaskans see this new organism as a threat to human health and to the state's vital wild salmon market. Proponents of the Pout-salmon hybrid say the farmed fish will provide protein faster to a world with a growing demand for food

AquaBounty’s AquAdvantage Salmon is an Atlantic salmon, the species commonly raised in fish farms, spliced with the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of a Pacific Chinook ‘King’ salmon and the eel pout. These modifications push AquAdvantage Salmon to reach a larger market size of five to 12 pounds more rapidly than traditionally farmed Atlantic salmon. All AquAdvantage Salmon are female in the attempt to prevent reproduction, according to the FDA’s Draft Environmental Assessment. However, up to 5 percent could be able to reproduce. As an added measure of security, AquaBounty has said its genetically modified eye-eggs would be raised only by specific “physically-constrained fresh water culture facilities.” This removal of proximity from the ocean is expected to prevent the GMO from escaping into the wild environment.

The biotech firm AquaBounty of Maynard, Mass. has one more piece of red tape to cut before its AquAdvantage Salmon is approved for human consumption. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration released two draft reports in Dec. 2012 that recommend AquAdvantage approval. Public input on the Finding of no Significant Impact and Environmental Assessment was scheduled to end in February. The deadline was extended until April 26.

Murkowski said she encourages concerned Alaskans to weigh-in on the issue.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski said concerned Alaskans should speak up. She addressed the Juneau Chamber of Commerce on Thursday. “It is not only important about understanding what it is we are eating, it is also important to recognize what introduction of this fake fish could mean to the health of our own markets and to our wild fish stocks. It is important for the FDA to hear this.”

Murkowski said she welcomes the anti-GMO legislation advancing through the Alaska Legislature. House Joint Resolution 5 and Senate Joint Resolution BLANK oppose the FDA’s preliminary findings and ask for further examination of GM salmon. Should AquAdvantage win approval, the resolution asks that the product be labeled “genetically modified.”

Committee Substitute for House Joint Resolution 5 passed Alaska’s House of Representatives without objection on Feb. 20. It is now in the Senate awaiting a hearing in its only referred committee, the Senate Resources Committee.

The senator said American families don’t want genetically modified salmon.

“I wouldn’t serve it to my family,” Murkowski said. “And I certainly don’t want to serve it if we don’t know what we are eating ... We are messing with a perfectly good fish.”

Reps. Geran Tarr D-Anchorage and Scott Kawasaki D-Fairbanks sponsored a resolution that proclaims the state’s objection to the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the sale of genetically modified salmon in the U.S. FDA’s approval is the first for a genetically modified organism raised for the nation’s dinner plates.

If passed the resolution would not become law.

Tarr said the timing of the resolution coincides with the FDA’s public comment period. The resolution “will be considered public comment on behalf of all Alaskans,” Tarr said.

The House of Representatives passed HJR 5 with unanimous consent. Should the Senate do the same, Tarr said, the bodies would “speak in one unified voice against this application from AquaBounty.”

Tarr said FDA’s approval of AquAdvantage Salmon would be the first of its kind in the U.S.

“So that is a bold move,” Tarr said.

Tarr said she was concerned that the eel pout and Chinook hormones could have effects after consumption. She compared it to the use of bovine growth hormone.

Alaska has marketed its salmon wisely in the last two decades, Tarr said. It is known as a healthy product that comes from clean waters, she said. She said she wonders what would happen to its premium price when the price for AquAdvantage Salmon is expected be lower.

“We don’t want to undermine our wild salmon market,” Tarr said.

Tarr said the sponsors worked with Alaska’s Senate offices and with the fishing industry on crafting HJR 5. Alaska seafood products have huge potential, she said.

“It feels like the really wrong move when there is so much potential to market our wild Alaska seafood,” Tarr said.

For Tarr, GMO salmon is a personal issue, she said.

“I’m eager to work on this,” Tarr said. “And considering the timing, I’m putting a lot of my effort into it now. The success of the resolution comes from people recognizing that the time to do this is upon us.”

For more information about the FDA’s preliminary findings visit http://goo.gl/RIWfG.

• Contact reporter Russell Stigall at 523-2276 or at russell.stigall@juneauempire.com.

