Empire Editorial: Half of something better than all of nothing

  • Thursday, September 29, 2016 1:00am
  • Opinion

Alaska Sen. Bill Wielechowski needn’t worry about what happens if his lawsuit fails. He should instead worry about what happens if he wins.

There are 700 million reasons why.

The Anchorage Democrat filed a lawsuit earlier this month challenging Gov. Bill Walker’s authority to reduce Permanent Fund Dividends paid to Alaskans. Originally, Alaskans were to get $1.4 billion. Walker halved that figure following a legislative session that saw nearly six months of inaction from both chambers in reducing Alaska’s $4 billion deficit.

Wielechowski and two co-plaintiffs, former Alaska Sens. Clem Tillion and Rick Halford, are now crying foul and ignoring the cliff we’re heading for.

Alaska has burned through more than $13 billion in savings in the last few years, and it is now two years from spending those savings entirely. Here’s why you should care, and why Wielechowski should give up the lawsuit:

1. When Alaska’s Constitutional Budget Reserve hits $0 at the end of next fiscal year, the same fund that pays out dividends, the fund’s earnings reserve, will become our new savings account to pay for essential services.

2. When the Permanent Fund earnings reserve hits $0 a few years after that, the Permanent Fund itself becomes our piggy bank. Constitutionally protected or not, it will be targeted.

3. Each Alaskan receiving $1,000 instead of $2,000 this year will be affected far less than if another $700 million is cut from the budget. Imagine your car damaged by pot-holed roads. Imagine your children left ignorant by underfunded schools. Imagine yourself sick in a crowded hospital.

Some who oppose cutting the dividend have referred to Walker’s veto as a regressive tax that will impact poor and rural Alaskans the most. They’re right — but only to a point. This argument ignores the impact of cutting another $700 million to make up the difference, and those impacts will be hardest on poor and rural Alaskans.

Entire state departments could be closed down, their employees laid off, and much of that $700 million gap would still exist. In the process Alaskans could lose resources that allow our state to properly manage fish and game resources, oversee environmental regulations, fund education and pay for Alaska State Troopers and VPSO programs.

We can’t say for sure what will be lost, or how big an impact cuts will have and to whom, until they actually happen. Reducing Dividend checks wasn’t just the smart choice — it was Walker’s only choice to avoid catastrophe.

Walker shouldn’t have had to protect us from ourselves. That was the Legislature’s job, and it has failed. Even after Walker’s veto lawmakers chose not to override the decision, which was possible with a supermajority vote, because they too know the consequences of doing so.

The good news is that the PFD reduction is for one year only, and if the state properly manages the money it has left, perhaps full Dividends can be paid out in future years.

If we steal from tomorrow to pay for today, Alaskans will watch the Dividend disappear. Half of something is better than all of nothing.

Read more Opinion:

My Turn: The Road won’t be a Juneau burden

Alaska Editorial: A solution for the Marine Highway

Despite veto, governor not to blame for state’s fiscal woes

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

A map shows state-by-state results of aggregate polls for U.S. presidential candidates Donald Trump (red) and Kamala Harris (blue), with states too close to call in grey, as of Oct. 29. (Wikimedia Commons map)
Opinion: The silent Republican Party betrayal

On Monday night, Donald Trump reported that two Pennsylvania counties had received… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letters: Vote no on ballot measure 2 for the future of Alaska

The idea that ranked choice voting (RCV) is confusing is a red… Continue reading

(Laurie Craig / Juneau Empire file photo)
10 reasons to put country above party labels in election

Like many of you I grew up during an era when people… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Alaskans are smart, can see the advantages of RCV and open primaries

The League of Women Voters is a nonpartisan organization that neither endorses… Continue reading

Tongass National Forest. (U.S. Forest Service photo)
My Turn: Why I oppose privatization of the Tongass rainforest

Sen. Lisa Murkowski has been trying to privatize the Tongass for years.… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Supporting ranked choice voting is the honest choice

Some folks are really up in arms about the increased freedom afforded… Continue reading

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Election presents stark contrasts

This election, both at the state and federal level, presents a choice… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Praise for Begich overlooks his support of Trump

Tom Boutin’s My Turn column praised Nick Begich. However, he left out… Continue reading

Former Juneau Mayor Bruce Botelho discusses ranked choice voting at a Greater Juneau Chamber of Commerce weekly luncheon on June 30, 2022. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Vote no Ballot Measure 2 and protect open primaries and protect our democracy

The focus of last week’s Juneau World Affairs Forum was the rise… Continue reading

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Begich wants to join the herd of timid followers

On the very top of his campaign website, Nick Begich III claims… Continue reading

In this sample primary ballot released by the state, fictional candidates compete in a primary election. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: An opportunity to vote yes on something – Ballot Measure 2

Every few years, moderate and conservative voters seem to find themselves in… Continue reading