Opinion: Ballot Measure 1 would be deleterious to Alaska’s future

Opinion: Ballot Measure 1 would be deleterious to Alaska’s future

A yes vote on Ballot Measure 1 would be like driving a ship into the eye of a storm.

  • By Barbara Haney
  • Tuesday, July 21, 2020 12:44pm
  • Opinion

Like many sectors of the economy, the oil industry has been hit hard by the pandemic. Stay at home orders that greatly reduced demand for fuel, production wars between Saudi Arabia and Russia that greatly increased the global supply of oil drove the price down to historically low levels. The industry has struggled nationally, and Alaska’s industry has been no exception. Alaska’s oil industry has one of the highest cost structures in the world, and some firms are struggling to make royalty payments.

Oil revenue is the lifeblood of Alaska’s economy. Nearly one-third of all employment in Alaska is directly tied to the oil industry. The majority of Alaska’s state revenue is derived from the oil industry, and public employment is also a large component of the Alaska economy.

Raising taxes on Alaska’s oil industry at the present time would be deleterious to Alaska’s economy- it would be like kicking a person when they are down. An increase in the tax would lead to declines in production, employment, and investment. Not only would this hurt current oil production and state revenue, and it would have an adverse impact on future revenue through disinvestment and future production cuts.

To put it in terms that a Coast Guard engineer like Rich Moniak (of a previous editorial) might understand, a yes vote on Ballot Measure 1 would be like driving a ship into the eye of a storm. At first it would seem peaceful;, but the back side of the storm soon hits with a new set of dangers that are often worse than the beginning of the storm. Voting no on Ballot Measure 1 would be more like staying at the edge of the storm; the ride will be rough but navigable.

Whether Ballot Measure 1 passes taxes, there will be decreases in public services — so the question becomes do we want to destroy Alaska’s future economy by stifling its lifeblood through raising taxes or sit tight, be fiscally conservative, and weather the storm. If we sit tight, be fiscally conservative and vote no on Ballot Measure 1, we can at least preserve the private sector and have some hope of a future economic recovery. A yes vote will have an adverse impact on oil production, industry investment, state revenue, creating damaging impacts on employment in multiple economic sectors and state revenue now and in the future. Please, vote no on Ballot measure 1.

Barbara Haney, Ph.D., is a North Pole resident. Haney received her Ph.D. in public finance from the University of Notre Dame and previously taught economics at several institutions including the University of Alaska Fairbanks. She is currently a legislative aide to Rep. Mike Prax. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

After Hurricane Katrina in 2005, many Louisiana homes were rebuilt with the living space on the second story, with garage space below, to try to protect the home from future flooding. (Infrogmation of New Orleans via Wikimedia, CC BY-SA)
Misperceptions stand in way of disaster survivors wanting to rebuild safer, more sustainable homes

As Florida and the Southeast begin recovering from 2024’s destructive hurricanes, many… Continue reading

The F/V Liberty, captained by Trenton Clark, fishes the Pacific near Metlakatla on Aug. 20, 2024. (Ash Adams/The New York Times)
My Turn: Charting a course toward seafood independence for Alaska’s vulnerable food systems

As a commercial fisherman based in Sitka and the executive director of… Continue reading

People watch a broadcast of Former President Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, delivering a speech at Times Square in New York, on Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2024. (Graham Dickie/The New York Times)
Opinion: The Democratic Party’s failure of imagination

Aside from not being a lifelong Republican like Peter Wehner, the sentiment… Continue reading

A steady procession of vehicles and students arrives at Juneau-Douglas High School: Yadaa.at Kalé before the start of the new school year on Thursday, Aug. 15, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Let’s consider tightening cell phones restrictions in Juneau schools

A recent uptick in student fights on and off campus has Juneau… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Alaskans are smart, can see the advantages of RCV and open primaries

The League of Women Voters is a nonpartisan organization that neither endorses… Continue reading

(Laurie Craig / Juneau Empire file photo)
10 reasons to put country above party labels in election

Like many of you I grew up during an era when people… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letters: Vote no on ballot measure 2 for the future of Alaska

The idea that ranked choice voting (RCV) is confusing is a red… Continue reading

A map shows state-by-state results of aggregate polls for U.S. presidential candidates Donald Trump (red) and Kamala Harris (blue), with states too close to call in grey, as of Oct. 29. (Wikimedia Commons map)
Opinion: The silent Republican Party betrayal

On Monday night, Donald Trump reported that two Pennsylvania counties had received… Continue reading

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Election presents stark contrasts

This election, both at the state and federal level, presents a choice… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Supporting ranked choice voting is the honest choice

Some folks are really up in arms about the increased freedom afforded… Continue reading

Tongass National Forest. (U.S. Forest Service photo)
My Turn: Why I oppose privatization of the Tongass rainforest

Sen. Lisa Murkowski has been trying to privatize the Tongass for years.… Continue reading