If the wolf bounty protects deer, so be it

Letter to the editor

Posted: Friday, April 06, 2007

Connie Brady's March 28 letter about the wolf bounty is unreasonable.

Sound off on the important issues at

For starters, humans have been changing the environment around them for a long time, and I can guarantee that we're not going to stop. For example, look at New Orleans. They have constantly re-dug the channel for the Mississippi River to keep the city there - not a good idea, but it was still done.

Brady was writing from Las Vegas. The city has to ship in water just so it can survive - still more changes of surrounding environment.

If the Department of Fish and Game has a good reason for putting a bounty on wolves, it should. If a bounty on wolves will protect some of the very few deer still around after this winter, it sounds like a good idea to me. If keeping the environment stable in Alaska means putting a bounty on wolves so the wolf population can be thinned out, so be it.

McKenzie Wilson


Trending this week:


© 2018. All Rights Reserved.  | Contact Us