My Turn: The bogus use of the word “divisive”

  • By WIN GRUENING
  • Friday, September 2, 2016 1:03am
  • Opinion

The English language is a wonderful and versatile method of communication. It can be used to condemn, honor and ridicule — perhaps all in the same sentence. It has been described as a “mongrel tongue” — having been influenced and formed by so many other languages, cultures and events.

I am no language expert — not by a long shot — but I have picked up one thing about our language and our culture: Even one word can be used to subliminally convey an idea or thought without ever actually stating it and by virtue of its power try to create an unassailable truth.

And while its original definition may not have changed much, its overuse can turn it into a code word that means something different but which everyone clearly understands.

“Divisive” is just such a word. Even its pronunciation is divisive. Should I pronounce it “di-VY-siv” or should I pronounce it “di-VIS-siv”? (Hint: the former pronunciation is preferred).

It is used routinely in politics today to squelch debate and shut down legitimate criticism of policies or actions. Its misuse is a favorite ploy of some since the term almost always defies refutation.

Consider the Merriam-Webster definition of the word “divisive”: “causing a lot of disagreement between people and causing them to separate into different groups.”

On the surface, this would seem to describe many issues — even those brought up routinely at City and Borough of Juneau Assembly meetings where people express different opinions.

But I think the operative word in the dictionary definition is “causing.” People disagree all the time. The mere fact of their disagreement doesn’t make the issue divisive — it already is. People tend to divide along political and cultural lines naturally according to their background and experience. Why is this “bad”?

Debate and disagreement are healthy. How else can we be exposed to different opinions and viewpoints? If every time someone disagreed with the person he was talking to and the “divisive” card was pulled out, our productive conversations would effectively end.

In America, we are allowed to express our opinions without fear of government retribution — but if we want to be taken seriously we must support our opinions with facts and rational arguments. Arguing that someone is divisive does not make them so, nor does it make your case.

So the next time people tell you that you are being “divisive” because you dare to disagree, look them in the eye and ask why. Chances are they won’t be able to answer.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Win Gruening. (Courtesy photo)
Opinion: Ten years and counting with the Juneau Empire…

In 2014, two years after I retired from a 32-year banking career,… Continue reading

U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, addresses a crowd with President-elect Donald Trump present. (Photo from U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan’s office)
Opinion: Sen. Sullivan’s Orwellian style of transparency

When I read that President-elect Donald Trump had filed a lawsuit against… Continue reading

Sunrise over Prince of Wales Island in the Craig Ranger District of the Tongass National Forest. (Forest Service photo by Brian Barr)
Southeast Alaska’s ecosystem is speaking. Here’s how to listen.

Have you ever stepped into an old-growth forest alive with ancient trees… Continue reading

As a protester waves a sign in the background, Daniel Penny, center, accused of criminally negligent homicide in the chokehold death of Jordan Neely, arrives at State Supreme Court in Manhattan on Monday, Dec. 9, 2024. A New York jury acquitted Daniel Penny in the death of Jordan Neely and as Republican politicians hailed the verdict, some New Yorkers found it deeply disturbing.(Jefferson Siegel/The New York Times)
Opinion: Stress testing the justice system

On Monday, a New York City jury found Daniel Penny not guilty… Continue reading

Members of the Juneau-Douglas High School: Yadaa.at Kalé hockey team help Mendenhall Valley residents affected by the record Aug. 6 flood fill more than 3,000 sandbags in October. (JHDS Hockey photo)
Opinion: What does it mean to be part of a community?

“The greatness of a community is most accurately measured by the compassionate… Continue reading

Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for defense secretary, at the Capitol in Washington on Monday, Dec. 2, 2024. Accusations of past misconduct have threatened his nomination from the start and Trump is weighing his options, even as Pete Hegseth meets with senators to muster support. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Opinion: Sullivan plays make believe with America’s future

Two weeks ago, Sen. Dan Sullivan said Pete Hegseth was a “strong”… Continue reading

Dan Allard (right), a flood fighting expert for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, explains how Hesco barriers function at a table where miniature replicas of the three-foot square and four-foot high barriers are displayed during an open house Nov. 14 at Thunder Mountain Middle School to discuss flood prevention options in Juneau. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Our comfort with spectacle became a crisis

If I owned a home in the valley that was damaged by… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Voter fact left out of news

With all the post-election analysis, one fact has escaped much publicity. When… Continue reading

The site of the now-closed Tulsequah Chief mine. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Maybe the news is ‘No new news’ on Canada’s plans for Tulsequah Chief mine cleanup

In 2015, the British Columbia government committed to ending Tulsequah Chief’s pollution… Continue reading