Federal retirement system changes hurt the working class

  • By Jeffrey Smith
  • Thursday, October 26, 2017 7:22am
  • Opinion

My dad is a letter carrier for the U.S. Postal Service, and after 30 years, he is finally approaching retirement. He has laid out plans with a financial advisor that prepare him for retirement in June of 2018. Finally, he’ll earn a reprieve from all the physical aches from the job, the worries about policies affecting his workplace, the frustration from senseless directives from supervisors, and working those extra hours as union steward to defend the rights of his fellow postal carriers, to name a few.

That’s not to say my dad hasn’t loved his career as a mailman. He takes pride in how much his customers love him, how he always puts their checks on top, how he goes the extra mile to carry packages to a secure door, and about how he is likely the slowest carrier in the office due to his meticulousness and attention to detail that keeps the mail in order and his customers happy. He cares about his job, and is passionate about doing it well. But with all the ups, there were plenty of downs that he shared, often after particularly rough days, first at the kitchen table, and now, across thousands of miles over Facetime. But, no matter! The end is near, right?

Wrong, I fear, if we let lawmakers continue on the path they are on. The budget proposed by the president and currently being considered by Congress would upend my dad’s retirement plans and thousands of other federal employees approaching retirement.

The budget of the Trump administration, recently passed by the Senate, calls for some significant changes to the Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS). These changes will directly impact middle class federal employees, one of the most significant being the end to subsidies for FERS employees that retire before age 62 (when retirees can begin to collect social security). Put plainly, this change will force my dad and others in his position to delay retirement plans for another two years because they will not be able to collect a portion of the funds they had been promised. So much for all those meetings with the financial advisor! For years, my dad and other retirees have had their date circled on the calendar; the date they had been waiting for, after so many years of hard work and sacrifice. In haste, the president and Republican lawmakers can undo all those plans.

Notably, these cuts and other changes to FERS follow shortly after the announcement of a proposed tax policy that appears to cater to the wealthy rather than the working class. Proposing tax reform that does not correct for the well-documented explosion in wealth for the upper class over the last 30 years is bad enough, but to combine that now with a change in employee retirement policy that directly impacts so many middle-class workers and retirees is beyond unjust; it’s monstrous. Amazing, a significant portion of the country will defend these actions in the name of “fiscal responsibility” and “lean government,” while in the backdrop, thousands of hard-working people like my dad will be scrambling to adjust, with their hopes to retire within the year crushed while being forced into futures they did not envision, nor deserve.

One cannot even truly quantify the immense value of these retirement years that are at stake here, knowing all too well that life is unpredictable, and no one can completely plan for the future (in regard to health and well-being). I am no expert on FERS, but surely there is a more sensible path. Some may have justifiable arguments regarding some necessary changes that ought to be made. But, any sensible and decent person would enact changes gradually, rather than pulling the rug out from under those who have imminent plans to retire that have been years in the making.

My dad worked hard. My dad did his job. He put in his time, and planned for his future. Let us demand that our representatives respect that future, or let us remember when they ask us to vote on theirs.


• Jeffrey Smith of Juneau is a certified teacher whose studies focused on political science. He is the son of a federal employee who will be negatively impacted by proposed changes to the Federal Employee Retirement System.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

After Hurricane Katrina in 2005, many Louisiana homes were rebuilt with the living space on the second story, with garage space below, to try to protect the home from future flooding. (Infrogmation of New Orleans via Wikimedia, CC BY-SA)
Misperceptions stand in way of disaster survivors wanting to rebuild safer, more sustainable homes

As Florida and the Southeast begin recovering from 2024’s destructive hurricanes, many… Continue reading

The F/V Liberty, captained by Trenton Clark, fishes the Pacific near Metlakatla on Aug. 20, 2024. (Ash Adams/The New York Times)
My Turn: Charting a course toward seafood independence for Alaska’s vulnerable food systems

As a commercial fisherman based in Sitka and the executive director of… Continue reading

People watch a broadcast of Former President Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, delivering a speech at Times Square in New York, on Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2024. (Graham Dickie/The New York Times)
Opinion: The Democratic Party’s failure of imagination

Aside from not being a lifelong Republican like Peter Wehner, the sentiment… Continue reading

A steady procession of vehicles and students arrives at Juneau-Douglas High School: Yadaa.at Kalé before the start of the new school year on Thursday, Aug. 15, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Let’s consider tightening cell phones restrictions in Juneau schools

A recent uptick in student fights on and off campus has Juneau… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Alaskans are smart, can see the advantages of RCV and open primaries

The League of Women Voters is a nonpartisan organization that neither endorses… Continue reading

(Laurie Craig / Juneau Empire file photo)
10 reasons to put country above party labels in election

Like many of you I grew up during an era when people… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letters: Vote no on ballot measure 2 for the future of Alaska

The idea that ranked choice voting (RCV) is confusing is a red… Continue reading

A map shows state-by-state results of aggregate polls for U.S. presidential candidates Donald Trump (red) and Kamala Harris (blue), with states too close to call in grey, as of Oct. 29. (Wikimedia Commons map)
Opinion: The silent Republican Party betrayal

On Monday night, Donald Trump reported that two Pennsylvania counties had received… Continue reading

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Election presents stark contrasts

This election, both at the state and federal level, presents a choice… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Supporting ranked choice voting is the honest choice

Some folks are really up in arms about the increased freedom afforded… Continue reading

Tongass National Forest. (U.S. Forest Service photo)
My Turn: Why I oppose privatization of the Tongass rainforest

Sen. Lisa Murkowski has been trying to privatize the Tongass for years.… Continue reading