  • Comment

Comments (19)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Alaskastu
1650
Points
Alaskastu 02/24/13 - 12:04 am
1
1

While we eat genetically

While we eat genetically 'enhanced' corn everyday which joins many other genetically altered fruits and veggies we buy at the store I don't want to eat these fish. It only because it will effect alaskas fisheries. BUT I'll be the devils advocate and point out, making cheap healthy food is a good thing right? I am not a scientist and yield my opinion to the FDA on what is safe to consume. If they say its ok I'll take that over accusations with no facts or proof to back it up that its unsafe.
So..I'm conflicted lol. I see benifits as well as downsides and its tough, this could get cheaper food which is in desperate need but at the expense of a hit to our economy as well as many friends of mines livelihood.

JNUKara
8612
Points
JNUKara 02/24/13 - 01:36 am
1
1

AlaskaStu

You might eat genetically modified corn, and other GMO foods, but I definitely do not and neither does my family. There is quite a movement against GMO foods that you are apparently unaware of. Look for "non-GMO Project verified" labels to find non-GMO foods.

dogsalmon
4
Points
dogsalmon 02/24/13 - 03:43 am
2
4

GMO

GMO food is owned and patented by a select few. Monsanto owns the patent of GMO seeds and are suing individual farmers. GMO salmon would also be owned by a patent and the corporations that own GMO fish will take away the rights of the individual Alaskan fisherman to fish.

tomas
272
Points
tomas 02/24/13 - 06:59 am
3
3

don't lie

dogsalmon- whether you approve or disapprove of gmo fish, you should refrain from lies and scare stories.

princessbbdotcom
3
Points
princessbbdotcom 02/24/13 - 07:36 am
2
1

NO GMO PLEASE

Keep them off the market for 50 years. What is the rush. It needs more testing. Lots of testing. It should be tested for many years.
Remember in the 50's when science invented the wonder drug Thalidomide. It was approved by governments worldwide. It resulted in 1000's of birth defects. Be careful when someone says it is safe. Even government can make a mistake.

glasseye
362
Points
glasseye 02/24/13 - 08:12 am
2
2

Free Enterprise

I thought Republicans supported free enterprise and limited government. I guess that only applies in Alaska to the oil industry.

Latitude58
14495
Points
Latitude58 02/24/13 - 08:24 am
1
0

Consumer knowledge

Murkowski says she'd never eat it. Perhaps. But there was a recent genetic study of fish served in restaurants and in some cases 95% of the fish was not what was claimed. Frequently "Alaskan wild salmon" was actually Atlantic farmed salmon.

You might think you're eating non-GMO food, but how do you really know?

Perhaps Lisa should work on strengthening the penalties against falsifying the products we're paying for. And perhaps boosting the FDA's abilities to perform inspections and testing (though that of course would mean bigger government!).

bandit67
22
Points
bandit67 02/24/13 - 09:22 am
3
1

Protecting Salmon

It's great that our legislature appears to be unified in this effort to protect Alaska's salmon...but where was this concern a few weeks ago when there was widespread support to degrade our clean waters by passing HB80. All citizens need to make sure they are holding their lawmakers accountable and ensuring that their actions are consistent. There definitely seems to be some wavering on protecting our salmon when there are other big business interests on the table. After reading last week's report on the amount of money industry lobbyists are being paid to advance their causes this, perhaps, should not be such a surprise.

snagger
8296
Points
snagger 02/24/13 - 10:20 am
3
2

I'll try some...

Alaska has certainly chosen to opt out of producing farmed fish and the rest of the world has passed us by. I suspect the same will be true of GMO products. The world is hungry for quality protein and our wild stocks don't meet the demand.

Alaskastu
1650
Points
Alaskastu 02/24/13 - 10:24 am
2
1

I think you'd be surprised to

I think you'd be surprised to find that there is a lot more gmo out there then you think. 80% of all hard cheese made in US and UK uses a GMO enzym. And there's the fine line of what is GMO? Selective breeding of plants is considered genetically enhanced. I'm not saying you don't try and stay away from all foods that have been tampered with but thats becoming increasingly harder. Maybe if you shop at rainbow exclusively.
As I stated before I'm conflicted. But I will concede that over the past year or so i have been shopping at rainbow more and more :)

islander
1193
Points
islander 02/24/13 - 10:25 am
2
0

protecting who from what?

For the most part the fisherman I know care about their business first and foremost. They use the same claims over different species of natural salmon when it is time to argue over which is worth more and healthier for consumers. Fisherman want the highest value they can obtain for their fish. Meanwhile the retail price of salmon is making salmon a high priced choice for most Americans.

What I'm seeing in these argument over the GMO fish is more financial than anything else. Alaska has great salmon hatcheries producing a large part of the "natural" runs. It seems we already approve of playing with nature when it to our financial advantage.

