Family asks to rebuild in park

Lawyer says Park Service hasn't the right to require permits

Posted: Wednesday, July 13, 2005

ANCHORAGE - An attorney for the Pilgrim family told federal appeals judges that the National Park Service has no right to conduct a formal environmental review or create other roadblocks before granting access to their land within a national park.

Russell Brooks of the Pacific Legal Foundation asked a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a lower court ruling that the Park Service could require a permit before the family could use a bulldozer to haul a trailer carrying supplies over a 14-mile road into Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve.

The three Appeals Court judges, William A. Fletcher and Melvin Brunetti and Alfred T. Goodwin, did not immediately rule in the case.

The family patriarch, Papa Pilgrim, whose real name is Robert "Bobby" Hale, his wife and 15 children bought a 410-acre parcel within the park in spring 2002. The lived in an old miner's home, which burned.

The family is deeply religious and tries to live off the land. Their cause was taken up by the American Land Rights Association and others who solicited donations to replace supplies lost in the fire.

The family wanted to use a mining road to bring in heavy supplies from McCarthy to winterize a new home. The Pilgrims used a bulldozer to reopen the road without a permit. The Park Service responded by closing the road to motorized vehicles, and the family sued.

District Court Judge Ralph Beistline in November 2003 denied the Pilgrim family motion for a temporary restraining order, saying the Park Service was justified in wanting to assess the environmental impact of reopening the road.

Pacific Legal Foundation is a group that champions constitutional and private property rights.

Brooks said the Pilgrims were denied fair and adequate access to their property as promised in the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. The Park Service could take steps to ensure park assets were not harmed, he said. Extending that to a review under the National Environmental Policy Act, which took more than nine weeks, was a violation of the ANILCA mandate, he said.

A temporary, one-year access permit issued in March 2004 authorized the Pilgrims to use their bulldozer and trailer over the road when the ground was frozen. That permit was issued late in the winter, Brooks said, and the road was too dangerous to use because of glaciation on mountainside sections. Likewise, the road was too dangerous to use after freeze-up last October, Brooks said.

The Park Service made unreasonable demands while nominally allowing access, Brooks said after the court hearing.

"They can come off looking like the good guys," he said of issuing the permit. "It's useless."

Department of Justice attorney Matthew Sanders said it was clear from ANILCA and previous court cases that the Interior Department secretary could decide what constituted reasonable access through a national park.

Trending this week:


© 2018. All Rights Reserved.  | Contact Us