I read both of Myrna Gardner's letters. In both of them she supports legislation that says, "if a man impregnates over three women and isn't married to her and doesn't pay child support, he should be circumcised. ... I meant to say, he should have a vasectomy."
I won't assume that these were simply "anti-male" letters. What about women that keep having kids with different men she can't even name? Do we just give them more welfare or should there be a similar law for them?
It is true there are males that impregnate women minus marriage vows and don't follow through with money. However, since I raised three daughters as a single father you can't convince me that it is all a male issue.
Come on. It takes two. Why all these letters lately saying all the positives are the females and all the negatives the males?
Juneau Empire ©2013. All Rights Reserved.