JNUKara
8612
Points
JNUKara 02/24/13 - 11:13 am
1
2

I do shop at Rainbow - and

I do shop at Rainbow - and Fred's and Safeway also have a large amount of Organic/non-GMO foods. I bought 5 bags of groceries at Safeway on Thursday - all organic/non-GMO foods, labeled with the Non-GMO Project Verified label.

snagger
8296
Points
snagger 02/24/13 - 11:31 am
2
0

True believers!!!

Horsemeat in Europe---for how many years? I wonder if it was organic or non GMO? $$$$$$$$$$

AH HA
1640
Points
AH HA 02/24/13 - 01:31 pm
1
0

How odd...

Even though our 'Hatchery' fish are significantly modified we worry about these GMO fish...

AlaskaNana
503
Points
AlaskaNana 02/25/13 - 02:23 am
0
1

AH HA

The fish they are going to produce are made from three completely different species of fish and are significantly modified. Please explain your comment that hatchery fish "significantly modified"? How, with what process are they modified from their natural original state?

iamright
13
Points
iamright 02/25/13 - 03:22 am
2
3

Our lawmakers better be

Our lawmakers better be facing this. Aqua bounty will sue our fishermen out of business. The real threat is Aqua bounty will own all the offspring even if that offspring is half wild salmon, and just like Monsanto sued farmers into bankruptcy even ones that proved they never planted Monsanto seed and their seed was contaminated by Monsanto seed the farmers lost. Harvard did the same thing with the onca mouce, They sued and won. Aqua bounty’s fish get loose and they will sue our fishermen out of business or require them to pay royalties for the half wild and half GMO salmon every salmon with the GMO gene belongs to Aqua bounty even if it is half wild salmon. It will put trident in a good position they will be the only ones who can pay to fish. This includes sport and subsistence fisherman also.

I don't care what you eat you can decide that for yourself but GMO patents are a way create a monopoly on anything that gene can contaminate from plants and their offspring to mice to fish to the Breast cancer gene Braca 1 and ll owned by Myriad Genetics who has also sued hospitals doctors and universities for looking at the gene.

AH HA
1640
Points
AH HA 02/27/13 - 10:15 am
1
2

@Alaskanana

They are modified through genetic selection. even though one can start with native stock eggs and milt the Hatchery conditions are significantly different from those that exist in the wild and will invariably produce a significantly altered stock of fish within one or two generations. Several recent studies have confirmed this, If I recall correctly the last one I looked at was done by the university of Oregon.

AlaskaNana
503
Points
AlaskaNana 02/27/13 - 01:30 pm
1
0

@Haha

The study that I think you are referring to was done at a Steelhead Hatchery on the Hood River in Oregon. Steelhead are declining numbers in this river and their reproduction in hatcheries was expected to help increase reproduction rates in the wild. Other salmon species when returning from the ocean to their spawning location spawn and die, steelhead can spawn and return to the ocean and then return to their spawning location and can spawn multiply times, enabling them to mix and spawn with non hatchery fish, thus increasing wild steelhead. The have fish adapted genetic traits for surviving hatchery rearing conditions. One of the concerns of the study was that being reared in a hatchery may affect their genetic ability to reproduce in the wild, overcrowding was one of the concerns. The study also found that steelhead can naturally and quickly evolve, in a few generations or less., not thousands of years as expected. The brood stock and eggs produced in a hatchery are not individually genetically selected and are wild fish. The fish have not been genetically modified in any way by biologist or scientist, unlike the fish being genetically modified by Aqua Bounty. Yes, hatchery fish in this study have modified their genetic make up naturally to adapt to their rearing location. The study points out that the results may cause the hatchery to improve its rearing procedures to address the problems found in the study.

Your comparison of hatchery fish and GMO fish in this case are completely irrelevant, like comparing apples to oranges.

Here is a quote from the second to last paragraph in the article... “It remains to be seen whether results from this one study on steelhead generalize to other hatcheries or salmon species,”

This is the website address for the study:
http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2011/dec/hatcheries-change-steelh...

I personally don't believe that GMO fish or farmed fish is healthy for the environment or for consumption by people. And yes, I support fish hatcheries. For me "Keep it Wild" is the way go.

PS. HAHA, if this was not the study you were referring to let me know.

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376863/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/359852/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376858/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376853/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376843/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/368637/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376838/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/376833/
Fire Academy Graduation

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2270
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING