ALL ACCESS MEMBERSHIP

JOIN NOW ACTIVATE SIGN IN
  • Overcast
  • 37°
    Overcast
  • Comment

Education funding picture still murky

Latest proposal includes $124M toward education

Posted: April 19, 2014 - 11:11pm
Back | Next
Senate Finance Co-chair Kevin Meyer, R-Anchorage, left, speaks to Sen. Donny Olson, D-Golvin, as  the Senate Finance Committee reviews the latest version of the Governor's education bill at the Capitol on Friday.   Michael Penn | Juneau Empire
Michael Penn | Juneau Empire
Senate Finance Co-chair Kevin Meyer, R-Anchorage, left, speaks to Sen. Donny Olson, D-Golvin, as the Senate Finance Committee reviews the latest version of the Governor's education bill at the Capitol on Friday.

Democrats, teachers, parents and school officials aren’t happy with what appears to be the future of education funding in Alaska.

Their unhappiness comes as members of the powerful Senate Finance Committee recommended funneling $124.3 million toward education this year — that’s $24.3 million more than was proposed Friday.

“With this legislation, not only will we increase funding for public schools, Alaska’s students will have more career and technical training opportunities, and more charter school opportunities,” Republican Gov. Sean Parnell said in a statement praising the committee’s work on the bill.

As the Legislature enters the final day of the 2014 session, the issue is far from settled. The bill still must clear the Senate floor where Democrats are expected to offer changes to the bill.

Once approved by the Senate, the House will have to agree to the upper body’s changes, which is hardly guaranteed.

The plan calls for $100 million in one-time funding in each of the next two years. Senators opted to put money outside of the formula so the state could conduct studies evaluating the funding formula, construction and design and salaries and benefits.

Still, the money is not being proposed via a permanent increase to the Base Student Allocation, a per-pupil funding mechanism, so school districts will have trouble counting on that money in future years, multiple school board members told the Empire Saturday.

“I want it so the community doesn’t have to worry if the money is going to be there, or if they’re going to have jobs,” Juneau School Board member Andi Story said. “This is still going to mean cuts when we do budget predictions in the fall.”

If passed as-is, the bill would send approximately $2.6 million in new funding to the Juneau School District, which recently passed a budget with $4.5 million in cuts, said David Means, the district’s director of administrative services.

In addition to $75 million in new funding to school districts, the bill includes about $24.3 million in funding for a number of other programs such as increasing schools’ broadband internet speeds, a middle school pilot program and giving more assistance to correspondence and charter schools.

Juneau stands to gain less than $100,000 from the broadband component, and the charter school funding should send about $235,000 in new money to the Juneau Community Charter School, Means said.

But the state is not picking up the full tab on the $24.3 million added between Friday and Saturday — municipalities are being told to split that increased cost with the state.

That’s an increased cost to the City and Borough of Juneau of approximately $734,000 as the city faces a $12 million budget shortfall over the next two years.

“A straight tax increase on ordinary citizens doesn’t add a penny to the district,” CBJ Assemblyman Jesse Kiehl said. “But it does make it harder on Juneau taxpayers.”

Kiehl also works as a legislative aide to Sen. Dennis Egan, D-Juneau.

He added that the city would have to choose between cutting services or raising taxes to come up with the increased costs.

School officials and education advocates have urged lawmakers since early in the session to increase funding via the BSA so the extra funding is guaranteed.

“The BSA increase provides the district’s stability in knowing that they’re going to get a certain amount of money in future years,” said Rep. Sam Kito III, D-Juneau. “Having one-time money, even over three years, does not provide that certainty. After those three years, the budget could go back down to where the BSA is (now).”

Anchorage School Board chair Tam Agosti-Gisler said the funding mechanism in the current version of the bill makes budgeting future years “extremely difficult.”

“It’s hard for current legislators to say what future legislators will do,” she said. “There’s no certainty here.”

  • Comment

Comments (5) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Steven Rosales
682
Points
Steven Rosales 04/20/14 - 09:48 am
3
4
Sad thing

is the Dept. of Education has spent umpteen dollars over the last 20 year on the federal level only to have droput rates increase as well as sub standard test scores . Breakdown of the traditional American Family has a huge impact on the outcome of a childs education. I know that I am tough on my kids and my wife checks over their homework daily and our kids really benefit from that.

James Coleman
2204
Points
James Coleman 04/20/14 - 02:10 pm
2
4
Taste of own medicine?

The school districts are given funds for about 3 years, after that its open ended. It could go up or down. The Democrats don't like this at all. Why is it when Obama does his job stimulus and Medicare/Medicaid expansions for 3 years (after that the states are on the hook) they think this is great. They apparently don't like the taste of their own medicine.

Judy Hodel
4720
Points
Judy Hodel 04/20/14 - 05:36 pm
3
1
Money Grab

The ultimate goal seems to be privatization of public education. They want to weaken public schools and then ditch them in favor of for-profit private schools.

The only choice local communities will have is to increase local school taxes to cover the difference.

It is a money grab, nothing more.

It will help well off families educate their children at the expense of the poor who will be left at underfunded public schools.

Judy Hodel
4720
Points
Judy Hodel 04/20/14 - 03:47 pm
3
1
A Pretty Name

Charter ( a pretty name for Private ) schools and public schools are not sisters, unless Cain & Abel got a sex change,

The Private charter is out to kill the public !!

It doesn't matter what color tarp you cover diarrhea with its still diarrhea, Charter, Private, Religious, It all takes away from the Constitutional protection of a free PUBLIC education.

Steven Rosales
682
Points
Steven Rosales 04/20/14 - 04:57 pm
1
3
Judy

why do you care where a child gets his or her education?

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/378073/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/378058/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/378053/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/378048/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/378043/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/378038/
  • title http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/378028/ http://spotted.juneauempire.com/galleries/378023/
Slideshow | Soboleff Ceremony

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-3028
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING