I love $4 gas. It makes me appreciate freedom. I watch as the dollars spin and think, "You, Triceratops, did not get squished by an asteroid in vain. You got squished for a $60 drive to Vegas."
So I didn't go to Wednesday's MoveOn.org protests against high gas prices, which included one at the most expensive gas station in the Los Angeles area, the Union 76 in Beverly Hills. MoveOn's news release explained: "We want to make sure the world knows that Beverly Hills residents are fed up with gas prices and want a president in the White House who will bring the cost of gas down." MoveOn always understands the problems plaguing Americans, such as the cost of gas in Beverly Hills. If the group succeeds on this issue, I hope it will next tackle the onerous two-year contract on the new iPhone and how late heirloom tomatoes arrived this year.
If MoveOn and Barack Obama really were going to confront America bravely with hard, necessary truths, they would tell us how great $4 gas has been for us. With public transit use nationally at a 50-year high, traffic dropped 2.1 percent in the first four months of this year across the country. That mileage reduction - along with people driving smaller cars, and more slowly, to save gas - could mean that 12,000 fewer people will die in traffic accidents this year, according to a study by professors Michael Morrisey at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and David C. Grabowski at Harvard Medical School. Air pollution has been reduced enough, according to economics professor J. Paul Leigh at the University of California, Davis, to prevent 2,200 respiratory-related deaths over the past year. Less eating out and more walking and biking could mean a 10 percent reduction in obesity, according to Charles Courtemanche, an assistant economics professor at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. And, apparently, higher gas prices also keep econ professors employed.
Yes, it's easy for me to revel in $4 gas because I'm rich. And because my wife and I own a Mini Cooper and a Prius. And because I work at home. And because some of the mutual funds I own contain a fair amount of Exxon Mobil stock. And because I'm brave enough to ignore the manufacturer's suggestion to use high-octane gas.
Cheap gas is unfair. Driving creates huge social costs in the form of traffic, health-damaging pollution and global warming that aren't suffered solely by the person buying the gasoline. Governments usually set up idiotic systems to offset such social costs (emissions trading, ethanol subsidies, taco truck regulations) instead of forcing individuals to pay for their own mess by adding a tax to remedy the imbalance. That kind of tax - the most fair kind, really - is called a Pigovian tax, and its use is why gas costs $8 to $10 a gallon in Europe, where they have fewer road deaths even though they drive like complete idiots.
If the U.S. were to jack up gas taxes slowly until we're in the $8 range, life would be better. We not only would be safer and have reduced greenhouse-gas emissions, but we probably would be happier too. Studies show that the only thing that consistently increases personal happiness is social interaction; high gas prices have led to real estate prices falling faster in suburbs and exurbs than in cities, so we soon might have more content downtown-dwellers. Those same studies show that the thing that makes people least happy is commuting, and telecommuting is way up this year. We could use the tax revenue to fund public transportation. And we would go back to the days when driving a car was a way to show people what a rich jerk you were. In other words, we no longer would need SUVs for that.
As bummed as I am to pay a lot for gas, it's a fair price for improving society. I also think government should look into some kind of heavy taxation on Facebook usage.
Joel Stein is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times.