Paying not to fish

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008

In the last 10 years, the fishing quotas for commercial and sport fishing have declined significantly. We are told that this is necessary because of the decline in the amount of fish in Southeast.

Anybody who has been fishing knows this is true, and now we go further and fish longer for one-third the fish. Commercial fish hatcheries have, in the past, helped some, but today the real problem is known to many of us that have fished Southeast Alaska more than 15 years.

In the early 1990s, some of us complained to the Department of Fish and Game that the herring stocks were getting too low to sustain the hatchery fish and the wild stocks. We were told that there was plenty of herring and that they would manage the herring populations to ensure feed for all the fisheries.

Well people, this did not happen. We have complained to Fish and Game, the Board of Fisheries and even the governor, and the quotas you have today are a result of obscene management of the herring populations.

So now it is up to you, if you have any concern at all. Please make your voice heard or you will be down to no fish.

The feed (herring) will be gone unless the people of Alaska and especially those that make a living from fishing, demand an end to herring fishing for a couple of years.

The government pays farmers not to farm, why not pay herring fishermen not to fish? It would ensure feed for all critters that swim in the ocean and the survival of the commercial fishermen in Alaska.

When they wipe out the last remaining herring spawn in Sitka this year, it's all over folks. Don't let what happened in California, Oregon and Washington happen here.

Former sport fisherman


Trending this week:


© 2018. All Rights Reserved.  | Contact Us