Word of mouth

Posted: Sunday, May 07, 2000

Does anyone else have a problem with the 100-foot-wide-plus stream corridor policy of the CBJ? I feel that if I can't have a use of that portion of my property, why should I be paying the same tax for that part of the property as the rest of the property that I can build on or use? Is this a case of local government taking control of asset and then taking taxing me for that asset? How about valuing the stream corridors at a lower level?

Me and Go-Go Joe like it better on South Franklin Street before tourism.

I know its fun to cruise around when the weather's nice, but please slow down when you're in neighborhoods. Killing a kid could ruin your whole summer.

I support tourism for Juneau, but I don't think that flightseeing is tourism. It's just one aspect of the tourism industry. I support peace and quiet and tourism.

First we get front-page news on two girls and one's had a sex change to become a man. Now we get two women kissing. You could had done the story and left the picture out. Some of us do not care to see this.

Related Searches


Trending this week:


Juneau Empire © 2015. All Rights Reserved.  Terms of Service | Privacy Policy / About Our Ads