We're sorry, but the page you were seeking does not exist. It may have been moved or expired. Perhaps our search engine can help.
The gloves are coming off in a looming legislative fight over changes to Alaska's oil and gas production taxes.
Democrats in the state House sharply criticized a series of advertisements calling for modifications of the tax sponsored by petroleum industry support companies, and said the tax is not curtailing investments by the producing companies or hiring in the industry.
"It's clear that petroleum jobs in Alaska are up, investments are up and that profits are healthy, particularly in Alaska. The Department of Revenue has clearly laid this out in their recent report on the tax," said House Minority Leader Rep. Beth Kerttula, D-Juneau, in a briefing in Juneau Feb. 2.
"We fought hard for the changes to ACES (Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share statute) in 2007. If it hadn't been for that tax change Alaska would be in a financial crisis right now. We benefited to the tune of $5 billion in additional revenues over the last two or three years," because of the tax change, Kerttula said.
Two Republicans in the state House, Reps. Craig Johnson and Clarisse Millet, both of Anchorage, have introduced bills lowering the oil tax rate and Gov. Sean Parnell said he supports changes in the tax that would expand investment tax credits for certain types of oil field development work.
Almost all members of the House Republican Majority, including House Speaker Mike Chenault, R-Nikiski, signed a letter to Parnell in December asking the governor to investigate whether the tax is harming investment.
Kertulla and her Democratic colleagues in the House are willing to tinker with the tax, and consider changes proposed, but will oppose a major change because it can't be justified, she said.
Industry employment has increased by 2,000 since passage of the tax increase in 2007, she said. Investments have also increased and are expected to increase again in 2010 and 2011, according to information given to the Department of Revenue by the industry.
Rep. Harry Crawford, D-Anchorage, appeared with Kerttula at the briefing and said that rumors of layoffs among contractors for the industry can be misleading because people working on projects are laid off and rehired frequently as projects are completed and new ones started.
"I've worked a lot on the North Slope and I can tell you that it's common to work for two or three different employers during a year," particularly for union members, Crawford said.
"I worked for three different companies in the Kuparuk field one year on different projects. One year I had W-2 (tax) forms from 11 different employers," he said.
Kertulla said only one Alaska producing company, ConocoPhillips, breaks out its Alaska profits. The company reported a $1.5 billion profit from its Alaska operations in 2009, while experiencing a loss on its worldwide operations.
"Since ACES was passed in 2007, ConocoPhillips has reported $6 billion in Alaska profits," Kerttula said.
Brian Wenzel, ConocoPhillips Alaska's finance vice president, said he was disappointed that legislators don't look more thoroughly at the numbers and the bigger picture they present.
"Our return is based on major investments we've made in Alaska, including $20 billion in the last decade," Wenzel said.