• Overcast, light rain
  • 55°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

Kito weighs in on SB21, 'The Road'

Juneau lawmaker shares concerns with each project

Posted: May 23, 2014 - 12:04am
Rep. Sam Kito III speaks to the Juneau Chamber of Commerce during their luncheon in the Alaska Room at the Juneau International Airport on Thursday.  Michael Penn | Juneau Empire
Michael Penn | Juneau Empire
Rep. Sam Kito III speaks to the Juneau Chamber of Commerce during their luncheon in the Alaska Room at the Juneau International Airport on Thursday.

There are multiple sides to every issue, and Juneau’s Democratic representative, Sam Kito III, made sure to touch on both sides of two of the hottest topics in Juneau these days.

The first of those being: When Alaskans go to the polls this August, should they repeal SB21? The state’s new oil tax system has been labeled a “giveaway” by Democrats while officially called the “More Alaska Production Act” by its supporters.

The second issue, whether the state should build a road out of the capital city, doesn’t carry the same debate-sparking potential statewide. But in Juneau, “The Road” can be as divisive as any other piece of public policy.

Speaking to the Juneau Chamber of Commerce crowd, Kito was noncommittal on both issues while highlighting aspects of each that concern him.

During his opening remarks, Kito started to discuss the SB21 issue, but quickly reverted back to prepared notes before offering his opinion. During a question and answer session following his speech, Kito was asked if he — like “the majority of Alaskan businesses” — is opposed to the repeal of SB21.

“I’m still in the decision-making process here; I wasn’t around when SB21 passed,” Kito said.

In a Q&A published in the Juneau Empire when he was appointed earlier this year, the Juneau Democrat took a stronger stance.

“I don’t know all the details. I do know I have concerns we’re giving money away in a time we’re seeing declining budgets ... at this point, I don’t believe (SB21) was the best way to move forward,” Kito said in that report. We went on to say, “... at this point, I am personally in favor of repealing SB21.”

He told the chamber that oil prices are at a “sweet spot” where both SB21 and the previous oil tax system are producing the same returns for the state, but that world events could indicate oil prices are on the rise — a fact that, if true, would result in less money for the state under SB21.

“If (oil prices are) going to be increasing, I’m concerned that, perhaps, we may have left money on the table that, with our declining revenue situation, could be very important for state services,” Kito said.

Republicans and other supporters of the new oil tax structure have pointed to billions of dollars of new investment on the North Slope as supporting evidence for their cause. Opponents say that is a facade by oil companies and not indicative of better days ahead.

Juneau Access

The road is “estimated at over $500 million to complete,” Kito said. “Do we receive $500 million in commerce or revenue back to the state or the city? That’s a tough one to support.”

He said that while the road would eliminate a costly ferry route that runs north from the Auke Bay ferry terminal, the project’s savings are mitigated by its proposed shuttle ferry near Haines.

“You still have 12 hours worth of fuel ... and then you’re going to have an additional 65 miles of road to maintain,” Kito said. “I haven’t seen the numbers that show that to actually balance out to the state’s favor, so I’m concerned we actually end up increasing the operating budget.”

He told the audience that, for him, this issue is about the timing of the project rather than it’s non-fiscal merits.

“I’m not sure this is the right time to spend a significant amount of money on a project that the state doesn’t seem to get any revenue from,” he said.

• Contact reporter Matt Woolbright at 523-2243 or at Follow him on Twitter at

  • Comment

Comments (7) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Clay Good
Clay Good 05/23/14 - 07:03 am
Vote for Sam Kito!

Sounds like he has his priorities right.

James Coleman
James Coleman 05/23/14 - 07:11 am
Do something

Our pipeline is near empty and has been for some time. With SB 21 we have seen activity. Façade or not, its the activity that matters. We should not be taking a back seat to states like S. Dakota who are raking in millions while we can't pay for our schools.

Art Petersen
Art Petersen 05/24/14 - 11:08 am
It's not just the high cost

of building "the road" from Juneau. It's building an inconveniently long road to another ferry terminal. It's not just maintaining a road that not only will be expensive to maintain with its normal repair and snow removal. But even more, with its many landslide and avalanche zones, it's trying to keep a road open that cannot be done at a reasonable cost nor even reliably kept open. Add the travel danger factor, and it's just all too much when there's already a safe, reliable highway, the Alaska Marine Highway.

Karl Ashenbrenner
Karl Ashenbrenner 05/23/14 - 08:03 am
I would

like to see the true cost of the road. In the 90's the DOT scoping sessions estimated the cost at just under a Billion dollars then the price dropped to 253 million and is now set at 500 million. Hell of a range don't you think? With all the rhetoric now in Alaska about "increased production costs", "skyrocketing material costs" etc by the oil industry, why is DOT holding the line on what the road will cost?

Karl Ashenbrenner
Karl Ashenbrenner 05/23/14 - 08:06 am
James Coleman

please send me 10,000 dollars and I promise to run around the yard and put up signs about how great you are.....remember it is the activity that matters. ;-)

Back to Top


  • Switchboard: 907-586-3740
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-586-3740
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Business Fax: 907-586-9097
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-523-2230
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback