Health care bill threatens Alaskans

  • By Terry Snyder
  • Monday, May 29, 2017 8:52am
  • Opinion

Sometimes legislation in Congress has unintended consequences. This is one of those times. The American Health Care Act (AHCA) that recently passed in the U.S. House, and awaits action in the Senate, would increase costs and risks for Alaskans including seniors, children and adults with disabilities, people with pre-existing conditions and those ages 50-64.

The AHCA would ax federal funding for Medicaid which supports health programs for vulnerable Alaskans. Such a huge loss of funds, in total $834 billion nationwide, would blow a giant hole in Alaska’s state budget, shifting more costs onto the state and ultimately families.

It would also put our most vulnerable citizens — seniors with low incomes and children and adults with disabilities — at great risk of losing the vital health care coverage and long-term services and support that they desperately count on. In 2017, more than 181,000 Alaskans received health coverage and long-term services and supports (LTSS) through Medicaid.

An immediate threat would be to seniors and Alaskans with disabilities who rely on cost-efficient services to remain at home, where they want to be. Cutting federal Medicaid jeopardizes access to home and community-based services which forces people to rely on more expensive nursing home care.

Another hit for Alaskan seniors: the AHCA weakens the long-term solvency of Medicare — something that is of grave concern to Alaska’s 78,892 Medicare beneficiaries and tens of thousands more (143,100 Alaskans who are 50-64 years old) who are nearing eligibility age. Undermining Medicare’s ability to pay for services in the future opens the door to more radical changes, like a voucher program that would shift more costs and risk to older Alaskans who would have to try to find affordable coverage on the private insurance market. We need to be doing more to shore up Medicare, not less.

In addition to all of this, the AHCA would slap an age tax on the thousands of Alaskans between the ages of 50 and 64 who buy insurance on the individual market. The bill would let insurance companies charge older people five times — or more — what other people pay for the exact same policies. Coupled with the AHCA’s reduced tax credits for older Alaskans, these changes could cause their premiums to skyrocket. The AARP Public Policy Institute has crunched the numbers. A 55-year old Alaskan earning $25,000 a year could pay up to $18,533 more for health coverage under the AHCA. And, a 64-year-old Alaskan with the same income could be looking at increases that would eat up more than 80 percent of their income — $28,210. How is this an improvement? The point of health care reform is to lower costs, not raise them.

To make matters even worse, under the AHCA Alaskans with pre-existing conditions — and more than 50,000 Alaskans have a pre-existing condition — would be at risk. The bill undermines protections that stop insurance companies from denying coverage or charging outrageous premiums for people with conditions including heart disease, cancer and diabetes. The 11th-hour deal adding money to a high-risk pool fund isn’t nearly enough to keep premiums at a reasonable level.

All of this adds up to one clear conclusion. The AHCA is not the change that improves the quality of life for Alaskans. It means higher prices and less coverage and the Senate should not support this high-cost, high-risk bill.

AARP Alaska, on behalf of its more than 86,000 members in Alaska urges Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Sen. Dan Sullivan to stand up for Alaskans and oppose the AHCA.


• Terry Snyder is the AARP Alaska State President (volunteer) and resides in Palmer.


 

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

A map shows state-by-state results of aggregate polls for U.S. presidential candidates Donald Trump (red) and Kamala Harris (blue), with states too close to call in grey, as of Oct. 29. (Wikimedia Commons map)
Opinion: The silent Republican Party betrayal

On Monday night, Donald Trump reported that two Pennsylvania counties had received… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letters: Vote no on ballot measure 2 for the future of Alaska

The idea that ranked choice voting (RCV) is confusing is a red… Continue reading

(Laurie Craig / Juneau Empire file photo)
10 reasons to put country above party labels in election

Like many of you I grew up during an era when people… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Alaskans are smart, can see the advantages of RCV and open primaries

The League of Women Voters is a nonpartisan organization that neither endorses… Continue reading

Tongass National Forest. (U.S. Forest Service photo)
My Turn: Why I oppose privatization of the Tongass rainforest

Sen. Lisa Murkowski has been trying to privatize the Tongass for years.… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Supporting ranked choice voting is the honest choice

Some folks are really up in arms about the increased freedom afforded… Continue reading

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Election presents stark contrasts

This election, both at the state and federal level, presents a choice… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Praise for Begich overlooks his support of Trump

Tom Boutin’s My Turn column praised Nick Begich. However, he left out… Continue reading

Most Read