An illustration shows the location of a proposed new City Hall in Juneau. (City and Borough of Juneau)

An illustration shows the location of a proposed new City Hall in Juneau. (City and Borough of Juneau)

My Turn: Lack of independent cost assessment of new City Hall means ballot question is not timely

The City and Borough of Juneau election this Oct. 3 (voting starts by mail Sept. 17) will include a proposed bond issue for $27 million to partially fund a new City Hall. This same project was on the local ballot last year for $37 million and was rejected by the voters.

This year the city manager and Assembly have reduced the bond amount $10 million by assigning $16.3 million cash to the project this budget year. This has reduced the requested bond amount from last year by $10 million, but increased the total project cost by $2 million ($43.3 million compared to last year’s estimate of $41.3 million).

The CBJ planning process ubiquitously employs the use of “plans” – comprehensive plan, area plans, port plans, etc. In particular, the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) lists the priority capital projects the Assembly has established following thorough public discussion. The final CIP list for 2024 includes, in part: schools, parks, waste management, streets, harbors, police station, transportation, hospital, water, wastewater, airport, fire control and deferred maintenance – totaling $102 million (CBJ estimate). But missing from this capital plan is any mention of a new City Hall. Apparently, a new City Hall is a not a higher priority than anything prioritized in the CIP, yet its cost already exceeds 40% of all planned city priorities combined.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

On July 12 we requested the cost comparison information for this project, but none has yet been forthcoming. The reason given is this information is being “compiled.” As of Aug. 14, CBJ estimated delivery within the week, yet none has been forthcoming as of Aug. 22. When and if these materials are made available, so much the better, but why wait so long? Interesting, that information, which already exists and was used to make this decision, cannot be shared because it is being “compiled.”

General reasons given by CBJ for a new City Hall are:

(1) Some rental costs will be avoided. (If so, will ownership costs be less?)

(2) Maintenance costs of a new building will be less due to use of durable construction materials – if so, the current City Hall is made of concrete – is concrete not durable?

(3) The voters didn’t have enough information last year, so the city has budgeted $50,000 for a campaign to convince on the proposed $27 million bond ($43.3 million total cost and climbing).

However, our request for that information has gone unanswered for four weeks pending “compilation.”

Until CBJ cost information can be independently verified, the new City Hall proposal is not timely. The pro-forma financials used by the CBJ to justify the decision to promote a new City Hall should be independently corroborated and verified prior to voter consideration of the suggested bond issue. How else can do we know a new City Hall is a wise choice?

A total of $16.3 million in cash has already been budgeted this year. That, plus $27 million in bonds should be rigorously analyzed and verified independently before obligating the taxpayer to 20 years of bond payments while other priorities go unfunded. It is only prudent to consider our municipal capital needs for the next 20 years prior to bonding for a new City Hall. You – the property taxpayer – will be on the hook for that bond.

Our Juneau cost of living is the highest in urban Alaska. A major portion of that cost is taxation. Nice things are nice, but how can we reduce the cost of living while having facilities that are “good enough?” Voters deserve a detailed and verified analysis of costs prior to obligating our property taxes for the next 20 years (maybe 30) as our population ages and shrinks. Young people are leaving this community due to the high cost of living. Surely there are ways to reduce our cost of living while maintaining reasonable and functional facilities. The CBJ administration and Assembly have not yet made this demonstration.

• Frank Bergstrom is a Juneau resident with 43 years of experience in permitting, construction, operation, closure, and environmental compliance of underground and surface mines. He has participated in hundreds of public meetings and hearings regarding development projects, and also served on mayor’s AJ Mine Task Force and Juneau Affordable Housing Commission.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

President Joe Biden and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine depart after a joint news conference during the annual Group of 7 summit, in Savelletri, Italy, June 13, 2024. (Erin Schaff/The New York Times)
Opinion: Supporting Ukraine should have started with defending democracy at home

President Donald Trump just issued a new challenge to congressional Republicans who… Continue reading

Ephraim Froelich, a Juneau resident, testifies in support of House Bill 69 on Jan. 29, 2025. His son, who attends first grade in the Juneau School District, sits beside him. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Alaskans need to choose between unchecked school funding or improved student achievement

The calls for boosting education funding by increasing Alaska’s Base Student Allocation… Continue reading

Eric Antrim inspecting bridges near Kake in 2023. (Courtesy photo)
My Turn: In response to the mass firings of Forest Service and other federal workers

I am Eric Antrim, a proud member and the elected Recording Secretary… Continue reading

Jane Hale smiles for a photo as the wind blows a newly raised LGBTQ+ flag at the Hurff A. Saunders Federal Building downtown in June of 2023. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Juneau’s transgender community and the church

I think of religion the way I think of marriage: a great… Continue reading

The Constitution of Alaska on display in the Seattle University School of Law library in January 2023. (Creative Commons photo)
My Turn: Actions in D.C. means Alaskans need to demand rights in state’s Constitution

The Constitution of Alaska is a masterpiece of careful thought and straightforward… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: An education lession for Begich

Rep. Begich has no public opinion on the dismantling of the Department… Continue reading

U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Jan. 24, 2025. (Tom Brenner/The New York Times)
Opinion: The mirror’s reflection Trump and Vance can’t see

While speaking with reporters on Tuesday after a meeting with the King… Continue reading

Most Read