Opinion: Ballot initiative is based on hate and greed

Opinion: Ballot initiative is based on hate and greed

This is far from the first time such a destructive tax change has been proposed.

  • Murray R. Walsh
  • Tuesday, September 1, 2020 9:41am
  • Opinion

By Murray R. Walsh

I have been watching the initiative process in Alaska for 44 years. Each and every one of them has been based on hate or greed. Prop 1, on the ballot this coming Nov. 3, is based on both. This is the proposal to increase the tax burden on the major oil operators in Alaska. Alaska already has a high tax on produced oil, nearly the highest in the world.

Prop 1’s sponsors are from two camps: Political operators who want the state to have more money to spend and do not believe the golden goose will be overly bothered (the greed side); and, enviro-climate activists who want to terminate the fossil fuel industry (the hate side.) The reality that the long-term interests of either group conflict with the interests of the other doesn’t seem to bother these strange bedfellows. The greed side thinks that the industry will just suck it up and keep on going as before. This is not true.

This is far from the first time such a destructive tax change has been proposed. The previous attempt, another initiative-based tax increase, flamed out in the 2014 election but had its roots in an earlier oil tax increase that was actually passed into law in the 2007 session of the Alaska Legislature called ACES. Who were the actors? Why none other than then-Gov. Sarah Palin in partnership with then House Minority Leader Rep. Beth Kertulla. Both bragged about “working across the aisle” to get it done. (Strange bedfellows indeed.)

The result? Upon passage of ACES, not one more nickel of petroleum exploration money was approved by the industry on the North Slope. Exploration projects that were already funded and underway went ahead, but nothing new was initiated. The exploration effort was all but ended by the time Sean Parnell became governor upon Palin’s abdication in mid-2009. It took Parnell a couple of years to set things right with Senate Bill 21 and exploration resumed and continues to this day with lots of good results and new oil headed for TAPS.

We have to remember that Alaska competes with other oil-bearing regions of the world and oil companies have choices about where they invest. Alaska has some attractions that other places do not, but the most repellent aspects of our treatment of the industry has been tax instability and disrespect. Instability from the greedy and disrespect from the haters.

I am not saying that we have to do whatever the oil industry wants. There have been legitimate beefs with the industry — usually tax accounting disagreements — that had to be sorted out, sometimes in court. But, occasional bad behavior on their part does not justify massive bad behavior on our part. I am saying that Alaska has to be in a responsible partnership with oil. The two essential ingredients of such a partnership are stability and respect.

The sponsors of Prop 1 don’t want us to have partnership with the oil industry. They want us to be at war where greed and hate have made their nest.

I am also not saying that we as a society have to be committed to fossil-powered energy indefinitely. There is a good trend, nationwide, to battery-based cars and now small trucks and also a trend toward generating electricity by non-fossil means. The transition is happening. Going to war with the fossil energy industry will only slow it down and surely will not speed it up.

The most significant change in modern society — from an air pollution standpoint — was the transition to unleaded gasoline. It happened without riots, mass upheaval or demonstrations. Society agreed on the need and got it done. Climate change activists should take a lesson from that experience. There don’t have to be losers in order for there to be winners.

Please join me in voting no on Prop 1.

• Murray R. Walsh is self-employed and has been an observer and participant in Alaska politics and economics since 1976. He lives in Juneau. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

After Hurricane Katrina in 2005, many Louisiana homes were rebuilt with the living space on the second story, with garage space below, to try to protect the home from future flooding. (Infrogmation of New Orleans via Wikimedia, CC BY-SA)
Misperceptions stand in way of disaster survivors wanting to rebuild safer, more sustainable homes

As Florida and the Southeast begin recovering from 2024’s destructive hurricanes, many… Continue reading

The F/V Liberty, captained by Trenton Clark, fishes the Pacific near Metlakatla on Aug. 20, 2024. (Ash Adams/The New York Times)
My Turn: Charting a course toward seafood independence for Alaska’s vulnerable food systems

As a commercial fisherman based in Sitka and the executive director of… Continue reading

People watch a broadcast of Former President Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, delivering a speech at Times Square in New York, on Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2024. (Graham Dickie/The New York Times)
Opinion: The Democratic Party’s failure of imagination

Aside from not being a lifelong Republican like Peter Wehner, the sentiment… Continue reading

A steady procession of vehicles and students arrives at Juneau-Douglas High School: Yadaa.at Kalé before the start of the new school year on Thursday, Aug. 15, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Let’s consider tightening cell phones restrictions in Juneau schools

A recent uptick in student fights on and off campus has Juneau… Continue reading

A map shows state-by-state results of aggregate polls for U.S. presidential candidates Donald Trump (red) and Kamala Harris (blue), with states too close to call in grey, as of Oct. 29. (Wikimedia Commons map)
Opinion: The silent Republican Party betrayal

On Monday night, Donald Trump reported that two Pennsylvania counties had received… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letters: Vote no on ballot measure 2 for the future of Alaska

The idea that ranked choice voting (RCV) is confusing is a red… Continue reading

(Laurie Craig / Juneau Empire file photo)
10 reasons to put country above party labels in election

Like many of you I grew up during an era when people… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Alaskans are smart, can see the advantages of RCV and open primaries

The League of Women Voters is a nonpartisan organization that neither endorses… Continue reading

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Election presents stark contrasts

This election, both at the state and federal level, presents a choice… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Supporting ranked choice voting is the honest choice

Some folks are really up in arms about the increased freedom afforded… Continue reading

Tongass National Forest. (U.S. Forest Service photo)
My Turn: Why I oppose privatization of the Tongass rainforest

Sen. Lisa Murkowski has been trying to privatize the Tongass for years.… Continue reading