In this Feb. 27, 2019 photo, U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Hanoi. (Evan Vucci | Associated Press File)

In this Feb. 27, 2019 photo, U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Hanoi. (Evan Vucci | Associated Press File)

Opinion: ‘Peace through strength’ is Orwellian call to arms

What does the history and future of nuclear weapons proliferation mean for Alaskans?

  • By Shelby Surdyk
  • Tuesday, March 5, 2019 9:32am
  • Opinion

Eleven years ago, Lijon Eknilang came to Juneau to speak at the World Nuclear Awareness Conference, hosted at the University of Alaska Southeast. A survivor of the U.S. Nuclear Testing Program (NTP) in the Marshall Islands and a victim of the secret human radiation experiment called Project 4.1, Lijon dedicated her life raising awareness about the human and environmental costs of nuclear weapons testing and development.

Today is her birthday, March 1. In honor of Lijon, who passed away in 2012, I would like to take a moment to reflect on the history and future of nuclear weapons proliferation — and ask, what does this mean for Alaskans?

March 1, 2019, is also the 65th anniversary of Castle Bravo — the largest atmospheric thermonuclear test ever conducted by the United States. At 15 megatons, Castle Bravo was 1,000 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

After Castle Bravo, the U.S. thought that it had won the global arms race.

It had not.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Less than a decade after Castle Bravo, the Soviet Union responded with an even larger test: Tsar Bomba.

The Soviet test had a blast radius of 58 megatons, nearly 4,000 times larger than Hiroshima, and the shockwave broke windowpanes 560 miles away.

Tsar Bomba shook the planet and woke the world to the madness of the arms race. Within two years of test, the U.S. and the Soviet Union, along with 120 other countries, had signed the Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT) — banning nuclear tests in the atmosphere, underwater, or outer space.

After the PTBT came into force, atmospheric testing stopped, but global stockpiles continued to grow. By 1986, more than 70,000 nuclear warheads were stockpiled worldwide.

The pattern of proliferation changed in 1987, when U.S. President Ronald Reagan and Soviet Prime Minister Mikhail Gorbachev signed the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. That bilateral agreement, signed at the height of the Cold War, eliminated an entire class of nuclear weapons, and restricted the stockpiles of both countries. It marked a turning point in the arms race. Some say it saved the world.

Since the INF Treaty was signed, global stockpiles have steadily decreased. Today, the number of nuclear warheads worldwide stands at 14,000; an 80 percent reduction since with INF Treaty was signed.

But on Feb. 1, 2019, the INF treaty expired when President Donald Trump formally withdrew the U.S. from the agreement.

In an opinion piece published in the Juneau Empire last month, James Jay Carafano argued that America needed “peace through strength,” and so should disregard arms control agreements (such as the INF Treaty) that put limits on the growth of the U.S. nuclear arsenal.

Peace through strength? I have never heard such an Orwellian call to arms.

As a lifelong Alaskan who has spent the last 15-years studying the history of nuclear weapons development and policy, I disagree that nuclear proliferation can bring peace. The dissolution of the INF Treaty signals the start of a 21st century nuclear arms race. If the race escalates into full-scale confrontation (whether due to accident or aggression), Alaska’s proximity to nuclear armed states could make it the closest target. The end of the INF treaty could also invite a new era of nuclear weapons testing. In the 1960s and ‘70s, nuclear testing directly impacted Alaska when underground tests were carried out on the island of Amchitka. Alaska was also impacted indirectly by nuclear testing; radiocesium from global atmospheric fallout remains concentrated in Arctic foodwebs, threatening human-ecological health.

I do agree with Carafano that the world needs “peace through strength” — but a different kind of strength. It needs the kind of strength that people like Lijon embodied. A fearlessness in the face of power. It needs the kind of strength shown by the community members of Point Hope when they stopped the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission from detonating five thermonuclear explosions on the North Slope as part of Project Chariot. It needs the determination and commitment from a group of people who believe that another future, one without nuclear weapons, is possible.

The world needs that kind of strength again today. The world needs it now.


• Shelby Surdyk is an activist and organizer from Skagway. She’s working with Veterans for Peace to organize a youth congress for the global elimination of nuclear weapons, to be held in Juneau in the Spring of 2020.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

President Donald Trump during a Cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, on Thursday, April 10, 2025. The administration says foreign governments are racing to the United States to negotiate, but exactly which countries might strike a deal — and over what — remains unclear. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
Opinion: Final Draft – Cheerleading the dumbest trade war ever

In 2018, Sen. Dan Sullivan co-sponsored the STOP Act that he said… Continue reading

U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan addresses a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature in the House Chambers on Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2023. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Sen. Sullivan’s latest blabber — ‘Liberal Judges’

Two bedrock American values — equality under the law and fair elections… Continue reading

Elon Musk boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, on Friday, March 21, 2025. Musk was traveling with President Donald Trump to Bedminster, N.J. The world’s richest man made inaccurate claims about entitlement fraud, how a government payment system works and government survey costs. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
My Turn: Is it time to impeach Elon Musk?

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States,… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Sen. Sullivan should have a voice, not just nod along with Trump

I echo the concerns expressed by Diane DeSloover in her letter in… Continue reading

Multiple vehicles line up at the entrance of Waste Management’s Capitol Disposal Landfill in Lemon Creek on Jan. 30, 2023. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: CBJ budget challenges mount

Borough budget challenges just got bigger — and messier A recent news… Continue reading

Jane Hale is a longtime Juneau resident. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Fight fascism — shop local

There’s an uncommon sight on Seward Street these days: a bra shop… Continue reading

People tour the garden plots during the 30th Annual Juneau Community Garden Harvest Fair on Saturday, Aug 24, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Increasing food security without a state agriculture department

There is a path to increasing food security without an Alaska Department… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Sullivan enabling Trump’s march toward authoritarian rule

To Sen. Sullivan: This letter is in response to your address to… Continue reading

The U.S. Capitol in December of 2024. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Opinion: Time to build a majority from anti-Trump minorities

Four years ago when Republicans defended the Senate filibuster, Sen. Dan Sullivan… Continue reading

Attendees of an empty-chair town hall clap on Thursday, March 20, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: A study in contrasts

If you call Social Security these days, the voice message states your… Continue reading