Opinion: As a seafood processor, I’m voting No on Stand for Salmon

Opinion: As a seafood processor, I’m voting No on Stand for Salmon

  • By Kevin Gullufsen Juneau Empire
  • Tuesday, September 25, 2018 9:34pm
  • OpinionOpinion

Sometimes, to understand where you’re going, you have to look back and see where you’ve been. The older I get, the more I use history to help me make better decisions for tomorrow. Today, I look at my cannery, Alaska Seafood Company; I look at Auke Bay; and I look at all that we have built in Juneau since I arrived 45 years ago. And let me tell you: most of this would not have been possible under Ballot Measure 1, the cleverly named yet misleading “Stand for Salmon” measure.

Alaska Seafood Company sits today where the old Juneau Ready Mix was. This area was a flood zone near a river — not ideal for building. Years ago, when we acquired this property, we were able to make substantial improvements that allowed us to build our operation.

Under Ballot Measure 1, you’re basically not allowed to change anything — water or land — that could cause harm to areas that could be fish habitat. That makes it pretty clear to me that had Ballot Measure 1 been in place years ago, Alaska Seafood Company would not call 5731 Concrete Way home.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

But besides my small business, there is a lot of amazing infrastructure and commerce that wouldn’t be in place today under the fish habitat measure: Fred Meyer, Costco, the Egan drive over the wetlands, the airport expansion, the police station, many of our fire stations and the ferry parking lot, just to name a few.

What I’m trying to get across here is that Ballot Measure 1 is not about environmental protections. To make proposals that can enrich the environment has validity. This proposal doesn’t do that. Instead of making thoughtful improvements to existing fish habitat protections, this measure starts from ground zero and implements enough regulations to send Alaska back to the Stone Age. The people who wrote this clearly don’t know anything about the protections we already have in place.

Frankly, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game has been doing a pretty good job with habitat management. Just because our policies are old, doesn’t make them bad. How about the house you live in? I bet it has gotten old too. Look at all the beautiful historical homes in Juneau. We don’t tear them down. We upgrade them over time. And that’s what we’ve been doing since statehood with our fish management policies.

I know that’s a hard pill to swallow as we look to the low king returns this year. Yes, there are a lot of closures, and that’s part of the management system. We can’t control what happens out in the ocean, but we do what we can here in state waters and land. Everybody is taking a hit on this thing equally and it stinks. But if we let an arbitrary group of Outsiders come in, who know little about the way we manage our fish and game, we stand to lose much more.

Many fish processors go through extensive permitting with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game so that they can discharge guts and gills into the bay. Not a big deal. The crabs like that. So it’s no surprise that earlier this year, Pacific Seafood Processors Association stated their opposition to the measure. Yet the proponents of Ballot Measure 1 argue that this is a good decision for our fishing industry. If this measure was actually designed to increase our fish returns, don’t you think the processors would be for it?

If there were an easy solution we could do here, on land, we would have already done it. Ballot Measure 1 isn’t presenting any ideas that are going to return salmon to the rivers. Ballot Measure 1 is just a bad idea, written by people trying to oversimplify a very complicated issue.

All you have to do is look back at the past 60-plus years to see how a future with Ballot Measure 1 isn’t possible. This isn’t a left or a right argument. It’s not a developers’ argument. This is just a decision we have to make for our communities.

For my community, here in Juneau, I know the right decision. I’m voting ‘No’ on Ballot Measure 1.


• Dick Hand lives in Juneau and is the owner of Alaska Seafood Company. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Elon Musk on stage with a chainsaw gifted to him by President Javier Milei of Argentina, left, during the 2025 Conservative Political Action Conference at the Gaylord National Resort and Conference Center in National Harbor, Md., on Thursday, Feb. 20, 2025. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
My Turn: The DOGE debacle

I guess I’m lucky: Only two of my friends have been fired… Continue reading

U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski delivers her annual address to the Alaska Legislature on March 18, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The silence betraying America

“How we came to a place where we are fighting now with… Continue reading

This rendering depicts Huna Totem Corp.’s proposed new cruise ship dock downtown now being considered by the Juneau Assembly. (City and Borough of Juneau)
Opinion: Approval of new cruise dock moves forward

Aak’w Landing, the long-proposed cruise dock development in downtown Juneau is one… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Getting federal flood help is not waste or fraud

Has Trump, Elon Musk, or any of the DOGE boys ever seen… Continue reading

Jonathan Swinton, executive director of Gastineau Human Services, presides over a ribbon-cutting ceremony for the opening of a remodeled behavioral health clinic at the nonprofit organization’s Lemon Creek campus on Thursday, Oct. 24, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Three affordable housing solutions for Juneau

Homelessness and affordable housing continue to plague far too many in our… Continue reading

The U.S. Capitol in Washington on Wednesday, March 12, 2025. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
My Turn: Important questions for Dan Sullivan and Nick Begich

Dan Sullivan and Nick Begich, what are you going to do to… Continue reading

The Mendenhall Glacier Visitor Center on Feb. 22, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Volunteer for the right cause

Recently I was asked by a friend to volunteer at the Mendenhall… Continue reading

Sen. Dan Sullivan, (R-Alaska) questions Lee Zeldin, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to run the Environmental Protection Agency, during the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works confirmation hearing, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Opinion: Trickle-down lawlessness

Last weekend, I signed a petition calling on Sen. Dan Sullivan to… Continue reading

Most Read