Tolls should fund second crossing

Posted: Tuesday, October 05, 2010

Like many others, I've followed the debate over a proposed second crossing of Gastineau Channel. I personally would use a second crossing because it would reduce the miles that we drive, the gas that we consume, and the wear and tear on our vehicle. I propose that the second crossing be paid for by the users through a toll collection system. Over time, the toll fees would flow back to the city to recoup out-front expenditures.

I value the wetlands for the wonderful diversity of flora and fauna, and believe that we should do our best to protect these values. A crossing constructed of fill, culverts and a bridge would have an adverse effect on the natural values of the wetlands, and should not be built. A crossing structure elevated on pilings would greatly reduce the negative impacts on the natural values and provide the desired second access to Douglas Island.

Craig Lindh


Related Searches


Trending this week:


© 2018. All Rights Reserved.  | Contact Us